Hey..the 1st amendment guarantees that you are free to express your opinion. It also applies to your employers...if they don't like them , they can exercise their freedoms to be rid of you so long as it isn't for discriminatory reasons.
It is how they reward.I'm sure MSNBC or CNN will hire him in some capacity.
lol, fitting.....
http://www.post-gazette.com/busines...itorial-pages-Rob-Rogers/stories/201806190023[/QUOTE
I thought this was about another PG puff piece for Ped State. For me - I couldn’t care less about the rag. Their sports writers for the most part suck.
If they guy got fired he should be happy - maybe he can get a job at a real paper
I don’t have a lot of sympathy for him either. He has a new employer, who has a distinctly different editorial process than what he was used to, as well as a slightly different political bent, and became a bad fit. The P-G made a financial decision that he was no longer worth the trouble. That’s entirely their right. Sometimes, that’s just how it goes.
Personally, I think it’s important to have strong opinions on your editorial pages – even when you don’t agree with their POV. For years, syndicated conservative columnists like George Will and William F. Buckley were featured on the pages of the P-G. Nowadays, that is verboten. These Days everything’s an echo chamber and of course we are all worse off for it.
However, I think people would be wise to keep this in mind the next time they scream and moan about the “liberal media.” Conservatives control just as much of the media (or more) and have for a long time.
They get mad at the liberals when they dissent because dissent is dangerous to people in power.
Both sides are equally guilty of it. They’re each constantly trying to silence the other while simultaneously trying to maintain the moral high ground.
LOL!
They’re both just as thin-skinned as the other, both are obsessed with controlling narratives through demonization and each exercises its own form of political correctness – which puts emotions over logic and reality. Also, in most instances, their followers don’t even realize that they’re doing in their listings about 90% of the time.
Basically what I’m saying is the zealots on both sides are classic snowflakes and very rarely good critical thinkers.
Yeah, and that’s exactly what’s missing now. I can’t tell you how many times I had an opinion on an issue and would read that point/counterpoint and that would change my opinion - or at the very least give me a much greater appreciation for the complexity of it. That was very important! We don’t do that now and that is a real shame for all of us.I don’t have a lot of sympathy for him either. He has a new employer, who has a distinctly different editorial process than what he was used to, as well as a slightly different political bent, and became a bad fit. The P-G made a financial decision that he was no longer worth the trouble. That’s entirely their right. Sometimes, that’s just how it goes.
Personally, I think it’s important to have strong opinions on your editorial pages – even when you don’t agree with their POV. For years, syndicated conservative columnists like George Will and William F. Buckley were featured on the pages of the P-G. Nowadays, that is verboten. These Days everything’s an echo chamber and of course we are all worse off for it.
However, I think people would be wise to keep this in mind the next time they scream and moan about the “liberal media.” Conservatives control just as much of the media (or more) and have for a long time.
They get mad at the liberals when they dissent because dissent is dangerous to people in power.
Both sides are equally guilty of it. They’re each constantly trying to silence the other while simultaneously trying to maintain the moral high ground.
LOL!
They’re both just as thin-skinned as the other, both are obsessed with controlling narratives through demonization and each exercises its own form of political correctness – which puts emotions over logic and reality. Also, in most instances, their followers don’t even realize that they’re doing in their listings about 90% of the time.
Basically what I’m saying is the zealots on both sides are classic snowflakes and very rarely good critical thinkers.
I can't remember if it was the Press or Gazette that featured two opinion columns with opposing views of the same subject. I always enjoyed that because it was at least an opportunity to "hear it out".