ADVERTISEMENT

***Pitt @ Wake Game Thread***

He clearly did not see the screen. How can you avoid running into or over a guy that you don't see?

The whole point of setting a screen is to hold up the defender. There is contact on them all the time. How hard the contact is has nothing to do with whether it's a foul or not. It just isn't. If you don't believe me, check the rule book.
OK - I looked it up. Here's the language:

according to NCAA basketball rules, you cannot "knock down" a screener; a defender is not allowed to make illegal contact with a screener by pushing them over or causing them to fall, as this would be considered a foul and penalized as such.

You didn't like the call. OK. But it WAS a foul for gods sake.
 
I always have to remind myself even when the students at Pitt don’t “show up”. They are still 100 x more than a lot of places. There is no student section at wake other than the band. No advantage. I will say a lot more alumni and locals though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cavalier Panther
Look. It doesn't matter if he saw the screen. If that were the standard you could close your eyes and run people over and claim you didn't see them. It was a foul. Other calls have been questionable. That one was clear. And the refs happen to agree.


If that's the standard for a foul on a screen then there should have already been at least a half dozen of them called this game. At least.

And if you think that the ref agreeing means that it was called correctly, then how can you possibly think that any calls were questionable? After all, that's what the ref thought.
 
Wake with 0 offensive rebounds in the first half.

I wonder, have we held a team without an offensive rebound for a whole half at all this season before today?
 
Pitt only 4 turnovers but they seemed to come in that one spurt by Wake when they went up 9

Kante with some nice minutes

Very winnable game if Pitt stays out of foul and ref trouble

Wake shooting 55% but has 10 less FG attempts
 
If that's the standard for a foul on a screen then there should have already been at least a half dozen of them called this game. At least.

And if you think that the ref agreeing means that it was called correctly, then how can you possibly think that any calls were questionable? After all, that's what the ref thought.
Look. I gave you the rule. You can't knock guys over. Corhen clearly knocks him down. Foul. The refs called it. There have been plenty of questionable calls. But that wasn't one.
 
We could use some more production from the bench, especially if the foul trouble continues.

24 minutes, 2 points, 1-2 from the field, 1 rebound, 1 assist.
 
We're going to need to turn it up defensively and get some ball movement offensively if we want to win this one. We score when we keep spacing and ball movement.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT