ADVERTISEMENT

"Realistic" third superconference

GENAC

Athletic Director
Gold Member
Dec 17, 2010
16,942
22,890
113
If the Big Ten/SEC goal of getting to 20-24 teams is true, I maintain that the ACC's best plan is to just get there first. Get big, renegotiate the TV deal (taking huge liberties here as I have no idea how that works), and kill the other two conferences.

I'm not happy about having to pick from the scraps of the other two P5 conferences, but it's the only shot.

In this scenario, you'd have 6 pods of 4 teams. It maintains regional rivalries as much as possible (unfortunately killing in-state rivalries out west, but that has already happened to most of the country).

Pitt
WVU
Cincinnati
Louisville

BC
Syracuse
UVA
VT

UNC
NC State
Duke
Wake

GT
Clemson
FSU
Miami

OK State
Kansas
Houston
Baylor

Washington
Oregon
Stanford
Utah/Arizona

Continue some arrangement with ND and obviously find a way to get them in if they ever want to join.

I think this conference even is able to survive losing some members. UCF and USF to replace the Florida schools. Appalachian St to replace a loss in the Carolinas.

In my opinion, the SEC and Big Ten would struggle to exclude that group of 24 from a new expanded playoff. TV money would be much lower than the big two superconferences, but I think you'd stay competitive (unless the Big Ten and SEC kick out members like Rutgers and Vanderbilt and poach mid-tier schools from the new ACC).
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back