ADVERTISEMENT

What Should Pitt Basketball Be?

I might argue that these past three seasons - the good, the bad, and everything in between - is pretty close to the answer.

An NCAAT appearances about 33% of the time; a fighting chance more often than not during the other seasons.

Dixon 2

NCAAT in 3 out of 5 years. Still decent in the other 2 years. Of those 3 bids in 5 years, 1 has to be with a seed that is expected to make a run. Say a 6 seed or better.
 
The minimum standard for Pitt basketball should be a bubble team. Maybe in, maybe close but just out, but in the conversation, at least, for a bid when the ACC tournament starts. The realistic ceiling for Pitt basketball should be the second weekend of the tournament. A satisfying season should be a round of 64 or 32 season.
 
A hard-nosed team that we appreciate. A few low-post players with some actual meat on their bones, too. It has been guys who get pushed around the entire Capel regime.

Don't disagree. Just not sure that a different coach wouldn't bring in better coaching, in conjunction with worse players, to equal the same results. I mean in comparison to the last three seasons.
 
At this time and knowing that the coaching staff isn't changing any time soon, just give us a Pitt team that plays with some heart, effort and intensity on offense and especially on defense and rebounding. Show some life instead of standing around being spectators. Quit playing playground ball. And quit getting blown out by 20 points or more.
 
My answer would get me fired in a week as athletic director: to basically starting to deemphasize football and shift NIL and coaching salary money to hoops so you can try to make a final four run. Yes, I think this is possible in the NIL era, I wouldn't be shocked to see St Johns or Marquette there, NC State did it last year somehow. We are clearly never going to become Georgia or Ohio State in football EVER again and we just spend there because of nostalgic alumni.

Anyway, if we don't shift more resources to basketball (which is unlikely because it's a football town and the school is subsidizing athletics in an unsustainable way), then making the tournament 30% of the time is probably the range.
 
My answer would get me fired in a week as athletic director: to basically starting to deemphasize football and shift NIL and coaching salary money to hoops so you can try to make a final four run. Yes, I think this is possible in the NIL era, I wouldn't be shocked to see St Johns or Marquette there, NC State did it last year somehow. We are clearly never going to become Georgia or Ohio State in football EVER again and we just spend there because of nostalgic alumni.

Anyway, if we don't shift more resources to basketball (which is unlikely because it's a football town and the school is subsidizing athletics in an unsustainable way), then making the tournament 30% of the time is probably the range.

I'd agree. I'd do the Auburn and realize they can't compete in their situation in football and sink everything in basketball. Still, we can go 6-6 in football so no big loss there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TreesHero
Changing HC’s is just part 1 of a 2 part process.

The replacement hire having success is imperative. But anything in the future is an unknown. Greene has a lot of responsibility on his shoulders now. But that’s what he’s paid for.

Anyone accepting a high profile/high paid job as a P4 AD has to do so with their eyes wide open. They have to be prepared to act decisively and can’t allow themself to be surprised by any unexpected turn of events.

This should be interesting. The AD would appear to have a lot of issues on his plate right now. He’ll certainly be in the spotlight.
 
I'd agree. I'd do the Auburn and realize they can't compete in their situation in football and sink everything in basketball. Still, we can go 6-6 in football so no big loss there.
Do the Auburn?

What are you saying? Auburn is paying out the ass for football talent. They went big in the portal this year and they are implementing significant increases in ticket prices.
 
We are clearly never going to become Georgia or Ohio State in football EVER again and we just spend there because of nostalgic alumni.
I think a quick look at where donations come from would cause you to rethink the second half of this sentence. I bet 80% of Panther Club and A412 donations are driven by football, if not higher.
 
I think a quick look at where donations come from would cause you to rethink the second half of this sentence. I bet 80% of Panther Club and A412 donations are driven by football, if not higher.
Yes fair. That's ultimately the problem. We have a fairly small, not that wealthy, football first donor base. It's caught up with us.
 
I want a deep tourney run. Not a championship team every year, but every few years get a solid top 15 team. Looking back at the recent glory years, I would have swapped Pitts regular season big east success with WVU for their tourney wins. A lot of the tourney is about matchups, but a final four should still be achievable for Pitt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HailToPitt725
I don’t think there’s any reason why we shouldn’t be an annual tournament team, although I only expect a Sweet Sixteen appearance (or deeper) once every ten years… is that too much to ask?
 
I want to see a guard dribble down the court and not look like one of the 10 year olds I coach frenetically dribbling the ball into traffic and losing the handle. The basis of the Capel program is solid guard play. They don’t have it. Then I want to see if a shot is missed that there is a large individual who will get the rebound and score. Is that too much to ask? I am amazed that they can have 2 guys at or approaching 7 feet and get boxed out of the lane. It’s basic. Let’s start there. This talk of Pitt being anywhere close to a bubble team is ridiculous. They look like they are chasing bubbles on the court.
 
This team has lost 4 games they easily could’ve won . Winning those games they’re in the tournament. I’m not sure what you expect , but this team was fighting for and easily could’ve been a bubble team . Not every team pulls out their close games .

I don’t believe there’s enough money to have both Fb and Bb be top programs , and in reality I don’t think there’s enough money to seriously compete in Fb .

It would be a lot easier to be a Bb program , that’s where I’d put my resources if l was Pitt .
 
This team has lost 4 games they easily could’ve won . Winning those games they’re in the tournament. I’m not sure what you expect , but this team was fighting for and easily could’ve been a bubble team . Not every team pulls out their close games .

I don’t believe there’s enough money to have both Fb and Bb be top programs , and in reality I don’t think there’s enough money to seriously compete in Fb .

It would be a lot easier to be a Bb program , that’s where I’d put my resources if l was Pitt .
They also got lucky by pulling the OSU game out. You are what your record says you are.
 
I don’t think there’s any reason why we shouldn’t be an annual tournament team, although I only expect a Sweet Sixteen appearance (or deeper) once every ten years… is that too much to ask?


A school that is an annual tournament team but only makes the Sweet 16 once every ten years would be a really weird resume. There isn't anyone out there doing anything like that at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
The minimum standard for Pitt basketball should be a bubble team. Maybe in, maybe close but just out, but in the conversation, at least, for a bid when the ACC tournament starts. The realistic ceiling for Pitt basketball should be the second weekend of the tournament. A satisfying season should be a round of 64 or 32 season.
So... basically Paul Evans era is prime Pitt basketball. Wow.
 
Creighton, Dayton, Xavior, etc. Theres no reason with a solid coach this program can make the tourney more often than not and occasionally make a nice run Its been done before when the right coach has been hired.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT