Sad to say , but true that !I think capel. Stallings 4th year would be better than this garbage.
Not to mention that Dejan dude.Stallings had a much more difficult task. No fan support whatsoever, the AD who hired him skipped town, and he followed the most winning coach in program history.
All true, but who turned out the worst? I was in the anti-stallings mob on the board, (sad but true to say,) but if I were hiring today and it came down to Capel or Stallings, I would not even think about it, Stallings would get the call.At the time of the hire, Capel was by far the better selection, nearly universal approval. The Stalling's hire was horrible from the get go, he was about to be fired at Vandy, and was only hired because of shenanigans.
IMHO it would have been a wash. No one can recruit coming off a single digit win, 20 loss season. You no longer have a better future to sell recruits.
Once you are at that point it is over—-Next man up!
That’s awfully big “what if”. It still isn’t going to help his lack of coaching skills and selection of assistant coaches.FWIW, if none of the off court stuff happens last year this program is going in an entirely different direction. Capel was close to turning this around. The wheels just came off.
That’s awfully big “what if”. It still isn’t going to help his lack of coaching skills and selection of assistant coaches.
Very true.FWIW, if none of the off court stuff happens last year this program is going in an entirely different direction. Capel was close to turning this around. The wheels just came off.
Also very true.That’s awfully big “what if”. It still isn’t going to help his lack of coaching skills and selection of assistant coaches.
FWIW, if none of the off court stuff happens last year this program is going in an entirely different direction. Capel was close to turning this around. The wheels just came off.
Yeah, and if the Titanic misses the Iceberg it would have been a lovely trip....FWIW, if none of the off court stuff happens last year this program is going in an entirely different direction. Capel was close to turning this around. The wheels just came off.
if I were hiring today and it came down to Capel or Stallings, I would not even think about it, Stallings would get the call.
If I were hiring today and it came down to Capel or Stallings I'd get a gun and end it.
The battle is neck and neck, so I have to give Stallings the edge due to familial ties. He's brought us one of the better catchers in the game, whereas Capel has brought us... well, what does his brother do again?
Sounds like it's a done deal unless I read it the wrong way.Will the choice change if the Pirates trade Jacob in the next couple of days?
Sounds like it's a done deal unless I read it the wrong way.
Stallings had a much more difficult task. No fan support whatsoever, the AD who hired him skipped town, and he followed the most winning coach in program history.
Stallings inherited a team that returned 6 of its top 7 players, and had gone to the NCAA tournament. Chapel inherited a team that was 0-19 in the ACC. Which of those scenarios is worse?Stallings had a much more difficult task. No fan support whatsoever, the AD who hired him skipped town, and he followed the most winning coach in program history.
Stallings inherited a team that returned 6 of its top 7 players, and had gone to the NCAA tournament. Chapel inherited a team that was 0-19 in the ACC. Which of those scenarios is worse?
Stallings inherited a team that returned 6 of its top 7 players, and had gone to the NCAA tournament. Chapel inherited a team that was 0-19 in the ACC. Which of those scenarios is worse?
I get your point, but this is year four, with tons of support from the media and the university, etc. Bring in one good player a year, retain him, and you beat the UMBC, or whatever the call letters are, in year four. Year five does not look much better in terms of ACC play.Which of those scenarios is worse?
I am not defending Capel in year 4, just saying that he inherited a far worse situation than Stallings did. And for those who say Stallings would have done better if given 4 years - pure speculation. There is just no way to predict what he would have done.I get your point, but this is year four, with tons of support from the media and the university, etc. Bring in one good player a year, retain him, and you beat the UMBC, or whatever the call letters are, in year four. Year five does not look much better in terms of ACC play.
Stallings was a decent PG and Center away from an NCAAT team. I know a lot of teams could probably say that but he needed to find a way to land one but probably misevaluated Kithcart (who he recruited while at Vandy) just like everyone else. Also, as lowly recruited as Chukwuka was, if he could have found someone like that a year earlier, someone who could defend and rebound a little, that would have helped tremendously so that Young wouldn't have had to play the 5.
But was he a "true" 5?He had a center. Young played mostly the five for Dixon too.
He had a center. Young played mostly the five for Dixon too.
Dude … really … it’s ok for you to admit error. It’s good for the soul.Young almost never played the 5 for Dixon. Maybe a few minutes as a backup. His last year, they played platooned Maia, Nelson-Ododa, and Luther at the 5.
Had Stallings even landed a 5 as "good" as Maia and some halfway decent PG, that should have been an NCAAT team
Dude … really … it’s ok for you to admit error. It’s good for the soul.