I do too. I've never had a discussion before with someone who disagrees with both me and themselves.
That’s because it’s been you doing that’s, Sweetpea
I do too. I've never had a discussion before with someone who disagrees with both me and themselves.
That’s because it’s been you doing that’s, Sweetpea
DanThat’s because it’s been you doing that’s, Sweetpea
Dan
If trump would make an executive order or if Congress passes a law stating kneeling is illegal - the courts would shred that in seconds because it’s unconstitutional .
the nfl can absolutely make whatever role and policy they want their players to abide by - because that is t protected by the constitution.
it’s really this simple
You can’t say whatever you want on Facebook or twitter - and they can delete , modify or ban you from those platforms . Likewise chris can boot you from here for saying awful things which violate the terms of service .
Your speech isn’t protected on this message board by the constitution- because it’s a private entity .
The difference is that the right to protest isn’t covered in private settingsI never said it wasn’t. I said several times that policy is different from a right. He just keeps repeating what you just said. He finally acknowledged the difference and didn’t realize he was shouting into an echo chamber.
The difference is that the right to protest isn’t covered in private settings
The nfl policy matters more to players because their constitutional rights aren’t protected or applicable in a private entity .
Case in point - Bong Hits 4 Jesus
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_v._Frederick
Thanks. Again, didn't dispute the policy angle. It was rights versus policy.