NET 29 37 44 49
Q1. 2-5 1-3 2-6 2-6
Q2. 4-1 6-2 5-2 6-3
Q3. 5-1 9-0 6-2 7-0
Q4. 9-1 6-2 7-0 6-0
Road 5-5 4-5 7-4 5-6
Q1. 2-5 1-3 2-6 2-6
Q2. 4-1 6-2 5-2 6-3
Q3. 5-1 9-0 6-2 7-0
Q4. 9-1 6-2 7-0 6-0
Road 5-5 4-5 7-4 5-6
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Team 2nd from the right is clearly inNET 29 37 44 49
Q1. 2-5 1-3 2-6 2-6
Q2. 4-1 6-2 5-2 6-3
Q3. 5-1 9-0 6-2 7-0
Q4. 9-1 6-2 7-0 6-0
Road 5-5 4-5 7-4 5-6
Team @29 has other metrics not in their favor - like crap KPI , 0 of those road wins against power conference teams, and a really bad home loss in the last 10 days….The team currently @ 37 in the NET needs to move down and placed behind the other three, although their Q3 record is perfect.
The team @ 29 is still "best" followed by @ 44 (I presume that's Pitt) and then @ 49
FAU should be lower in NET with those two Q4 losses.
If they don't win their conference tournament they are going to find themselves on the outside looking in.
Idiot Lunardi has them 12 places ahead of Pitt? How?