Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was a weak call, also Michigan is going to get smoked when they play a real team in the playoff.
Pitt has played four top 25 teams. Two of those are in the top 10.When does Pitt play a real one?
So top 25 is the criteria to be considered real, and top 10 is realer?Pitt has played four top 25 teams. Two of those are in the top 10.
So top 25 is the criteria to be considered real, and top 10 is realer?
They will have to beat OSU to go to playoffsThat was a weak call, also Michigan is going to get smoked when they play a real team in the playoff.
Michigan will have to beat OSU to go to the playoffs, one would thinkThat was a weak call, also Michigan is going to get smoked when they play a real team in the playoff.
Mas o menosSo top 25 is the criteria to be considered real, and top 10 is realer?
Can you clear something up for me? The highest ranked team penn st beat was #24 Iowa, but Pitt beat #14 Louisville. Does that qualify under your criteria?When does Pitt play a real one?
Frankie absolutely sucks against top teams and his fans are moronic for attempting to pick this fightCan you clear something up for me? The highest ranked team penn st beat was #24 Iowa, but Pitt beat #14 Louisville. Does that qualify under your criteria?
It certainly does. It's good to be real, or realer.Can you clear something up for me? The highest ranked team penn st beat was #24 Iowa, but Pitt beat #14 Louisville. Does that qualify under your criteria?
Ok then, since it is real, can you just answer 1 last question?It certainly does. It's good to be real, or realer.
Joepa bigger fraud than both combinedOk then, since it is real, can you just answer 1 last question?
Who is the bigger fraud, franky or Good old multi million $$$ lincoln at USC?
What's real is that you and your sick ass fanbase still think craps-a-lot and Jerry were innocent.It certainly does. It's good to be real, or realer.
What's your definition of fraud? Are you suggesting it's correlated to salary?Ok then, since it is real, can you just answer 1 last question?
Who is the bigger fraud, franky or Good old multi million $$$ lincoln at USC?
Fraud is using Thon as a slush fund for players.What's your definition of fraud? Are you suggesting it's correlated to salary?
Salary and the talent on your team.What's your definition of fraud? Are you suggesting it's correlated to salary?
Franklin has beaten every coach he faced that receives a lower salary. Therefore, Riley is a Fraud by the salary definition. Franklin achieves a Satisfactory rating.Salary and the talent on your team.
Now before you answer that, 1 of them has at least been to the CFP Playoffs.
What??What's real is that you and your sick ass fanbase still think craps-a-lot and Jerry were innocent.
Denial? Whatever you say.Your in denial like the rest of you sickos.
So I guess making a final 4 doesn't matter? I guess you are satisfied being good, but not good enough.Franklin has beaten every coach he faced that receives a lower salary. Therefore, Riley is a Fraud by the salary definition. Franklin achieves a Satisfactory rating.
we have, an beat them, unlike youWhen does Pitt play a real one?
Of course I'm glad Penn State is good. But more so because they're real and probably going to end up realer.So I guess making a final 4 doesn't matter? I guess you are satisfied being good, but not good enough.
Of course I'm glad Penn State is good. But more so because they're real and probably going to end up realer.
When does Pitt play a real one?
Is this in reference to the intentional grounding call? I didn’t watch the game, but saw it posted. It was a bad call, but Michigan was winning by 5 and I highly doubt Maryland drives the entire length of the field.That was a weak call, also Michigan is going to get smoked when they play a real team in the playoff.
It was, I doubt Maryland was going to score on that drive but that call seemed like a blatant “protect the conferences playoff chance at all costs” move by the refs. They would have totally called it the other way if the roles were reversed.Is this in reference to the intentional grounding call? I didn’t watch the game, but saw it posted. It was a bad call, but Michigan was winning by 5 and I highly doubt Maryland drives the entire length of the field.