If both parties were interested their would already be parameters for a deal,to be honest we don't even know if PN even had serious discussions or even discussions with anyone at all as of yet
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Am I the only who thinks it can still be Napier, but it's taking extra because of being in the NC game?
I'm thinking the plan was to talk him at the AFCA, but he had to wait a couple days. Now they are ironing out contract stuff before making any sort of announcement.
Am I crazy?
not crazy. but let me ask you a question, why do you think its napier? this goes for anyone else as well. reason for asking, and i was going to make a post about this so i'll put it here. there was one person on these boards who created a napier to pitt thread, i've not read that anywhere else. like in the past, a thread is created and posters run with it. there was napier talk last year as well.
recruiting is down to crunch time, time is of the essence when it comes to recruiting. this is a huge recruiting weekend. if it was napier, they would have hammered out that deal and had napier in town for this big recruiting weekend. its a huge "in person" recruiting weekend.
i guess its possible for a poster on this board to have inside info but is it likely? especially since were dealing with pitt and how they like to keep everything hush hush. the sites we check for coaching hires has not listed one single name as to who might be a candidate.
i mentioned before, not sure he has the experience narduzzi is looking for. not my opinion, just saying what i think narduzzi is thinking. he's hired two OC's and they've both had tons of game calling experience. now, if he starts getting some no's. then he might have to loosen up his criteria.
lets just hope this doesn't drag on and in the end, narduzzi finds his "matt house".
not crazy. but let me ask you a question, why do you think its napier? this goes for anyone else as well. reason for asking, and i was going to make a post about this so i'll put it here. there was one person on these boards who created a napier to pitt thread, i've not read that anywhere else. like in the past, a thread is created and posters run with it. there was napier talk last year as well.
recruiting is down to crunch time, time is of the essence when it comes to recruiting. this is a huge recruiting weekend. if it was napier, they would have hammered out that deal and had napier in town for this big recruiting weekend. its a huge "in person" recruiting weekend.
i guess its possible for a poster on this board to have inside info but is it likely? especially since were dealing with pitt and how they like to keep everything hush hush. the sites we check for coaching hires has not listed one single name as to who might be a candidate.
i mentioned before, not sure he has the experience narduzzi is looking for. not my opinion, just saying what i think narduzzi is thinking. he's hired two OC's and they've both had tons of game calling experience. now, if he starts getting some no's. then he might have to loosen up his criteria.
lets just hope this doesn't drag on and in the end, narduzzi finds his "matt house".
not crazy. but let me ask you a question, why do you think its napier? this goes for anyone else as well. reason for asking, and i was going to make a post about this so i'll put it here. there was one person on these boards who created a napier to pitt thread, i've not read that anywhere else. like in the past, a thread is created and posters run with it. there was napier talk last year as well.
recruiting is down to crunch time, time is of the essence when it comes to recruiting. this is a huge recruiting weekend. if it was napier, they would have hammered out that deal and had napier in town for this big recruiting weekend. its a huge "in person" recruiting weekend.
i guess its possible for a poster on this board to have inside info but is it likely? especially since were dealing with pitt and how they like to keep everything hush hush. the sites we check for coaching hires has not listed one single name as to who might be a candidate.
i mentioned before, not sure he has the experience narduzzi is looking for. not my opinion, just saying what i think narduzzi is thinking. he's hired two OC's and they've both had tons of game calling experience. now, if he starts getting some no's. then he might have to loosen up his criteria.
lets just hope this doesn't drag on and in the end, narduzzi finds his "matt house".
Whats with the crappy avatars grey with the R in the middle?
Walt's almost 70. Add to that, Walt hated to run the ball. Hell with the ball on the one yard line, Walt preferred to throw a fade pattern. I don't see his philosophy meshing with Narduzzi's. Walt's not a viable candidate.
In fact, if you look at Walt's last four seasons at Pitt (2001 - 2004) the team's Run to Pass Ratio based on season totals was (52.7% / 47.3%), (59.5% / 40.5%), (52.4% / 47.6%), and (51.6% / 48.4%), respectively. Total season rushing yards vs. passing yards in those years were (1,358 / 2,434), (1,861 / 2,796), (1,537 / 3,746), and (1,198 / 3,121), respectively. In each of those years, Pitt ran more than it passed, despite the pass being significantly more productive. Clearly Walt didn't have an aversion to running the ball. If anything, he may have run too much. Given Pitt's stable of running backs, I think he would be inclined to run quite a bit.I get your point, but I remember Barlow running wild a few times, and Polite scoring with time running out to beat VT. Walt was a terrific offensive mind and a good HC. I don't think Duzz would consider him, but he did much for Pitt and he certainly has had success with offenses and QBs.
Napier follows a lot of coaches. He also coached with Conklin in 2005 and they both coached in the state of South Carolina for about a decade.I read somewhere and not just here, he just started following Duzz and our DC on twitter.
While we're waiting.......
Petrino swipes the OL coach from Florida
Out of all the names discussed in this thread the only one who even begins to make me feel comfortable is Alex Van Pelt. He's a Pitt guy who I think would just be a solid hire. I can't say I know a lot about him in terms of style of offense but if his name is being thrown around I doubt it's because he runs the spread haha.
while were waiting.........
PC is on the verge of losing his DC to Cal. who makes their hire first, us or PC?
You honestly think he picks any of his staff members?the head man up stare does all the work and hires who he wants not PC
LIKE WHO?!?!So, are you saying , Pitt is not really offering 1 million a year , only did that to save face with Canada, cause for a million , you could have a sure fire hire
I think you can get someone for a million, but I don't think we throw that around willy nilly. I might try to cap someone like Napier at 750K, but might offer 600K as the starting rate. There are far more variables, but I'm spitballing.
I both love and hate your "while we are waiting" posts...for college football wonks, they're just interesting (ergo, the love) , and damming proof (yet again) that so many programs are maddeningly so much more dynamic than ours (ergo, the hate). But much like distasteful medicine to strengthen a sick body, sometimes you need to be confronted painful facts.While we're waiting....
Wilcox the new coach at Cal has hired beau Baldwin eastern wash. HC to be his new OC.
While we're waiting......
For you chip Kelly fans, last week he interviewed for the Jax HC job. Today's he's interviewing for the Jax OC job.