I never got the signing even for one year. But yeah, I am not sure who was holding a gun to Rutherford's head and signed him to 6 years.I don’t know- they must have seen something
What I mean is - if they signed him to a 2 year deal instead of a 6 year deal -
The concern wouldn’t be there as much because the downside was minimized
It was a bad contract due to the length - not the base annual salary
I am glad he is gone, but not in a vindictive manner. He could have just "not played". But for some reason as much as he struggled Sullivan put him out there and it was really problematic. But they just kept on doing it.
It was a necessary move, it does improve the team but let's face it, having or not having Jack Johnson is not the difference of getting swept out of the 1st rd by the Isle or Canadians and being an instant cup contender.