Years long complaints, never made at the time, are getting people fired today.
Except that absolutely is NOT what happened in this case.
Years long complaints, never made at the time, are getting people fired today.
Yeah...and that top 10 served them well didn't it. They managed to parlay that top 10 start without that "loser snowflake" into a fantastic "others receiving votes" finish.
This is what we have become. I suppose you think it is a good thing.I didn't say a word about you. But the fact that you jumped to me inferring you were racist plus your original point is awfully telling isn't it.
To answer your question - I applaud sexual assault survivors and victims of racism for having the courage to speak out and I think it's a good thing that they feel enabled to do so.
ETA: I don't know how anyone can watch how issues like sexual assault are treated by the media and the justice system (the coverage and handling of Brock Turner, for example) and conclude anything but the fact that the deck is immensely stacked against the assaulted party.
Except that absolutely is NOT what happened in this case.
This is what we have become. I suppose you think it is a good thing.
https://nypost.com/2018/08/24/former-head-of-cdc-arrested-for-groping-woman/
Frieden admitted to the charges and pled down to a disorderly conduct. He retained his job and dignity because he was honest.
I personally think that reporting the issue 10 months later is problematic as you note. I think most states have a short criminal statute of limitations on issues like this (I am not positive), which makes a lot of sense.
I think Joe makes a good point here though, which is that Bolton's situation is a lot different Frieden's situation. Bolton made an issue of this very quickly in-house whereas Frieden's accuser took much, much more time. He made an out of house issue much later because he felt that Chambers was disingenuous.
With PSU and Chambers, I really think the issue is more process and maybe honesty than the words themselves. It is very odd that Bolton was one that was recommended to go see a counselor, not Chambers. And, the fact that all parties disagree on what was said does often occur, but it is just very strange here.
It didn't take 10 months for the woman to report it, that's the time period for the police to take action. He even informed his employer of the accusation in April.
Gary - what is it you think should have happened here?
It took 9-10 months. It happened in October and she reported it in July of the following year unless I am reading the article wrong. Am I reading the article wrong?
The article states he made his employer aware in April, who then reviewed his actions within the office. The arrest happened in the ten month time frame.
That still means that it took her 10 months to file a report though. Evidently, he just had a period of time in which he knew it was coming.
Would you agree that "the climate" encourages claims and grievances to be made that are years old or current grievances that in a different time would not have necessarily gone public or received wide attention?Frieden admitted to the charges and pled down to a disorderly conduct. He retained his job and dignity because he was honest.
I personally think that reporting the issue 10 months later is problematic as you note. I think most states have a short criminal statute of limitations on issues like this (I am not positive), which makes a lot of sense.
I think Joe makes a good point here though, which is that Bolton's situation is a lot different Frieden's situation. Bolton made an issue of this very quickly in-house whereas Frieden's accuser took much, much more time. He made an out of house issue much later because he felt that Chambers was disingenuous.
With PSU and Chambers, I really think the issue is more process and maybe honesty than the words themselves. It is very odd that Bolton was one that was recommended to go see a counselor, not Chambers. And, the fact that all parties disagree on what was said does often occur, but it is just very strange here.
I believe that means it took that long for the police to charge him, nothing more. No telling how long it took for an investigation, but I would think if he told his employer in April that she made an accusation prior to that.
I'm not trying to come across as argumentative.
You don't think this case was overcharged? He knew her for thirty years. You think a heart felt apology might have sufficed?I believe that means it took that long for the police to charge him, nothing more. No telling how long it took for an investigation, but I would think if he told his employer in April that she made an accusation prior to that.
I'm not trying to come across as argumentative.
This is what we have become. I suppose you think it is a good thing.
https://nypost.com/2018/08/24/former-head-of-cdc-arrested-for-groping-woman/
This is what we have become. I suppose you think it is a good thing.
https://nypost.com/2018/08/24/former-head-of-cdc-arrested-for-groping-woman/
Would you agree that "the climate" encourages claims and grievances to be made that are years old or current grievances that in a different time would not have necessarily gone public or received wide attention?
You don't think this case was overcharged? He knew her for thirty years. You think a heart felt apology might have sufficed?
You don't think this case was overcharged? He knew her for thirty years. You think a heart felt apology might have sufficed?
Noticed you didn't comment on the entire Kavanaugh episode.Again. Why is your concern for the individual carrying out the assault. Who the f are you to say how a sexual assault victim should respond.
Bet you celebrated that the courts went easy on Brock Turner.
It was and is to bring the matter to the police.Shouldn't that be up to her?
Again. Why is your concern for the individual carrying out the assault. Who the f are you to say how a sexual assault victim should respond.
People as a Black man that works in a field where I'm usually the only one or maybe 2 of us and if I can go without saying anything stupid they should be able to do the same thing no excuses period! I give you respect so I command that I get the same respect back. I know that there's a couple of guys that probably never worked with a black man before and they're probably used to saying anything but as long as I don't hear I'm good but the moment you overstepped the line I will make sure I put you back over that line. As a coach he should've never been near that statement but for some reason he felt very comfortable saying what he said that's where the problem lies it wasn't a mistake it was comfortability that allowed him to say that.
It was and is to bring the matter to the police.
Taking him out in handcuffs and charging what was charged was up to someone else.
Noticed you didn't comment on the entire Kavanaugh episode.
Noticed you didn't comment on the entire Kavanaugh episode.
Just checked in on this thread.The fact that you think Kavanaugh is an example that supports metoo going "too far" is as hilarious as it is disturbing. That Kavanaugh is sitting on the highest bench in the land is clear evidence that the metoo movement hasn't gone nearly far enough.
No sense to talking to you any further on this topic.The fact that you think Kavanaugh is an example that supports metoo going "too far" is as hilarious as it is disturbing. That Kavanaugh is sitting on the highest bench in the land is clear evidence that the metoo movement hasn't gone nearly far enough.
Credible accusation? No sense talking to you any further on this topic.And you continue to defend abusers and assaulters. What’s your point. Why do you have more sympathy for the perpetrators than the victims?
I have no problem with someone holding a position as important as Kavanaugh being fully investigated for a credible assault accusation.
My fault I apologize.Just checked in on this thread.
what happened to talking about Psu and Rasir Bolton? How did we get to ppl saying Kavanaugh shouldn’t be on the Supreme Court because Garth from Wayne’s World claims he touched her breast in 1988 when she was blacked out?
Credible accusation? No sense talking to you any further on this topic.
Credible accusation? No sense talking to you any further on this topic.
When did attack occur? Where did attack occur? How did you get to location? How did you leave location? Who was there? Can anyone support your allegations?Length of time from action to accusation has absolutely zero to do with credibility. No matter how much you want that to be the case.
When did attack occur? Where did attack occur? How did you get to location? How did you leave location? Who was there? Can anyone support your allegations?
Credible? How?
Agree, length of time makes no difference. You do have to provide these kind of details to be credible.
Go to a police station and make a complaint based on this lack of detail and see your complaint handled and dismissed in Avery short time frame. It would be extremely hard to proceed with no information, only an allegation.
Absolutely racist dude. No fear if you understand and are learned about subjects that justifiably make people angry. You must don’t want to take the time because it’s not worth your effort and you kind of enjoy tweaking people occasionally. Am I right? So now you want to say crap but truly know you shouldn’t but you don’t know how to have a socially appropriate conversation with a person so you just avoid it. Recognize your privilege and work to change it.It is not me who did that. It is not "ridiculously racist" as it is fearful. You see that don't you? I don't what I do today that is going offend someone tomorrow. Can't people sometimes just let things go? I hate country music and it offends me. That doesn't mean you shouldn't listen to it.
You aren't the arbiter are you? Where you elected?Absolutely racist dude. No fear if you understand and are learned about subjects that justifiably make people angry. You must don’t want to take the time because it’s not worth your effort and you kind of enjoy tweaking people occasionally. Am I right? So now you want to say crap but truly know you shouldn’t but you don’t know how to have a socially appropriate conversation with a person so you just avoid it. Recognize your privilege and work to change it.
No use arguing with people who find repressed memories retrieved from psychiatric patients under hypnosis therapy to be credible.When did attack occur? Where did attack occur? How did you get to location? How did you leave location? Who was there? Can anyone support your allegations?
Credible? How?
Agree, length of time makes no difference. You do have to provide these kind of details to be credible.
Go to a police station and make a complaint based on this lack of detail and see your complaint handled and dismissed in Avery short time frame. It would be extremely hard to proceed with no information, only an allegation.
You are right.No use arguing with people who find repressed memories retrieved from psychiatric patients under hypnosis therapy to be credible.
Learn to just walk away.
This is, to the word, the exact same thing that the Penn State truthers say when they try and argue that Sandusky's victims are lying.No use arguing with people who find repressed memories retrieved from psychiatric patients under hypnosis therapy to be credible.
Learn to just walk away.
This is, to the word, the exact same thing that the Penn State truthers say when they try and argue that Sandusky's victims are lying.