Nah, country is pretty big in western PAThat was the Luke Combs concert.
My 17 year old's favorite group is Love Joy, out of the UK. Been waiting 2 years to see them.I feel bad for some parents. I don't know that ticket prices have ever been this outrageous for anything this large-scale (maybe for Hamilton or various private endeavors at much more intimate venues... but I don't think too many teenagers were guilting their parents into forking over this kind of cash for those things).
And you absolutely ARE going to hell for liking Kiss, haha.
Saw them on their last stop of their 2004 tour, 6 curtain calls and the best version of Crazy Mary ever.
Nah, country is pretty big in western PA
Kiss way better at making music than anyone wants to give credit. No not rush or zep. But solid hits.Price is what kept me from wading in and trying to get them. We went to see the traveling production of Chorus Line last summer and I was sort of surprised at the prices for a matinee. There are just so many taxes and fees anymore. And I can only imagine what a hotel downtown will cost this weekend.
My kid just looks at me when I tell her that we used drop $20 for most of the concerts and if you wanted to splurge, you dropped another $20 on a t-shirt.
Don't judge me over KISS. I'll just say it was a different time and leave it at that.
Kiss way better at making music than anyone wants to give credit. No not rush or zep. But solid hits.
Objectively paul stanley top 5 rock vocalist ever in prime.
I mean it’s no different than a big steeler game with regard to crowds
People are weird about traffic .
Kiss way better at making music than anyone wants to give credit. No not rush or zep. But solid hits.
Objectively paul stanley top 5 rock vocalist ever in prime.
Agree to all of this. And that musicians are no more altruistic that the average person. Most will forget how the Beatles d1cked over Pete Best right before they hit it huge. Then ganged up on Paul during the Alan Klein fiasco (though he was clearly right and was warned of such by Mick Jagger). Bruce screwed over many of his band members as well, etc . Many of those stories are at least as interesting as the music of the acts itself…They actually had very catchy pop riffs and I always cracked up when "serious" music fans didn't take them seriously. Gene & Paul are kind of jerks though, or actually typical CEO businessmen, depending how you look at it. Their treatment of Ace & Peter wasn't good.
Kiss always ripped it on the guitar riffs. Seriously.Agree to all of this. And that musicians are no more altruistic that the average person. Most will forget how the Beatles d1cked over Pete Best right before they hit it huge. Then ganged up on Paul during the Alan Klein fiasco (though he was clearly right and was warned of such by Mick Jagger). Bruce screwed over many of his band members as well, etc . Many of those stories are at least as interesting as the music of the acts itself…
Since there are two mega-tours going on almost simultaneously, her and Springsteen, I wonder which will end up drawing the most fans and being the most successful financially. Both are getting mostly terrific reviews.
Just looking at the clips, she obviously has a lot more special effects in her show. I don’t recall any special effects in either of Bruce’s Barcelona shows. She also is spending a lot more on costuming. His only costume change is putting on a fresh black t-shirt if his first one gets too sweaty.
On the other hand, he is paying the 8 members of E-Street Band, a 4-man horn section (not including E-Street’s Jake Clemons), 3 backup singers and 2 backup singers/percussionists. I don’t know how many dancers her show uses and how many musicians are in her band, but there seem to be a lot. Very likely paid significantly less than the E-Street Band.
The day before her concerts, apparently thousands came to Acrisure that afternoon merely to buy TS merchandise (!). Have to figure this is true in all cities? And I can’t imagine that would be occurring the day before Springsteen (or Chesney or Bryan stadium shows) ….? So, that alone one would think would be raising many additional millions for her. (But this is a new day and age and I haven’t gone to any concerts like those for a good decade, so I won’t doubt if merch sales like that is happening before all these big shows?).Since there are two mega-tours going on almost simultaneously, her and Springsteen, I wonder which will end up drawing the most fans and being the most successful financially. Both are getting mostly terrific reviews.
Just looking at the clips, she obviously has a lot more special effects in her show. I don’t recall any special effects in either of Bruce’s Barcelona shows. She also is spending a lot more on costuming. His only costume change is putting on a fresh black t-shirt if his first one gets too sweaty.
On the other hand, he is paying the 8 members of E-Street Band, a 4-man horn section (not including E-Street’s Jake Clemons), 3 backup singers and 2 backup singers/percussionists. I don’t know how many dancers her show uses and how many musicians are in her band, but there seem to be a lot. Very likely paid significantly less than the E-Street Band.
Her show has been described as mix of a concert and Broadway-level production.
Is there really any doubt which is going to be the most successful tour financially?
Swift just sold a little more than 146,000 tickets in Pittsburgh alone. Springsteen is in Pittsburgh in September, and his one show isn't even sold out yet at the much smaller venue.
I didn't pay any attention to the face value when those tickets first went on sale, but I read that the average price, face value, not on the secondary market, was $133. $133 x 146,000 is almost a $19.5 million gate. Springsteen's Pittsburgh sales won't be a quarter of that.
Oh I have no doubt that if Taylor Swift did a one off tour date, just one show (like she plays one show in the US next year), in the same venue as the Super Bowl, the tickets for the Taylor Swift show would be more expensive and in more demand than Super Bowl tix. I don’t even think it would be close.How is this even a question? A better comparison is 1 Taylor Swift show vs the Super Bowl. Do nosebleeds to the Super Bowl go for $1500/each? Maybe they do. But there are 40 Taylor Swift games to go to vs just 1 Super Bowl annually. This is right up there with the most popular tours in world history
I have no doubt she could've played at least 2-3 more sell outs in a row just in Pittsburgh.How is this even a question? A better comparison is 1 Taylor Swift show vs the Super Bowl. Do nosebleeds to the Super Bowl go for $1500/each? Maybe they do. But there are 40 Taylor Swift games to go to vs just 1 Super Bowl annually. This is right up there with the most popular tours in world history
I have no doubt she could've played at least 2-3 more sell outs in a row just in Pittsburgh.
"If the current spending pace continues through the end of the tour, the Eras Tour will have generated an estimated $5 billion [US] in economic impact, more than the gross domestic product of 50 countries,"
She might personally reverse the dropping inflation numbers lol.
She's got 45 shows in the US on this current tour. All are at stadiums. All the ones that have happened already have sold out. All the ones remaining are sold out.
According to Billboard, the projected gross for the tour is expected to be approximately $591 million. For just 45 shows. Over $13 million gate per show on average.
They expected to gross $800 mil including merchandise.
I have no doubt she could've played at least 2-3 more sell outs in a row just in Pittsburgh.
2-3 more? She could have sold out every show in Pittsburgh playing every day for weeks/months. People would have come from all over. Its an incredible phenomenon that I cant keep wrap my head around.
I'm talking about if she stuck with her current tour schedule and played 5 shows in Pittsburgh before moving to another city.2-3 more? She could have sold out every show in Pittsburgh playing every day for weeks/months. People would have come from all over. Its an incredible phenomenon that I cant keep wrap my head around.
She’s not untalented. But he singing, playing, lyrics, etc are a dime a dozen. Certainly nothing memorable or polarizing like the Beatles, Zep, MJ, Prince, Madonna, U2, etc.I don't listen to very much modern music. I mean the "new" artists I do like are singer/songwriters who probably play for 250 people/night, on average. But my guess is she just the best of "what's out there." In the 80's, you had Prince, Madonna, Bruce, Michael Jackson, etc. at the top... the whole hair band genre was just coming into existence... the great bands of the 60's and 70's were still putting on great shows and still young... in addition to the up-and-coming pop (and other) acts that will always exist. I mean, there were so many choices. Now, I mean there's a reason why those bands from the 60's and 70's are still some of the top tickets. There just aren't many good ones out there. Seems like the big tickets are often drug-laden festival shows (which, to be fair, existed back in the day, also, albeit probably not as commonly) - not exactly family friendly or everyone's cup of tea.
She’s not untalented. But he singing, playing, lyrics, etc are a dime a dozen. Certainly nothing memorable or polarizing like the Beatles, Zep, MJ, Prince, Madonna, U2, etc.
Every generation or so someone emerges as The Act, particularly with the young girls, and this is the one for right now.
I think a couple things boost her massive concert appeal over similar ( or let’s face it, better) artists. The first is that this is one of the first really big mainstream tours that comes after the Pandemic officially fully was proclaimed ‘over’ (Chesney and the like that never really stopped during that time don’t count, their appeal is with Deplorables). Other big acts are out there too but they are mainly geezers who are past their prime and simply not appealing to the same (massively lucrative) demo.
The second is not her pedestrian music and awkward white-chick dancing, but her personal life niche. Mainly, she has turned the tables on ‘exploitive’ male pop stars; she sleeps around with many dudes (often minor celebrities too, so it makes news), she loves ‘em, leaves em (or makes it appear she was the one who left them) … then sings songs trashing em.
Big deal, Janis Joplin and others lived like that. BUT they were raunchy, repulsive to mainstream young girls. Madonna was closer, but a bit too nasty for comfort. However, Swift ACTS like a male rock star pig, but still LOOKS frilly, sequined and girly perpetual teenage girl ( despite now in mid 30s). So the trashy personal life appeals to 20-something sluts, yet it’s still fun for the 12 year old Suburban girls (and their mom, who may be a 30-something slut, that wants to look hot) to dress up like her.
It is perfect timing for the era where adult fans are determined to be the dirt bags now(but still HOTTIE dirt bags), for want of a more effete term. But the 12 year old girls want to be, well, 12 year old girls. That adds up to millions and millions. Ka Ching indeed.
Hey, I’m not knocking her, I tip my cap for her for capitalizing on this, and that’s a key word, a derivative of capitalism.
Plus one can actually sing, and the other doesn’t .Is there really any doubt which is going to be the most successful tour financially?
Swift just sold a little more than 146,000 tickets in Pittsburgh alone. Springsteen is in Pittsburgh in September, and his one show isn't even sold out yet at the much smaller venue.
I didn't pay any attention to the face value when those tickets first went on sale, but I read that the average price, face value, not on the secondary market, was $133. $133 x 146,000 is almost a $19.5 million gate. Springsteen's Pittsburgh sales won't be a quarter of that.
We get itShe’s not untalented. But he singing, playing, lyrics, etc are a dime a dozen. Certainly nothing memorable or polarizing like the Beatles, Zep, MJ, Prince, Madonna, U2, etc.
Every generation or so someone emerges as The Act, particularly with the young girls, and this is the one for right now.
I think a couple things boost her massive concert appeal over similar ( or let’s face it, better) artists. The first is that this is one of the first really big mainstream tours that comes after the Pandemic officially fully was proclaimed ‘over’ (Chesney and the like that never really stopped during that time don’t count, their appeal is with Deplorables). Other big acts are out there too but they are mainly geezers who are past their prime and simply not appealing to the same (massively lucrative) demo.
The second is not her pedestrian music and awkward white-chick dancing, but her personal life niche. Mainly, she has turned the tables on ‘exploitive’ male pop stars; she sleeps around with many dudes (often minor celebrities too, so it makes news), she loves ‘em, leaves em (or makes it appear she was the one who left them) … then sings songs trashing em.
Big deal, Janis Joplin and others lived like that. BUT they were raunchy, repulsive to mainstream young girls. Madonna was closer, but a bit too nasty for comfort. However, Swift ACTS like a male rock star pig, but still LOOKS frilly, sequined and girly perpetual teenage girl ( despite now in mid 30s). So the trashy personal life appeals to 20-something sluts, yet it’s still fun for the 12 year old Suburban girls (and their mom, who may be a 30-something slut, that wants to look hot) to dress up like her.
It is perfect timing for the era where adult fans are determined to be the dirt bags now(but still HOTTIE dirt bags), for want of a more effete term. But the 12 year old girls want to be, well, 12 year old girls. That adds up to millions and millions. Ka Ching indeed.
Hey, I’m not knocking her, I tip my cap for her for capitalizing on this, and that’s a key word, a derivative of capitalism.
She’s not untalented. But he singing, playing, lyrics, etc are a dime a dozen. Certainly nothing memorable or polarizing like the Beatles, Zep, MJ, Prince, Madonna, U2, etc.
Every generation or so someone emerges as The Act, particularly with the young girls, and this is the one for right now.
I think a couple things boost her massive concert appeal over similar ( or let’s face it, better) artists. The first is that this is one of the first really big mainstream tours that comes after the Pandemic officially fully was proclaimed ‘over’ (Chesney and the like that never really stopped during that time don’t count, their appeal is with Deplorables). Other big acts are out there too but they are mainly geezers who are past their prime and simply not appealing to the same (massively lucrative) demo.
The second is not her pedestrian music and awkward white-chick dancing, but her personal life niche. Mainly, she has turned the tables on ‘exploitive’ male pop stars; she sleeps around with many dudes (often minor celebrities too, so it makes news), she loves ‘em, leaves em (or makes it appear she was the one who left them) … then sings songs trashing em.
Big deal, Janis Joplin and others lived like that. BUT they were raunchy, repulsive to mainstream young girls. Madonna was closer, but a bit too nasty for comfort. However, Swift ACTS like a male rock star pig, but still LOOKS frilly, sequined and girly perpetual teenage girl ( despite now in mid 30s). So the trashy personal life appeals to 20-something sluts, yet it’s still fun for the 12 year old Suburban girls (and their mom, who may be a 30-something slut, that wants to look hot) to dress up like her.
It is perfect timing for the era where adult fans are determined to be the dirt bags now(but still HOTTIE dirt bags), for want of a more effete term. But the 12 year old girls want to be, well, 12 year old girls. That adds up to millions and millions. Ka Ching indeed.
Hey, I’m not knocking her, I tip my cap for her for capitalizing on this, and that’s a key word, a derivative of capitalism.
You’re a try hard.She’s not untalented. But he singing, playing, lyrics, etc are a dime a dozen. Certainly nothing memorable or polarizing like the Beatles, Zep, MJ, Prince, Madonna, U2, etc.
Every generation or so someone emerges as The Act, particularly with the young girls, and this is the one for right now.
I think a couple things boost her massive concert appeal over similar ( or let’s face it, better) artists. The first is that this is one of the first really big mainstream tours that comes after the Pandemic officially fully was proclaimed ‘over’ (Chesney and the like that never really stopped during that time don’t count, their appeal is with Deplorables). Other big acts are out there too but they are mainly geezers who are past their prime and simply not appealing to the same (massively lucrative) demo.
The second is not her pedestrian music and awkward white-chick dancing, but her personal life niche. Mainly, she has turned the tables on ‘exploitive’ male pop stars; she sleeps around with many dudes (often minor celebrities too, so it makes news), she loves ‘em, leaves em (or makes it appear she was the one who left them) … then sings songs trashing em.
Big deal, Janis Joplin and others lived like that. BUT they were raunchy, repulsive to mainstream young girls. Madonna was closer, but a bit too nasty for comfort. However, Swift ACTS like a male rock star pig, but still LOOKS frilly, sequined and girly perpetual teenage girl ( despite now in mid 30s). So the trashy personal life appeals to 20-something sluts, yet it’s still fun for the 12 year old Suburban girls (and their mom, who may be a 30-something slut, that wants to look hot) to dress up like her.
It is perfect timing for the era where adult fans are determined to be the dirt bags now(but still HOTTIE dirt bags), for want of a more effete term. But the 12 year old girls want to be, well, 12 year old girls. That adds up to millions and millions. Ka Ching indeed.
Hey, I’m not knocking her, I tip my cap for her for capitalizing on this, and that’s a key word, a derivative of capitalism.