Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who stole the fountain?
In the Smithsonian, there are journals / diaries that were found at the Elmira Confederate prisoner of War camp in New York.
In a couple of these journals, there were pages describing the POW's journey from southern battlefields to the camp. They were placed on coal barges and shipped up the Ohio River to Pittsburgh....and then the Allegheny to NY.
Historians have written that the first people in the country to know for certain who would win the Civil War were these confederate POW's, because when they got to Pittsburgh.....all they could see were factories making rifles, cannons, artillery, etc.
One of the journals wrote this almost word for word, "when we got to Pittsburgh we knew we could not win".
Interesting how much lower the river was before they built the Emsworth dam a few years later.
You're a splendid writer.Marvelous photo! A really unique vantage point among the many great old photos of Pittsburgh.
Snapped from the Manchester Bridge above the Allegheny Rv, obviously looking at the utterly non-glamorized "point" with the "Point" Bridge in the background crossing the Mon.
Pittsburgh and its then-unnoted beautiful topography existed for one reason: the optimization of industry and production. ANYTHING else at the time - including human dignity - was an utterly moot point. Yet it was the epicenter of perhaps the nation's most important region during its most important period of development. Heavy metals (iron, steel, aluminum, titanium), oil & gas, electricity, glass. Technology (radio) and scientific achievement here were unparalleled.
Coolest, and most telling, factoids about Pittsburgh in the year that my late father was born into a large Slovak immigrant family on the North Side (1920): Pittsburgh held more bank wealth than any city in the WORLD not named New York (think about that!) and it was also home to the highest proportion of immigrants than any city in the USA. This smallish area was then a Top 10 population center in the USA.
Astounding place... and why native son and national-historian, David McCullough, refers to Pittsburgh as "the indispensable American city"
I think human dignity is founded in production.Marvelous photo! A really unique vantage point among the many great old photos of Pittsburgh.
Snapped from the Manchester Bridge above the Allegheny Rv, obviously looking at the utterly non-glamorized "point" with the "Point" Bridge in the background crossing the Mon.
Pittsburgh and its then-unnoted beautiful topography existed for one reason: the optimization of industry and production. ANYTHING else at the time - including human dignity - was an utterly moot point. Yet it was the epicenter of perhaps the nation's most important region during its most important period of development. Heavy metals (iron, steel, aluminum, titanium), oil & gas, electricity, glass. Technology (radio) and scientific achievement here were unparalleled.
Coolest, and most telling, factoids about Pittsburgh in the year that my late father was born into a large Slovak immigrant family on the North Side (1920): Pittsburgh held more bank wealth than any city in the WORLD not named New York (think about that!) and it was also home to the highest proportion of immigrants than any city in the USA. This smallish area was then a Top 10 population center in the USA.
Astounding place... and why native son and national-historian, David McCullough, refers to Pittsburgh as "the indispensable American city"
I think human dignity is founded in production.
Pittsburgh and in fact this country was built on the backs of immigrants. If you are not a Native American you came from somewhere else sometime in your family history.Dear Panteras... I fancy myself as being aware of most all stories concerning Pittsburgh and its reputation. This one is new to me and as good as any I've ever heard!!! So cool!
BTW - it is reminiscent of the story about German soldiers manning the defenses on the shores of the Normandy coastline the morning of the D-Day invasion. They saw the vast armada arrayed on the ocean's horizon and many realized then, in the face of an enemy who could produce that sort of materiel, that the could NEVER win.
At the Tehran Conference in 1943, Stalin acknowledged to FDR that the Soviets never could have held out against the Germans without the vast "Lend Lease" armaments and goods shipped to Russia.
I bring those points up because while America was Roosevelt's "Great arsenal of Democracy"... Pittsburgh was America's arsenal. And, as usual, that prodigious effort left this region worn, tattered and in 1945, nearly shattered. I deeply resent jokes about Pittsburgh and its smokey heritage. This city built and saved this nation more than once.
You have it wrong.Pittsburgh and in fact this country was built on the backs of immigrants. If you are not a Native American you came from somewhere else sometime in your family history.
And now we have people trying to keep good people out thru fear tactics.
Yes, the Germans, Irish, Italians and Polish immediately integrated. They never considered having their own churches.You have it wrong.
We're trying to make sure its the good people who get in and we're trying to be sure we keep the bad people out.
This is called managing and enforcing the immigration process as it was designed. Most people support Legal immigration as opposed to illegal immigration!
America stopped the immigration process from approx. 1925 to 1965. The reason was so the immigrants who came in legallly prior to 1925 had time to learn the language, assimulate, gain skills, get jobs or improve their job status, learn the laws of their new country and become part of America.
Immigration was restarted around 1965.
Unfortunately today many immigrants are here illegally.
Both legal and illegal immirgrants aren't learning the language like their predecesors, aren't assimulating, aren't gaining education or skills, or securing good jobs, or starting businesses like the immigrants who came her before them.
Without English language skills there's very limited opportunity in America.
Instead the new immigrants live in countries within a country which wasn't the intent of the original immigration process!
"it's five o'clock somewhere"
Signed: Mr Buffett
Go PITT & CSU Rams!
I don't get your point. All of those people/groups did become part of America, learning it's language, customs, culture, and making it a better place.Yes, the Germans, Irish, Italians and Polish immediately integrated. They never considered having their own churches.
Yes, the Germans, Irish, Italians and Polish immediately integrated. They never considered having their own churches.
My point is assimilation does and did take time.I don't get your point. All of those people/groups did become part of America, learning it's language, customs, culture, and making it a better place.
The majority call themselves Americans with an ethnic legacy.
The highlighted sentences are what I was referring to.
When people who just arrive in America live in a country within a country and never learn the language, customs, laws, etc they will never be Americans.
Immigrant assimilation definition Assimilation is the act of absorbing, taking in, or incorporating [something] as one's own. Regarding immigration, and usually culture in general, reformers usually advocate a…ssimilation in order to promote a sense of ownership within the context of the new country.
"it's five o'clock somewhere"
Signed: Mr Buffett
Go PITT & CSU Rams!
I agree that’s what we have been doing. Up until a little over a year ago. As far as opportunity, don’t forget the immigrants who come here to do the jobs you and I don’t want to do. It’s not a simple problem. And you can’t lump all immigrants into one column. I don’t care for the attitude “ I’m already here so screw you. Get out”. JMOYou have it wrong.
We're trying to make sure its the good people who get in and we're trying to be sure we keep the bad people out.
This is called managing and enforcing the immigration process as it was designed. Most people support Legal immigration as opposed to illegal immigration!
America stopped the immigration process from approx. 1925 to 1965. The reason was so the immigrants who came in legallly prior to 1925 had time to learn the language, assimulate, gain skills, get jobs or improve their job status, learn the laws of their new country and become part of America.
Immigration was restarted around 1965.
Unfortunately today many immigrants are here illegally.
Both legal and illegal immirgrants aren't learning the language like their predecesors, aren't assimulating, aren't gaining education or skills, or securing good jobs, or starting businesses like the immigrants who came her before them.
Without English language skills there's very limited opportunity in America.
Instead the new immigrants live in countries within a country which wasn't the intent of the original immigration process!
"it's five o'clock somewhere"
Signed: Mr Buffett
Go PITT & CSU Rams!
I am all for immigration reform. However, of course it has to be bipartisan. Both sides are going to have to relent on some of their primary goals and neither side is good at compromise. They are both going to have to get good at it because the Democrats are about to kick the Republicans’ asses in the midterms.
The GOP is making the exact same mistake that the Democrats made when Obama won the presidency and they arrogantly pissed away their short-lived advantage while the other side became very energized.
Before anyone cheers me or jeers me, please know that I hate them both, so I take no joy in saying that. However, Helen Keller could read the writing on this wall. The entire complexion of Congress is about to change. The only question is by how much?
I am absolutely for reinforcing the technology that enforces our visa program. Approximately 85% of illegal immigrants just overstay their visas. That’s where that money needs to go.
I am 100% against some boneheaded multi-billion symbolic middle finger to the Democrats so that the president can have his ego massaged and keep a campaign promise that everyone knew at the time was never going to happen.
Just think about how much money it will cost to build something like that and then to maintain it. You’re telling me that money could not be spent better elsewhere? BS! We could spend all that money on cigarettes and lottery tickets and it would be a better use of those resources.
And the worst part is anyone with a brain knows full well that eventually we’re going to tear the whole goddamn thing down anyway. Neither party rules forever.
So instead of throwing good money after bad, let’s spend our money like adults and on sophisticated programs, not something like China would’ve built in the second century to keep out the goddamn Huns.
You have it wrong.
We're trying to make sure its the good people who get in and we're trying to be sure we keep the bad people out.
This is called managing and enforcing the immigration process as it was designed. Most people support Legal immigration as opposed to illegal immigration!
America stopped the immigration process from approx. 1925 to 1965. The reason was so the immigrants who came in legallly prior to 1925 had time to learn the language, assimulate, gain skills, get jobs or improve their job status, learn the laws of their new country and become part of America.
Immigration was restarted around 1965.
Unfortunately today many immigrants are here illegally.
Both legal and illegal immirgrants aren't learning the language like their predecesors, aren't assimulating, aren't gaining education or skills, or securing good jobs, or starting businesses like the immigrants who came her before them.
Without English language skills there's very limited opportunity in America.
Instead the new immigrants live in countries within a country which wasn't the intent of the original immigration process!
"it's five o'clock somewhere"
Signed: Mr Buffett
Go PITT & CSU Rams!