You are right, that is not how it is going to be interpreted by an administration which has no one that was there 40, 30, 20 years ago. Because at other athletic departments, the support will come regardless. See Nebraska. So the only way it is going to be interpreted is that the small, uninvested, and uninterested fan base isn't worth plowing the $45 million from university general revenue fund to subsidize the athletic department's $121 m in annual operating expenses (FY24 #s...that places Pitt in the top 30-40 of athletic departments in expenditures).Yea, a significant portion of the fan base is delivering a message to the university. You just have misinterpreted the message which is: “ until you demonstrate that you have a clue on running a successful athletics department, we’re not investing in YOU because for 40 years all you have given us is incompetence and indifference, as reflected in the quality of the university’s major sports teams, which continues to be the case until this very moment.”
Last edited: