lol at your first sentence, it’s exactly what i say about Pitt sports (and the Pirates), and I’m shouted down, that somehow it’s ridiculous that Pitt should be genuinely trying to compete for national championships; we should just enjoy the “experience”.
But then, College Football (similar to MLB) is meant by design to reward the big money behemoths and punish the lesser programs.
My point was that the NFL has the ideal of everyone being able to beat anyone else “any given Sunday”. The Steelers don’t seem to be that entirely bereft this season that they can’t put up 6-7 wins or so, because many of their pending opponents have their own holes and issues (or might merely have a bad day, as Cincinnati had in game 1). I’m older and I’ve seen some seasons in the late 80s and early 90s that the team started out far worse (if that can be believed) but pulled out some wins later due to league parity.
You are right that “No losing season” is an increasingly hollow accolade when (1) the sport is designed so most should finish around .500; (2) there have been so many quick exits in the post season. Especially in the frequent years that the coach had not only a HOF QB (discount his last couple seasons when he was washed up), but also a HOF WR (at least until he went insane), an outstanding RB (ditto) multiple Pro Bowl OL, a HOF DT and Safety. Other teams obviously have some good players as well (again, by design) but those guys should have been good for more 2 playoff wins in over a decade.
Tomlin found his way into the SB a couple times (but with so many SB that fraternity grows less exclusive each year). As the years go by that they constantly flunk out in the first round, that light gets dimmer and dimmer. I think the guy is a fine coach who is probably a little too comfortable now, and would benefit from a change in scenery soon. But it’ll totally be on his terms, the team and media won’t touch him.