Aren't they also eliminating divisions? It'll become doubly less meaningful, especially in years they play each other two weeks in a row. They may even start resting guys in The Game for a round two, which was unthinkable.
Yep divisions will be gone.
Yeah, the whole conference is a joke.
Yeah but we are aware the ACC sucks. Big 10 fans think their conference is elite.
I hear what you’re saying, but I get the feeling there are a lot on the lair that think ACC football is far superior to the Big 10.
Who in the blue hell thinks the ACC is far superior to the B10?
Are you only curious as to why Slick doesn’t think FSU is at the Mich/OSU level? Or are you also interested in knowing why entire the rest of the world feels that way as well?
That’s a shame-but don’t get too discouraged. There’s medication and therapy available that can help you with that memory issue.
This Pitt team wouldn’t get 4 first downs or cross midfield against this Iowa team. And the Pitt D is no better than most of Iowa’s opponents, so Iowa would get its usual number and win like 17-0.
Louisville was 10-1 and lost at home to an average 6-5 SEC team to finish 10-2. I understand rivalry games are wild cards, but do you think that is a good look for the 2nd best team losing to an average SEC team? In anticipation of your next question, yes I believe Iowa would beat Kentucky in the typical Iowa way with like a 14-10 score.
I did a quick look, not sure how credible the one I looked at but Iowa had a sos of 47 and Pitt had a sos of 51. Not much difference.
Slightly better? You must be kidding.
Purdue, Indiana, and MSU aren't very good. Nevertheless, games against them would be pick'em games for us this year. The rest of the Big Ten teams would handle us easily, this year. And that includes Rutgers, unfortunately.
Those teams stink but I would not assume this year's Pitt teams beat them either. They would be toss up games against every bottom of the barrel B10 team.
