I just have to rely on the reports that are out there. I don't have any information to make up my own.That's the point we are making - people are just making things up! Psst...the nature of the internet!!
I just have to rely on the reports that are out there. I don't have any information to make up my own.That's the point we are making - people are just making things up! Psst...the nature of the internet!!
Who do you hate? For one thing, you seem to hate people who criticize Joe Paterno. That's based on your posts - you said you stopped listening to Mueller on the Fan (and said "F that loser") when he badmouthed Paterno. The set of people so defensive of Paterno aren't usually fond of Pitt or its players.You're putting words in my mouth.
Who do I hate?
I'm just pointing out people are making things up out of thin air. That is what was reported about fields. I have no inside or contradictory information to those reports. Do you?
My point about Wilson was that of course nobody would've paid more than the league minimum to reduce the burden on the Broncos. That would be malpractice.
All I said about Pickett is that it's reasonable to assume that people are going to be unhappy with him asking to be traded based on EVERY SINGLE TIME anyone else has done the same.
Personally, I think it was stupid to get rid of both Pickett and Rudolph. I assume they wanted to keep Pickett, but Tomlin stuck to his whole volunteers not hostages thing.
And nobody here knows what's made up and what isn't, nobody here was in the locker room, so nobody hare can definitively say that they are smearing Kenny with fake stories, when you can't know for sure if they are fake or not.That's the point we are making - people are just making things up! Psst...the nature of the internet!!
The people reporting it wasn't in the locker room and in those discussions either! So who do you think they are getting that information from - this isn't that hard.And nobody here knows what's made up and what isn't, nobody here was in the locker room, so nobody hare can definitively say that they are smearing Kenny with fake stories, when you can't know for sure if they are fake or not.
Sometimes you have to do some reasonable deducing.I just have to rely on the reports that are out there. I don't have any information to make up my own.
Exactly. I don't know and you don't know. This is why you are arguing the wrong thing.How do you know he isn't; everyone is always thrilled to paint Pickens or Johnson or Claypool or Wilson as the "cancer in the locker room" how can you be sure it's not Kenny? I don't know about any of that I've never been in the locker room, but so many here are so adamant about who's the problem and who isn't, have you all been in the locker room?
EXACTLY!!! That's my issue - the smear campaign.Exactly. I don't know and you don't know. This is why you are arguing the wrong thing.
I don't care what happened behind the scenes, or on the field or anything else. I am saying that it is not ok to systematically attack someone's character in the media.
This is why you disagree so much, because you don't even know what you are arguing about.
I don't know? But they are more likely to know someone that was in the locker room than random people like us, so I can't tell you if it's made up or not with certainty.The people reporting it wasn't in the locker room and in those discussions either! So who do you think they are getting that information from - this isn't that hard.
He is a loser Ped St troll who frequents the Pitt Site!Who do you hate? For one thing, you seem to hate people who criticize Joe Paterno. That's based on your posts - you said you stopped listening to Mueller on the Fan (and said "F that loser") when he badmouthed Paterno. The set of people so defensive of Paterno aren't usually fond of Pitt or its players.
My contradictory information about the Fields trade is common sense and the fact that the NFL is very big business. And you ask for contradictory or inside information to refute a ludicrous rumor that the Bears turned down an attractive trade just to basically give Fields away, but then take on faith negative rumors about Pickett. Not exactly consistent or fair.
Do you agree that this applies to Pickens as much as Pickett? Is it wrong to systematically portray Pickens as a head case diva that we need to dump?I don't care what happened behind the scenes, or on the field or anything else. I am saying that it is not ok to systematically attack someone's character in the media.
You should become a reporter then since your common sense trumps the information that is out thereWho do you hate? For one thing, you seem to hate people who criticize Joe Paterno. That's based on your posts - you said you stopped listening to Mueller on the Fan (and said "F that loser") when he badmouthed Paterno. The set of people so defensive of Paterno aren't usually fond of Pitt or its players.
My contradictory information about the Fields trade is common sense and the fact that the NFL is very big business. And you ask for contradictory or inside information to refute a ludicrous rumor that the Bears turned down an attractive trade just to basically give Fields away, but then take on faith negative rumors about Pickett. Not exactly consistent or fair.
Okay - I'm not going to keep going down this rabbit hole with you.I don't know? But they are more likely to know someone that was in the locker room than random people like us, so I can't tell you if it's made up or not with certainty.
That's because I'm right.Okay - I'm not going to keep going down this rabbit hole with you.
I bet you think this song is about you...That's because I'm right.
Incorrect."They inquired and went with Picket who costs more. So clearly the eagles think pickets better"
No, this isn't accurate. Several teams inquired about acquiring Fields as their backup QB. They saw his 5th year option sitting out there at $25.7 million dollars that has to be exercised in May, and felt that was too much $ for a backup.
So, no. KP was not a more expensive option to Philly.
No one should take the Bears' word at face value. The Steelers got a 3rd and two 7ths for Kenny. The Bears got what is likely to remain a 6th for Fields. The trade value disparity between those two picks is approx the value of an early 4th.Go look up Fields. The Bears said they turned down better offers to honor Fields wishes of teams he wanted to play for.
Pickett is also much, much cheaper if his option gets picked up. If he remains a backup, he can also stay in Philly for a pretty comfortable price and become their Charlie Batch.Incorrect.
There were 2 aspects to Fields' cost: salary and trade cost.
His salary is $3.3m for 2024 only. Teams do not have to pay the $25m option in 2025. It is a team option. It can and will be declined.
His trade cost was what matters. If the Eagles wanted Fields, they either: a) didn't want him at the Bears' asking price; or b) valued Pickett higher. We don't know which of these is true. It could be that the Bears wanted a 2nd round pick for Fields and the Eagles went with Pickett. It could be that they thought Pickett at his price was worth more than Fields for a 6th. Personally, I believe that the Bears originally wanted a lot more for Fields than the Steelers asked for Pickett, and they sold low once Pickett was traded because at that point, there were few, if any, teams left that wanted Fields at all.
Well, sometimes you find that some people aren’t interested in facts.EXACTLY!!! That's my issue - the smear campaign.
It can and will be declined, but then Fields is a FA. If a team is set on him as their backup for more than one year, they either have to exercise the option, a guaranteed way to keep him, or negotiate an extension that is acceptable to both parties.Incorrect.
There were 2 aspects to Fields' cost: salary and trade cost.
His salary is $3.3m for 2024 only. Teams do not have to pay the $25m option in 2025. It is a team option. It can and will be declined.
His trade cost was what matters. If the Eagles wanted Fields, they either: a) didn't want him at the Bears' asking price; or b) valued Pickett higher. We don't know which of these is true. It could be that the Bears wanted a 2nd round pick for Fields and the Eagles went with Pickett. It could be that they thought Pickett at his price was worth more than Fields for a 6th. Personally, I believe that the Bears originally wanted a lot more for Fields than the Steelers asked for Pickett, and they sold low once Pickett was traded because at that point, there were few, if any, teams left that wanted Fields at all.
Yeah the 2 years of control versus 1 are huge, but the $25 million option is more palatable in 2026 versus 2025 because the cap will go up again.Pickett is also much, much cheaper if his option gets picked up. If he remains a backup, he can also stay in Philly for a pretty comfortable price and become their Charlie Batch.
There probably isn't a plausible scenario where the Steelers pick up his option. Best case, they offer him the starting job for 2025 but only if he negotiates a new deal before the option deadline but there are a lot of boxes that have to be checked by both sides to do that.Yeah the 2 years of control versus 1 are huge, but the $25 million option is more palatable in 2026 versus 2025 because the cap will go up again.
In any event, I also think teams would prefer to have Pickett as a backup compared to Fields. He fits more what they are looking for (i.e., can win the game and probably won't be the sole reason they lose versus might have the game of the week but more likely to throw for 200 yards and 3 turnovers).
I don't think they got him to be the backup for a year. I think that they think he can be the QB of the future and will somehow keep him beyond 2024 to try. I'm not saying he'll be good or bad, I never wanted him, but I think this is what they want to try.There probably isn't a plausible scenario where the Steelers pick up his option. Best case, they offer him the starting job for 2025 but only if he negotiates a new deal before the option deadline but there are a lot of boxes that have to be checked by both sides to do that.
If he's the QB of the future, why use him as a backup? They'll be flying blind into that decision unless the guy is drunk and signs a very club friendly deal that sees him give up a chance to shop around or not cash in on a $25 million.I don't think they got him to be the backup for a year. I think that they think he can be the QB of the future and will somehow keep him beyond 2024 to try. I'm not saying he'll be good or bad, I never wanted him, but I think this is what they want to try.
If Wilson stinks it up, or Fields just outperforms him in camp, etc., they can simply dump Wilson. It costs them virtually NOTHING.If he's the QB of the future, why use him as a backup? They'll be flying blind into that decision unless the guy is drunk and signs a very club friendly deal that sees him give up a chance to shop around or not cash in on a $25 million.
Yet you believe it LOLI don't know? But they are more likely to know someone that was in the locker room than random people like us, so I can't tell you if it's made up or not with certainty.
That was my point to freeport. No on in their right mind was extending him. The $25M was not a factor in the lack of interest. Hell be extended at a club favorable rateIn fairness, nobody was picking up the $25m option on fields. Didn't matter where he went, that option was never getting exercised. He's on a one year contract for the Steelers and would have been for any other team as well.
So you think they just are using him as a stopgap, one year backup? Believe what you want, I think their intent or hope is that he develops into a long-term option, they probably intend to have at least a package of plays for him to get him on the field this year regularly.If he's the QB of the future, why use him as a backup? They'll be flying blind into that decision unless the guy is drunk and signs a very club friendly deal that sees him give up a chance to shop around or not cash in on a $25 million.
Yet you don't believe it. But we all know that's because Kenny is a Pitt guy and if he was from Penn State you'd be the one making up stories and leading a smear campaign.Yet you believe it LOL
Who is moving the goal posts. If Wilson was such a great starting option, some team other than the Steelers would have been interested and offered him a better contract. The fact is NO OTHER TEAM wanted him as a starter. The Steelers did and had no competition signing him. In a league where winning Qbs are at a premium, no one signs a starting QB for the league minimum unless NO other team sees him as a starter. This isnt hard.Move the goalposts, but I'll play along. Why would a team sign Wilson for more than the minimum? If someone told you that a house cost 30 million and you could pay 1 million and they'd pick up the other 29, would you say no no no, I'll pay 15 million and so you only have to pay 15 million? You'd be the dumbest person alive. If any NFL GM did that, they'd be delivering pizza the next day. You apparently don't even understand the situation.
And you are the one acting like we owe Kenny something. You.
Go look up Fields. The Bears said they turned down better offers to honor Fields wishes of teams he wanted to play for.
And Kenny didn't have public support. Leave your echo chamber every once in a while. All the pills I've seen from the local players show about 10-20 percent local support for Pickett
I have not done that. Show me where I've participated in any of the PSU nonsense. Nice try.Yet you don't believe it. But we all know that's because Kenny is a Pitt guy and if he was from Penn State you'd be the one making up stories and leading a smear campaign.
There is absolutely no chance the Steelers pick up his option. Even less than no chance if that's possible.If Wilson stinks it up, or Fields just outperforms him in camp, etc., they can simply dump Wilson. It costs them virtually NOTHING.
I imagine Fields will play this season. They will have packages designed for him. Perhaps they hope he doesn't exceed 50% of the plays, otherwise it costs them a better draft choice.
Remember the option has to be exercised by May, so there will be no time to evaluate his play. I'd guess they'll approach him with an extension to kill the option.
If they exercise the option, it gives them Fields for this year and next at an average price of $13 million. That's about the going rate for a mediocre starter/backup in the NFL.
That would give them a year to see what they have.
His skill set and athleticism seem to fit Smith's offensive style. He is an athletic specimen. Steelers rolling the dice a bit, but a decent gamble.
How do you believe that part of it, but nothing negative about Kenny?Now heres whats been reported and my opinion.
The steelers were reported to be interested in Fields Long before they signed Russ.
The Steelers told KP that Russ would be the starter. KP had no issues with competing for the job. However when your told the other guy is the starter they clearly have no plans for you. Combined with the story about the team saying they were ready to sign Rudy and then they backed out, KP decided it was best to move on , given how toxic the fan base and media were towards him.
Im not contending that KP asked to be traded. Im just saying he saw the handwriting on the wall and made a business decision that is no different than the Steelers did. Yinzers seem to be butt hurt about the guy they hated or didnt want leaving them like jilted lovers. End of storyHow do you believe that part of it, but nothing negative about Kenny?
I never thought highly of him, but I think Tomlin and the Steelers do and want to try to make him into a franchise QB, or why bother trading for him?I feel pretty confident saying you will never win consistently with Justin Fields at QB.
I mean the other stuff, like him refusing to dress as the emergency QB for example?Im not contending that KP asked to be traded. Im just saying he saw the handwriting on the wall and made a business decision that is no different than the Steelers did. Yinzers seem to be butt hurt about the guy they hated or didnt want leaving them like jilted lovers. End of story
Thats been debunked and is irrelevent. Hes gone. Why does it matter to you so much?I mean the other stuff, like him refusing to dress as the emergency QB for example?
I mean the other stuff, like him refusing to dress as the emergency QB for example?
Yet you don't believe it. But we all know that's because Kenny is a Pitt guy and if he was from Penn State you'd be the one making up stories and leading a smear campaign.