These West Virginia fans need help.

Login to view embedded media

Of the under center QB sneak with the tush push?

*Disappointing loss in a winnable game, but a gutsy performance. We’ve pulled out wins at the end of a few games this year, but couldn’t finish it off today.

*This game for some reason reminded me of the Tennessee game in 2022

*A few boneheaded posters mocked Yarnell last week especially one particular poster, but he played really well. Best quarterbacking in weeks. 34/54 350 yards. 1 TD and a last play interception.

*OL is horrible and the reason we lost today. The number position to go after in the portal.

*In addition to the OL, we had too many penalties. A couple of them were bullsh@t calls, but nonetheless contributed to the loss.

*The defense played great, especially in the second half. Louis is an All-American if there is any credibility left.

*Too bad Daniel Carter got hurt. The staff finally decided to give him the ball more, and he gets hurt.

*Reid looked much better than he has in a while. Too bad he got tripped up on the long pass. He would have easily scored a touchdown

*Coaching… Well, it was spotty on the offensive side of the ball. Enough has been said already on other threads. But I will say they need to get the OL on the same page, fast. Giving up 8 sacks and constant pressure will make any offense sputter. Yarnell did great under those conditions.

Looking forward to seeing this....Pitt has to keep pace with Nebraska who beat #16 Minnesota last night. A few interesting things about FS...

• They have lost 6 matches this season and took Louisville to 5 sets before losing
• They have only been swept once....by Virginia...who Pitt destroyed 2 weeks ago
• They have lost 27 sets....30% of the sets they have played
• Their stat sheet is respectable....17.6 points scored/set (Pitt is 18.9). Points given back due to errors is 7.7 (Pitt 6.4)
• Their two stars are MB Khori Louis (hits .413%) and OH Audrey Koenig (3.74 kills/set)
• Pitt has swept 20 opponents this season and only lost 7 sets total all season.

who's got it?

1. Today was a microcosm of the season. Didn't think a close loss to Clemson could feel disappointing. Pitt found a way to make it such. Didn't think 7-3 would feel disappointing. Pitt found a way to make it such.

2. I'm so sick of saying this, but the end of the game is not like the other 58 minutes. It's just not. Offenses often find ways to score when they NEED to score. See: Kenny Pickett. Also, they mostly use 4 downs, not 3. So if you stopped them for 58 minutes, that doesn't mean you'll continue to do so. You can't rely on your defense like that. Should have been more aggressive on 1st and 2nd downs.

3. Conspiracy theory: Nate Yarnell lost the starting job, put on a pout, and didn't bother to educate himself on this offense. What an embarrassing lack of command of this offense. I've seen tighter Spring games. Overall play wasn't bad, but just no command.

4. We needed to ensure Clemson did not get the ball back in the first half. We burned through the clock, were gifted a roughing the passer penalty (not saying the call was wrong; just saying it gave us a mulligan), and then burned through it again. Clemson says thank you for the 3.

5. These safeties suck in coverage.

6. You could get by with these FCS receivers against atrocious secondaries. But wow - they've come back to Earth fast. Does Poppi need contacts? It's like he doesn't even see the ball. Not just talking about the one the defender screened him from seeing.

7. What do you even say about this O line?

8. I'm turning into a nihilist when it comes to college football. Now that the bowl games have become even more meaningless, it feels like you're either part of the show (CFP) or you're not. At least the divisional format gave us a mini marker to strive for in winning the Coastal. Now, 6-6... 7-5... 8-4... I'm starting to cares less about the difference between them, and I see no path where Pitt gets over that hump. Next year's schedule is tough.

What was supposed to be a strength for this defense this year, looks to be a liability. Especially, yesterday. The two pass touchdowns for Clemson yestreday were a breakdown in the coverage scheme by the safeties. Two post patterns down the middle yesterday cost this team, big time.

Earlier today, I sat down to find out about something:

Is Pitt taking the ball when it wins the coin toss more this season than in the past?

Well, there was only one way to find out: go through every one of Pitt's 124 games with Pat Narduzzi as head coach, tally them all up and see what comes out. The result, as you might have guessed, is that yes, Pitt is taking the ball more this year than in previous years. By a lot.

Here are numbers:

- Pitt has won the coin toss 58 times in the Narduzzi era.

- Of those 58 wins, Pitt has taken the ball 8 times.

- That's not that crazy; most teams do opt to defer. For example, Pitt's opponents since 2015 have won the coin toss 66 times and taken the ball 13 times. So Narduzzi is more or less in line with that.

- However, this year is especially notable. Pitt has won the coin toss 6 times this season and taken the ball on 4 of those.

- So 8 total times in almost 10 full seasons, and 4 of those 8 have come this season.

- Incidentally, the four game-opening drives when Pitt took the ball produced 3 punts and 1 touchdown (the touchdown came against Youngstown State).

- Prior to this season, the last time Pitt took the ball after winning the toss was the Georgia Tech game in Week Three of the 2018 season.

- That's 5 full seasons (2019-23) when Pitt deferred every time it won the toss. Until this year.

- So what changed? I asked Narduzzi today. Here's what he said:

"We sit in our staff meeting…and we talk every week, like, ‘What do we want to do?’ It's based on who we're playing. I'm not gonna tell you what we're going to do, but, you know, the vast majority of guys in here say, ‘Let's take the ball, let's go down and score, let's be aggressive.’

“You know, Michigan State, you can count them up there, go back and count and if we win the coin toss, I bet you there's not one time we ever didn't take the ball. You know, we started off young and, defensively, we said, ‘Let's take the offense, going to score some points, we're going fast, let's go get up on people, and it's great.’ I tell you what, it's fun to play defense when it's 7-0, but, you know, I think it's a feel thing, it's a weather thing, it's a wind thing.

“If you think you're getting second half wind, wind and rain, so there's a lot of things that go into it. I do want to get the ball down to the Panther Pitt in the fourth quarter. That's one thing I want. Big plays are made in that Panther Pitt area, so we'd like to be down there, a lot of memorable plays down there.”

- I don't know if that clears anything up, other than to say the offensive staff is encouraging Narduzzi to take the ball.

- On a different note, in 63 games over those 5 seasons from 2019-23, Pitt only won the toss 25 times. Pitt won the toss just 2 times in 11 games in 2020 and 4 times in 14 games in 2021. Pitt lost the coin toss in each of the first 9 games of the 2019 season and the final 9 games of the 2020 season.

- The opening drives of Pitt's 124 games under Narduzzi - for both teams - have produced 60 punts, 34 touchdowns (including 3 kick return touchdowns - 2 by Pitt and 1 by UNC in 2017), 16 field goals, 5 interceptions, 4 fumbles and 3 turnovers on downs, 1 safety (New Hampshire in 2021) and 1 missed field goal. So 50 out of 124 (40.3%) resulted in points for the team that got the ball on the game-opening drive.

- Pitt is equally unlucky at winning the coin toss at home and on the road. At home, Pitt has won the coin toss 31 times and lost 36. On the road, the W-L is 27-30.

- That includes 8 neutral-field games (6 bowls and 2 ACC Championship Games). Pitt has been the road team in 6 of those neutral field games (the 2015 Military Bowl, the 2016 Pinstripe Bowl, the 2019 Quick Lane Bowl, the 2021 ACC Championship Game, the 2021 Peach Bowl and the 2022 Sun Bowl). Pitt was the home team in the 2018 ACC Championship Game and the 2018 Sun Bowl.

- Pitt is 2-4 as the road team in neutral-field coin tosses and 1-1 as the home team in such games. On all 3 of Pitt's neutral-field coin toss wins, the Panthers deferred (2019 Eastern Michigan scored a field goal, 2018 Clemson scored a touchdown and 2016 Northwestern punted).

- Narduzzi has taken the ball after winning the toss on the road 2 times since 2015, and both were at Georgia Tech (2015 and 2017). Both of those drives resulted in touchdowns.

Pitt's final home game of the season will be a big one, as the Panthers host Clemson for a noon kickoff at Acrisure Stadium.

With a big game on tap, the Pitt coaches have a big group of recruits expected to be in attendance. We've confirmed more than 25 targets, commits and prospects who will be at the game tomorrow; here's a rundown of who we've confirmed.

Login to view embedded media
Hilson is the highest-rated recruit visiting Pitt this weekend as a five-star prospect who ranks as the No. 1 defensive tackle prospect in the nation and the No. 16 overall recruit in the class. He decommitted from Florida State in September; prior to committing to the Seminoles, he took official visits to Florida, Texas and UCF, and it looks like Syracuse is in consideration as well.

Hilson's connection to Pitt is through James Folston, the former Pitt defensive end who is one of his coaches at Cocoa High School in Florida. That's likely how he ended up taking an unofficial visit to Pitt last January (2023) and why he's returning for an official visit this weekend.

That said, I'm not sure I see Hilson ending up at Pitt. I'm not sure where he'll go, but it seems unlikely that he will be a Panther. Still, it's never a bad thing to have a five-star prospect on campus.

Pitt will also be hosting these recruits from the 2026 class; they all have offers from the Panthers.

Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media

A bunch of news, notes and other things from Pitt's 24-20 loss to Clemson:



- Both teams had four scoring drives. The difference was that Clemson had three touchdowns and one field goal; Pitt had two touchdowns and two field goals.

- The Panthers’ first field goal drive saw the offense march to the Clemson 1 before three straight procedure penalties resulted in third-and-goal from the 16.

On the other field goal drive, the offense got into the red zone but a false start on second-and-9 from the 16 led the coaches to lay up for a field goal that only gave the Panthers a three-point lead.

- Ultimately, if Pitt scores from the 1 instead of taking three procedure penalties in a row, the Panthers likely find themselves driving for a field goal in the final minute of the game rather than a touchdown, which would have given them a much higher chance of winning.

- Before scoring on three consecutive drives in the fourth quarter, Pitt’s offense had stalled between the 40’s on of its first 10 drives (not including a one-play drive before halftime). This mostly happened because the Panthers were able to produce one big play on each of those drives - a 30-yard pass to Konata Mumpfield, a 17-yard pass to Daejon Reynolds, a 16-yard pass to Mumpfield and passes of 22 and 34 yards to Desmond Reid - but not much after that.

When Pitt finally broke through the 40’s, it did so by following a 27-yard pass to Kenny Johnson with a 12-yard pass to Reynolds and a 19-yard pass to Reid to set up a field goal and then turned good field position into a couple double-digit gains to set up the game-tying touchdown.

- That touchdown drive started at the Pitt 42 after a Clemson punt. Pitt and Clemson combined to punt 14 times in the game, with the Tigers punting eight times and the Panthers punting six. Six of Clemson’s eight punts pinned Pitt inside the 20 with two at the 10 or closer; three of Pitt’s six punts were at the 12 or closer.

- Pitt’s average starting position in the game was the 27; Clemson’s average starting position was the 26.

- Reid had a game-high 174 all-purpose yards against Clemson, his highest single-game total since he put up 210 yards at North Carolina. Against both the Tigers and the Tar Heels, he eclipsed 100 receiving yards to bolster his total.

- Mumpfield finished with 68 receiving yards; he had that same number in the loss at SMU, but he produced just 66 total receiving yards in the games against Cal, Syracuse and Virginia combined.

- After not scoring a touchdown in Pitt’s first eight games, Gavin Bartholomew has reached the end zone in back-to-back games.

- Nate Yarnell is now 2-2 all-time as a starter, with wins at Western Michigan in 2022 and vs. Boston College last season and a loss at Duke last year In his four starts, Yarnell has completed 65.8% of his passes for 1,001 yards, five touchdowns and two interceptions. His 350 passing yards against Clemson were a career high.

- Pitt lost two offensive players for the remainder of the season on Saturday. Pat Narduzzi said after the game that senior running back Daniel Carter and receiver Censere Lee will be done for the year due to injuries they sustained against Clemson.

- Pitt used its fifth different starting offensive line on Saturday, going with Ryan Baer at left tackle, Ryan Jacoby at left guard, Lyndon Cooper at center, B.J. Williams at right guard and Jackson Brown (in his first start) at right tackle.

The line’s issues were further compounded when Jacoby and Cooper both left the game with injuries. Jacoby was replaced at left guard by Jason Collier and Cooper was replaced at center by Terrence Moore.

- Defensively, Pitt was led by Donovan McMillon, Kyle Louis and Rasheem Biles, who each had seven tackles. Louis also had 3.5 tackles for loss and two sacks, while Biles added 1.5 tackles for loss.

Louis has recorded six or more tackles in nine of Pitt’s 10 games this season; he has at least one tackle for loss in seven of 10 games; and he has at least one sack in six of 10 games. Similarly, Biles has recorded at least one tackle for loss in eight of 10 games.

- Pitt also got tackles for loss against Clemson from Braylan Lovelace, Brandon George, Tamon Lynum, Sean FitzSimmons, Nate Matlack, Jimmy Scott, Sincere Edwards and Nick James. The Panthers’ 13 tackles for loss against Clemson were a season high; they had 12 against Kent State and 11 against Cal.

- The 13 tackles for loss were also the most by Pitt’s defense in a single game since 2020. That year, the Panthers topped out at 15 tackles for loss in the loss at Miami, but that defense - led by All-America defensive ends Rashad Weaver and Patrick Jones - was fairly ridiculous at making plays behind the line of scrimmage; Pitt had double-digit tackles for loss in six of 11 games that season and recorded eight in two other games.

Just look at this production:

Hearing Jackson Brown may be getting the nod at RT today. We’ll confirm that during warmups.

If you have extra tickets for a game or you're looking for extras, post here and see what you can work out. We'll pin this thread for the season so it's easily findable.

As always, be mindful of who you're buying from; we can't accept any responsibility for transactions that happen here.

If you told me at the beginning of the season that they'd be 7-3, I'd take it but it does sting after their great start. I try and see the positives, so let's finish 9-3. Hail to Pitt!!

We are giving Pantherlair members early access to our Black Friday Sale. Use BF20 for 20%

Backshore has revamped the trucker hat - a modern twist on a classic favorite. Our innovative, laser cut hats are crafted from moisture-wicking fabrics, ensuring they are lightweight and breathable. Experience the ultimate durability and unique floating feature when you select a Backshore hat.

In addition to the hats; Backshore Beach Tech Hoodies an T-shirts are the perfect combination of style and functionality. They are crafted with flex fabrics to keep you cool and shielded from harmful sun rays. The breathable material ensures you feel fresh all day long, while the stain-resistant protection keeps your hoodie looking new for longer. And let's not forget how incredibly soft they are.

2000 Pitt Grad, Alliance 412 Member and Backshore Apparel founder - Mike Romano

Not sure we’ve seen so many seemingly serious injuries as the past few games

1. We Pitt the bed too much
2. We have a midget league coach running the offense
3. We are undisciplined
4. Blitz, blitz blitz when we should be bending. Leading to quick breaks!
5. Our Head Coach has no clue, none about offense.


7-6 gents, 7-6

How many times do we Pitt fans need to see a series of downs like we just witnessed? 1st and goal from the 2 and the best we got was a 30 yd field goal?

Pitt lost to Clemson at Acrisure Stadium on Saturday in a game that saw the Panthers lead with 96 seconds left. After the game, we went live for the Panther-Lair Post-Game to talk about the loss and more with comments and questions from Pitt fans.

I mean I guess I'm assuming the issue is a concussion but not even sure about that.

Just wondered if anyone on the board has any idea what his timeline is to play.

Man, this team just can't put anything completely together.

Login to view embedded media
yesterday saw all of it. defense plays great for awhile and then completely whiffs on a drive when it matters. the offense does the opposite - can't do anything until it matters.

the team executes some things well. and then you get pee-wee league mistakes. bell does some things well on offense. and then he's maddeningly horrible at others. WR's get open and make some nice plays - then they drop gimmes. the DL can't get pressure against bad teams. then they punch clemson's OL in the mouth. the defense is disciplined and is making great tackles. then at other times, you're scrathing your head as to what in the hell they're doing. talent + the injury situation = this should have been a loss by 2 td's. but somehow, we almost won against a good team. against a bad team last week, we looked like a bottom feeder.

however, i put this loss on the OC. the defense did plenty to win this game. giving up 3 yards of rushing outside of the last play is fantastic. holding your opponent to one TD in the 2nd half should get you a win.

bell's issues:
* you have to be able to get a play off w/out a penalty. ESPECIALLY after a TO or stoppage in play. good lord. pee-week league level, here.
* procedure penalties - come on, fellas. we had 3 guys who could have been called on one play. by some miracle, the refs didn't call anything. again, pee-wee league level execution.
* pass protection - the OL has it's struggles but come on, coach. leave someone in to block. have your TE chip someone. i, and others, posted 10 different ways to help your OL during the week so i'm not going to rehash it. but this is offensive coaching 101. he did almost none of it.
* first and goal from your 1.5 yard line has to be a TD. it just has to. there are no excuses for this.
* power runs - he's calling WAY too many plays as if he has the 1993 dallas cowboys offensive line.
* WR route trees - he calls WAY too many plays where the WR's needed 4+ seconds to get open downfield. peyton mannings's first OC in indianapolis after his rookie year: "1, 2, 3 - get rid of it." or it's a sack/int. that's it, coach - if your QB has 3 seconds or less, every route needs to stop at 3 seconds unless it's a decoy where you're trying to a defender from a zone/whatever.

i'm not exrtraplolating this any further than this season. but he simply has to better.

college football standings are a total mess this year. any decent two loss team is getting into the playoffs. it was right in front of us this year but the inconsistency is just killing this teams' chances.
two more games, pat. let's get this thing figured out and finish the season on a high note.

is this a score if he doesn't call timeout?

Being at the game yesterday, this seemed like the most life the offense has had in the past 5 games. I know it wasn't pretty but Yarnell seemed to figure some things out in the second half with Bell's offense. That being said, I think Yarnell gives this team the best chance to win out. As good as Holstein looked the first 6 games, he's looked that unsure of himself running this offense the last 3 games. Is that 2 concussions in 3 games? Probably. But Nate took serious shots yesterday and seems to still move this offense. Again, it wasn't pretty. Just wondering, what's Pitt's record would be with Yarnell starting game 1?

Hope he has a complete recovery. That looked ugly. Feel bad for him. Played well again today when given the opportunity and runs hard. Unfortunately he just can’t catch a break and stay healthy. I have always felt he deserved more of an opportunity the last two years. Seems like a solid teammate and hated to see his last year end like that.

If you know, you know. Surprised he didn't get punched.

My dad has given up on Narduzzi

There is no coming back from this*, mark my words

*until the next time pat wins a game

Although, if he sticks with this opinion... when he does that with a coach he's usually right. I think he might this time tbh. Sorry Pat