So my brother is biochemical engineer for the past 15 years and has developed vaccines for Pfizer and now Roche. He's a pretty smart cookie. While I was partying, he was getting his PhD @ 26 years of age.
So...
We have had dozens of conversations on covid over the past few months.
Last night he made a point that seems to be gaining traction in the science community.
He said, you can brag about every form of intervention and prevention known to science in terms of how to handle covid. But, covid's ultimate initial impact will boil down to 2 things - population fitness and previous intense upper respiratory (cold/flu) seasons. He said he believes this is the denominator that the media does not focus upon. I asked him if the United States handled it's outbreak like Germany or other "successful" countries would things be drastically different? He answered it like this -
1. If you have an old population with various comorbidity that population is going to get hit the hardest - we know that.
2. If you have a population with high comorbidity your going to get hit hard again - we know this.
3. If you have had previous severe cold/flu seasons, you will not get hit as hard - we are beginning to understand this.
He said no country/region is ready to handle a massive pandemic with poor susceptible populations. They will have casualties.
He said it's no coincidence that the countries, states, regions that have handled this pandemic the best who report honest #'s are the ones who've been dealt the best cards and not the intervention/prevention tactics. Countries/regions that have handled this the best have been broken down to having natural isolation (new zealand/australia), previous harsh flu/cold seasons (E. Europe), and younger, healthier populations (aka fitness).
He sent me me a short clip this morning on the topic
So...
We have had dozens of conversations on covid over the past few months.
Last night he made a point that seems to be gaining traction in the science community.
He said, you can brag about every form of intervention and prevention known to science in terms of how to handle covid. But, covid's ultimate initial impact will boil down to 2 things - population fitness and previous intense upper respiratory (cold/flu) seasons. He said he believes this is the denominator that the media does not focus upon. I asked him if the United States handled it's outbreak like Germany or other "successful" countries would things be drastically different? He answered it like this -
1. If you have an old population with various comorbidity that population is going to get hit the hardest - we know that.
2. If you have a population with high comorbidity your going to get hit hard again - we know this.
3. If you have had previous severe cold/flu seasons, you will not get hit as hard - we are beginning to understand this.
He said no country/region is ready to handle a massive pandemic with poor susceptible populations. They will have casualties.
He said it's no coincidence that the countries, states, regions that have handled this pandemic the best who report honest #'s are the ones who've been dealt the best cards and not the intervention/prevention tactics. Countries/regions that have handled this the best have been broken down to having natural isolation (new zealand/australia), previous harsh flu/cold seasons (E. Europe), and younger, healthier populations (aka fitness).
He sent me me a short clip this morning on the topic