LOL. So what exactly is Pitt paying its head coach 6 mill a year to do? Or more appropriately, Coach Narduzzi,Pitt coaches: fired.
Probably non as the outright starter entering camp. I think he could potentially win the job at Wake, Stanford, UVA, Duke, and Cal. I’m also not convinced Kyle McCord or Max Johnson are very good if not surrounded by multiple NFL draft picks. I guess we’ll find out.Realistically, how many ACC teams would he start for?
That’s a fair point. I think Yarnell’s accuracy on intermediate throws will be an asset in this offense.Everyone on this board: "Kedon Slovis sucked. Phil Jurkovec sucked. Christian Veilleux sucked."
Pitt coaches: Had Nate Yarnell behind all of them.
It's ill-advised to pencil him in as anything but a question mark at this point.
He wasn't even an outright starter at Pitt entering camp, bro. He wouldn't be an "outright starter entering camp" at most MAC schools based on his body of work to date. And he was an outright 3rd stringer behind two outright bums last year.Probably non as the outright starter entering camp. I think he could potentially win the job at Wake, Stanford, UVA, Duke, and Cal. I’m also not convinced Kyle McCord or Max Johnson are very good if not surrounded by multiple NFL draft picks. I guess we’ll find out.
It's also a choice to be realistic based on empirical data and fantasy based on well...............Its a choice to be optimistic or pessimistic. We always know what your choice is.
Realistically, how many ACC teams would he start for?
Probably non as the outright starter entering camp. I think he could potentially win the job at Wake, Stanford, UVA, Duke, and Cal. I’m also not convinced Kyle McCord or Max Johnson are very good if not surrounded by multiple NFL draft picks. I guess we’ll find out.
He doesn’t start over Murphy at Duke.
McCord is a solid QB. Just not a QB that should be starting at OSU.
I’m not certain I agree that McCord is even a solid QB. He has trouble working through progressions, throws at receivers feet way too often, is not good on the run. Give most P5 QBs Marvin Harrison Jr. and Emeka Egbuka and they put up good numbers.He doesn’t start over Murphy at Duke.
McCord is a solid QB. Just not a QB that should be starting at OSU.
Huh?He wasn't even an outright starter at Pitt entering camp, bro. He wouldn't be an "outright starter entering camp" at most MAC schools based on his body of work to date. And he was an outright 3rd stringer behind two outright bums last year.
Pretty sure most rational football industry types would take their chances with McCord over Yarndizzle right now. McCord started an entire season at a premium program and put up good numbers.
Yarn showed some positives in those last 2 games against underwhelming opponents. That's a reason to be hopeful about him this season, but nowhere near a big enough or impressive enough sample size to anoint him as a starter anywhere.
It seems that missed the Cignetti and staff being fired.LOL. So what exactly is Pitt paying its head coach 6 mill a year to do? Or more appropriately, Coach Narduzzi,
There is no empirical data on this year's team.It's also a choice to be realistic based on empirical data and fantasy based on well...............
I think they'll be 8-5 and Duzz gets a couple million raise. And the Bucs will win the World series.And the usual prophets of doom will be here to profess their negative wisdom.
The coaching staff that put Yarnell 3rd is gone.
You seemingly are unaware of the way the guy in the big chair operates. Let me help you:The guy in the big chair was not.
When it was apparent to anyone with even a semi-functioning brain last year after no more than two games that the guy they were playing wasn't up to the job, it was incumbent on the guy who sits in the big chair to make sure that a change got made. And he didn't.
As always, the buck stops with the guy at the top, not one of his middle managers.
You seemingly are unaware of the way the guy in the big chair operates. Let me help you:
And if there’s to be a switch at quarterback this week or in the future, it won’t be Narduzzi who will make that decision himself.
“I’m leaning on Frank (Cignetti Jr.) and the offensive staff to make the right decision and make decisions at every position,” Narduzzi said.
“I mean, those guys know better. I don’t sit in there. I spend 85% of my time in the defensive side of the room. In practice, I spend probably 85% of my time watching them because I know I’m going to watch it with the defense and watch it with the offense and making sure we’re getting what we need out there and seeing what the tempo of the practice is.”
I know what Narduzzi says. I also know who the boss is. If you want the head coach's salary you get the head coach's responsibilities. Whether you like it or not. A leader saying that it's someone else's call and not my fault is a leader who is ducking his responsibility. Or, if you prefer, not really a leader.
I guess you think that a HC should determine which player should be on the field at every position on every play, then. That seems a bit overly micro-managing to me. But the again, what would I know after a 30 year career in .... management.I know what Narduzzi says. I also know who the boss is. If you want the head coach's salary you get the head coach's responsibilities. Whether you like it or not. A leader saying that it's someone else's call and not my fault is a leader who is ducking his responsibility. Or, if you prefer, not really a leader.
I think Yarnell will be the least of our concerns. WR and DL have me worried a lot more.
We need splash plash, and WR and DL splash plays win you games. Nate just needs to get the ball out to the right place. He's capable of doing that.
I guess you think that a HC should determine which player should be on the field at every position on every play, then. That seems a bit overly micro-managing to me. But the again, what would I know after a 30 year career in .... management.
Lol. Yes. My opinion appeals to my own experience. The horrors!That’s an appeal to something!!!!!!
And yet you're proclaiming they're better than the rankings. How does work?You probably should wait for actual play to begin before jumping to conclusions based on preseason predictions from (ahem) "experts".
And yet you're proclaiming they're better than the rankings. How does work?
I guess you think that a HC should determine which player should be on the field at every position on every play, then. That seems a bit overly micro-managing to me. But the again, what would I know after a 30 year career in .... management.
Where did I do that?And yet you're proclaiming they're better than the rankings. How does work?
Then what did you say?That isn't what I said at all, but congratulations on knocking down that straw man. I get that even fighting a straw man can be hard for some people.
And lots aren't capable of being distributors.Lots of QBs are capable of being distributors. Doesn’t mean they aren’t a JAG.
Assuming NY can, is that still going to be enough to make the offense work? If the offensive personnel aren’t at a level where all it needs is a distributor at QB, should that be held against the QB or the rest of the personnel?
Post in thread 'AP Top 25 poll' https://pittsburgh.forums.rivals.com/threads/ap-top-25-poll.236701/post-4603154Where did I do that?
Are you at a 3rd grade or 5th grade reading level?Post in thread 'AP Top 25 poll' https://pittsburgh.forums.rivals.com/threads/ap-top-25-poll.236701/post-4603154