No, I do not. I think you are hypothesizing excuses for Pitt, though. In fact, I am sure you are doing that. Get a coach who can recruit and we can be a notch below the blue bloods, if he is also a good X&Os. Have a guy like Stallings who falls short in both areas and we will be one of the worst P5 programs in the country.You don't think ND has an advantage? You don't think Miami and FSU have an advantage? You don't think NC St under Gottfried had an advantage?
You don't understand why Western Kentucky out recruits us?
Virginia Tech is the coach. Providence maybe more going on there than meets the eye(admission wise).
Schools like Xavier, Butler and Creighton have been at the top of the food chain in their leagues, plus they have developed a certain niche that works to their advantage. That is something we need to do. Stallings has said as much.
"Providence maybe more going on there than meets the eye(admission wise)."
This is the lamest, laziest, and dumbest excuse there is. Pitt recruits some very, very dumb and barely eligible kids to play basketball and football. So does everyone else. If they are NCAA eligible and accept a Pitt scholarship, they are admitted.
They don't have a niche. Their place "at the top of the food chain" in lower level leagues don't mean much. What matters is their coaches/staffs. That is the "advantage" we need.
Basketball is much, much simpler than football.
Last edited: