another back named Larry Brown
Out of Pittsburgh's Schenley High School.
another back named Larry Brown
Yep, in that same Era Mercury Morris was from Pittsburgh Area and Chuck Muncie and Po James!Out of Pittsburgh's Schenley High School.
If I was to compare units, I would give advantage to the following:
QB - Pitt
RB - PSU (I don't think Connor will be 100% by then... he will be better in the 2nd half of the season)
TE - PUSH
WR - PSU
OL - Pitt
DL - Pitt
LB - PSU
DB - Push
I think it could be a tight game. I respect Matt Canada's play calling, but I think that Moorhead is the better OC. Narduzzi obviously gets the nod on the defensive side.
Now Conner was the one fighting cancer correct?
I wonder how "back" he is from that. It wouldn't shock me if a 100% guy would do that type of damage to the PSU D line....well provided you have a QB that can keep them honest. Not many guys can run with the LOS stacked.
We ate that D alive last year, in spite of their good D line. It took 13 penalty calls just to keep it half way respectable match. Harbaugh had Ruddock using the short passing game since that D line was tough to run on. Between their losses, on the line, and if Pitt can do something similar, it could make for a monster stat game. Conner should have a much easier time than we did.
Ah well....it is all speculation until they lace em up. PSU could be fitten to open a can of whup arse on their entire schedule. I doubt it, but anything can happen. The only way their new QB is going to be able to help is by showing he can hit the deep pass regularly.
Anything less, and teams will be stacked in the 10 to 15 yards range off scrimmage, and daring them to throw the long ball.
If I was to compare units, I would give advantage to the following:
QB - Pitt
RB - PSU (I don't think Connor will be 100% by then... he will be better in the 2nd half of the season)
TE - PUSH
WR - PSU
OL - Pitt
DL - Pitt
LB - PSU
DB - Push
I think it could be a tight game. I respect Matt Canada's play calling, but I think that Moorhead is the better OC. Narduzzi obviously gets the nod on the defensive side.
"we" ate that d alive....lol. and just what position do you play on the team ?? YOU didn't do a damn thing. You probably get winded just walking to the mailbox. Also, why are you constantly in the middle of pitt/penn state discussions. You know exactlly who Dan Conner is. Doesn't it bother you that Pitts head coach absolutely owned the mighty wolverines while he was a DC at msu?
Yeh Moorehead is better which is why he was a UConn and then Fordham while Canada was at Wisconsin and NC State.If I was to compare units, I would give advantage to the following:
QB - Pitt
RB - PSU (I don't think Connor will be 100% by then... he will be better in the 2nd half of the season)
TE - PUSH
WR - PSU
OL - Pitt
DL - Pitt
LB - PSU
DB - Push
I think it could be a tight game. I respect Matt Canada's play calling, but I think that Moorhead is the better OC. Narduzzi obviously gets the nod on the defensive side.
Hmmmnnnn, good point and Canada OC in D-I FBS Power Conferences unlike Moorhead?Yeh Moorehead is better which is why he was a UConn and then Fordham while Canada was at Wisconsin and NC State.
Yeh Moorehead is better which is why he was a UConn and then Fordham while Canada was at Wisconsin and NC State.
If I was to compare units, I would give advantage to the following:
QB - Pitt
RB - PSU (I don't think Connor will be 100% by then... he will be better in the 2nd half of the season)
TE - PUSH
WR - PSU
OL - Pitt
DL - Pitt
LB - PSU
DB - Push
I think it could be a tight game. I respect Matt Canada's play calling, but I think that Moorhead is the better OC. Narduzzi obviously gets the nod on the defensive side.
On PSU's side the HC is marginalized during gameday. It will be Moorhead and Pry whoHC - PITT
During the game, Moorhead and Pry will have more to do with PSU's success or failure than Franklin. He is taking a more CEO-like role this year.HC - PITT
To be fair, Moorhead was the OC of the only UConn team to make a BCS game and was a HC at Fordham. As I said, I respect Canada as a playcaller, I just like Moorhead more. I like his offense more and I think it is better suited for the college game. Although, Canada's offense is a good match for what PN wants.Yeh Moorehead is better which is why he was a UConn and then Fordham while Canada was at Wisconsin and NC State.
The new offense should help keep teams honest against PSU's running game. We are using wider splits and will spread the field on each down. Add in a hurry-up tempo and it would be hard for teams to stack 8 men in the box against Barkley, especially with the threats at WR. I think teams will have to play a lot of nickel against PSU and hope that their DL can cause enough disruption up front instead of relying on blitzes.Canada put 40+ on Clemson last year while Moorehead put 40+ on Army last year. Since he put more points up on Army than the nits did last year this makes him the better OC which is a crock.
I'll give it to these nits, they have guzzled, gushed and swallowed the Moorehead kool-aid to the point if they struggle against Kent State there will probably be a mass meltdown of epic proportion. A loss to Pitt would cause the McAndrew board to shut down.
Listen, I see why they are all giddy like a kid waiting on a quarter from the tooth fairy.
They have receivers and running backs and think PRESTO instant offense, however, they are installing a new offense with a new quarterback who's claim to fame is scoring 2 4th quarter td's against a Georgia team that was playing out the season with a skeleton coaching staff then putting a smack down on the second team defense in the spring game which looked more like a scout team than a second team big 10 defense.
Their offensive line is lacking and I expect defenses to crowd the line to stop Barkley while making the new qb beat them. I think the better defensive lines will give them all kind of fits and there will be growing pains for them whether they like it or not.
It would not surprise me at all to see the nits get pushed around for the most of the season. If the offense isn't sustaining drives the defense will never last the season.
Vegas has their win total at 6.5 for a reason. Even if Moorehead is the second coming.
Good points but can Franklin give up the Sidelines Coaching, he often looked like a Deer in Highlights last season and growling at his Assistants and why some left him. I don't think Franklin can make that CEO Transition as easy as it appears.On PSU's side the HC is marginalized during gameday. It will be Moorhead and Pry who
During the game, Moorhead and Pry will have more to do with PSU's success or failure than Franklin. He is taking a more CEO-like role this year.
From reading Moorhead's Book, his system is based upon the QB making the right call instantly as the play begins, his players adjusting to that call, and the OL holding those blocks on that call for at least 1.8 seconds? This is going to take time to getting use to even if the OL can hold their blocks?The new offense should help keep teams honest against PSU's running game. We are using wider splits and will spread the field on each down. Add in a hurry-up tempo and it would be hard for teams to stack 8 men in the box against Barkley, especially with the threats at WR. I think teams will have to play a lot of nickel against PSU and hope that their DL can cause enough disruption up front instead of relying on blitzes.
Honestly, I am not the least bit concerned about Sanders. He is a true freshman back. Barkley, is one of the top RB in the country, so of course there is reason to be worried.
People seem to be predicting a shoot out, but I think we will be pounding the ball hard and taking air out of the ball. This scares me a bit, cause it may cause us to get behind early. I think you can be sure there will be a few wrinkles on both sides, trickeration, penalties, hard-hitting... it will come down to turnovers, and I like Peterman not turning the ball over more than their rookie doing the same. Whitehead pick 6 ala Billy Owens to win it![]()
I think the 6.5 victory total for PSU this year is accurate. It could be 6 or 7 victories in a good year, if a lot of things break their way. I don't see one of those victories being against Pitt. They aren't good enough to beat a Pitt team that will contend for the ACC Coastal title. And PSU is probably the 5th most difficult opponent that Pitt will face this year, maybe lower. If we can't beat them handily, Narduzzi will need to reevaluate his gameplan. We should be able to handle them by at least the 9 point spread. But it's a "rivalry" game, so who knows what they'll pull to get a win. We all know what lowlifes PSU coaches are.
Certainly agree with some of this, however Pitt is currently only a 5.5 point favorite over PSU.
I checked out some stats from UConn's offense that year: 96th in Total Offense with 325yds per game, 63rd in Scoring Offense @ 26.4 pts per game and 110th in Passing Offense. Their best ranking was Rushing Offense which was #35.To be fair, Moorhead was the OC of the only UConn team to make a BCS game and was a HC at Fordham. As I said, I respect Canada as a playcaller, I just like Moorhead more. I like his offense more and I think it is better suited for the college game. Although, Canada's offense is a good match for what PN wants.
I think psu fans think his zone blocking scheme and up tempo is going to negate their biggest weakness.
In theory it very well might. Also just as probable that his offense creates a ton of 3 and outs leaving his defense on the field for far too much time
With you guys playing them in the 2nd game, if they are learning a new blocking style this yr, I suspect Nard will let the D line pin their ears back, and bull rush most plays. The PSU offensive line play should be entertaining for the first half of the year, minimum.
Lol, you realize Barkley ran for over 1000 yards in 6 1/2 games with one of the most abysmal O lines in the country, right?Funny. Pitt's RB's are as good or better than PSU's. James Conner will be back and he ran for 1,800 and 26 TD's as a Sophomore in 2014. Ollison had more yards than Barkley last year when both were true Freshmen.
Lol, you realize Barkley ran for over 1000 yards in 6 1/2 games with one of the most abysmal O lines in the country, right?
Conner is great but you guys are clueless when it comes to Barkley.
You realize James Conner was a first team All-American who had 26 TD's his Sophomore year? Barkley is good. Conner is just as good...or better. They have different styles.Lol, you realize Barkley ran for over 1000 yards in 6 1/2 games with one of the most abysmal O lines in the country, right?
What about him playing 6 1/2 games is false?You realize James Conner was a first team All-American who had 26 TD's his Sophomore year? Barkley is good. Conner is just as good...or better. They have different styles.
LOL Pitt's Ollison had more yards as a Freshman than Barkley did....and 6 1/2 games my a$$. BTW I would assume the OL is still tragic.