They are projected to get 6 and maybe 7 if 4 seed and host UNLV wins it.
These are the league's Q1/2 wins in the non-con
20 San Diego St
Q1 SMC (neutral), @ Gonzaga
Q2 Washington (neutral), 2 1 point wins vs UC Irvine and @ UC San Diego
24 Boise State
Q1 SMC (neutral)
Q2 VCU (neutral), San Francisco
29 New Mexico
Q1 none
Q2 UC Irvine
31 Nevada
Q1 @ Washington, TCU (neutral)
Q2 none
33 Utah State
Q1 none
Q2 UC Irvine, San Francisco (neutral even though it was in the Jazz arena), @ Santa Clara
36 Colorado State
Q1 Creighton (neutral), Colorado
Q2 Washington (neutral), Boston College (neutral)
Its just so odd that this league is projected to get 55% of their league in when all they really did in the non-con was beat Washington, San Francisco, SMC, and UC Irvine. I've been saying they are gaming the NET and this is further proof. Their NETs were so good in December that when January rolls around, every game is a Q1. I hope the committee isnt as stupid as I think they are
These are the league's Q1/2 wins in the non-con
20 San Diego St
Q1 SMC (neutral), @ Gonzaga
Q2 Washington (neutral), 2 1 point wins vs UC Irvine and @ UC San Diego
24 Boise State
Q1 SMC (neutral)
Q2 VCU (neutral), San Francisco
29 New Mexico
Q1 none
Q2 UC Irvine
31 Nevada
Q1 @ Washington, TCU (neutral)
Q2 none
33 Utah State
Q1 none
Q2 UC Irvine, San Francisco (neutral even though it was in the Jazz arena), @ Santa Clara
36 Colorado State
Q1 Creighton (neutral), Colorado
Q2 Washington (neutral), Boston College (neutral)
Its just so odd that this league is projected to get 55% of their league in when all they really did in the non-con was beat Washington, San Francisco, SMC, and UC Irvine. I've been saying they are gaming the NET and this is further proof. Their NETs were so good in December that when January rolls around, every game is a Q1. I hope the committee isnt as stupid as I think they are