I should have known with your infatuation of the NBA.
I'm really not sure what this is supposed to mean.
I should have known with your infatuation of the NBA.
By far the worst concert I ever saw was Jefferson Starship, no one even comes close, and this was when they were as big as they ever got to be. Haven't bought or listened to one of their songs that I had power over since.I think you are the only one.....to me the song is roughly on par with this one....
I saw Quiet Riot at Bar Louie in station square about 10 years ago. Wont call it a concert, more of a band playing on a bar in front of dozens of people.. I actually enjoyed myself.. You want a bad concert, go to a Journey show without Steven Perry.. It would be like going to a Huey Lewis and the news concert with out Huey, no one wants to see The NewsBy far the worst concert I ever saw was Jefferson Starship, no one even comes close, and this was when they were as big as they ever got to be. Haven't bought or listened to one of their songs that I had power over since.
It figures work on it for a while!I'm really not sure what this is supposed to mean.
I know, I couldn't think of a good example.. How bout the E street Band without Bruce..... I'm pretty sure people aren't beating down the door to see Huey either. However, I do love that Huey Lewis and the News keep making their way into a thread about the greatest rock bands of all time. That's incredibly awesome!
It figures work on it for a while!
Oh come on Beiber is more like today's Shawn Cassidy..or Donny Osmond and the Stones are every bit as much of pop culture or were as the Beatles or the Beach Boys....they just try to play the badass card by writing songs about the Devil like Zeps associations or Sabbath or BOC.... None of whom were satanists but it built a mystique....even the Beatles had Alister Crowley on the Sgt Pepper coverYes......because MOST of pop culture is lowest common denominator crapola. The Beatles were essentially 4 Biebers.
Well, you can be a great artist without necessarily being a great businessman. History is littered with those. I don't really hold that against the guy.
I am just intrigued by the most important part in Ski's claim. That's really an extra level of accolade and I'm interested to hear why? I hope it's not just empty millennial hyperbole because Kanye really does intrigue me.
However, I go back-and-forth on the guy from afar. Sometimes I think he may be the real thing and worth investing my time in. Other times I fear he may be just a really good imposter and kind of the musical equivalent of Andy Warhol, who basically became famous by repainting labels and photos and by hanging out with celebrities.
I won't deny that my enjoyment of Kanye's music certain factors into this discussion. But at the same time - I can recognize that the Beatles were tremendously important without liking their catalogue.
When it comes to my statements about Kanye, it's the fact that as a rapper and a producer, he's changed hip hop. Artists like Drake and Kid Cudi wouldn't be around were it not for Kanye. Kanye made it cool to embrace emotions, and he brought that style of rapping about feelings and girls and insecurity back into mainstream rap. Both College Dropout and 808s and Heartbreaks especially are vulnerable and emotional albums, where he's singing about death and heartbreak and moved away from hyper masculine rap albums. Its because of this shift that artists like Drake and Kid Cudi have been able to build their popularity.
As a producer, Kanye brought back the use of soul music as a sample, which has had a huge impact on music. He also, you know, revitalized Jay-Zs career. His use of autotune, especially on 808s has been absolutely huge and it moved autotune into the realm of legitimacy. Whether you like it or not, Kanye used it purposefully and its impacted music.
If you want to broaden the scope, whether you like him or not, Kanye's had a huge impact on culture. His attitude, his political statements, his fashion, it's all changed the game.
I like Cudi a lot. Rather be deaf than have to listen to a Drake album.
That depends on music taste. What is "fun" anyways? I think most "fun" groups are insipid, saccharine like crap.
Like for instance I think "The Who" is FUN, and they had real talent, and it wasn't "saccharine" at all, and it wasn't always sounding like you are just leaving a funeral or getting chased out of a haunted house, like Led Zep often seemed, some of their sound was actually uplifting and inspiring and not crap at all.
Caught them a couple times....at the Civic Arena with the Tower of Power horns. Really a good show....just played their stuff....no lasers smoke or mirrors. Light, but enjoyable. I don't need to feel challenged by music.... I'm pretty sure people aren't beating down the door to see Huey either. However, I do love that Huey Lewis and the News keep making their way into a thread about the greatest rock bands of all time. That's incredibly awesome!
Of course it is, all music is subjective. I know some people who I went to high school with in the late '70s, ask them their favorite music from back in the day and they start naming disco music groups.Isn't that all subjective though?
I am,Then you aren't listening closely enough..
... I'm pretty sure people aren't beating down the door to see Huey either. However, I do love that Huey Lewis and the News keep making their way into a thread about the greatest rock bands of all time. That's incredibly awesome!
Caught them a couple times....at the Civic Arena with the Tower of Power horns. Really a good show....just played their stuff....no lasers smoke or mirrors. Light, but enjoyable. I don't need to feel challenged by music.
I'm sure you prefer grunge shiznit. Filthy people mumbling about their toenail fungus while the cacophony behind them drones on. ICP??All I needed to know that you found this crap to be "really enjoyable". Stay out of the threads where the cool kids participate please.
I won't deny that my enjoyment of Kanye's music certain factors into this discussion. But at the same time - I can recognize that the Beatles were tremendously important without liking their catalogue.
When it comes to my statements about Kanye, it's the fact that as a rapper and a producer, he's changed hip hop. Artists like Drake and Kid Cudi wouldn't be around were it not for Kanye. Kanye made it cool to embrace emotions, and he brought that style of rapping about feelings and girls and insecurity back into mainstream rap. Both College Dropout and 808s and Heartbreaks especially are vulnerable and emotional albums, where he's singing about death and heartbreak and moved away from hyper masculine rap albums. Its because of this shift that artists like Drake and Kid Cudi have been able to build their popularity.
As a producer, Kanye brought back the use of soul music as a sample, which has had a huge impact on music. He also, you know, revitalized Jay-Zs career. His use of autotune, especially on 808s has been absolutely huge and it moved autotune into the realm of legitimacy. Whether you like it or not, Kanye used it purposefully and its impacted music.
If you want to broaden the scope, whether you like him or not, Kanye's had a huge impact on culture. His attitude, his political statements, his fashion, it's all changed the game.
After reading the first page, it has been discovered that many people here have ZERO CLUE AS TO WHAT GOOD MUSIC IS!
Steve Miller band - PURE AWESOME
KISS, AC/DC, Areosmith, Van Halen - Kick ass music!
I couldn't even read beyond the first page as I am just saying WTF on this!
You want some over-rated crap music?
ANYONE that uses auto-tune
Kurt Kobain's greatest song? Click-Click,Bang.Splatter
Any whiny grunge sound feel sorry for me bullcrap
9 inch nails, Nirvana,Pearl Jam, Red Hot Chili peppers, RadioHead,Foo Fighters, Alice in Chains
After reading the first page, it has been discovered that many people here have ZERO CLUE AS TO WHAT GOOD MUSIC IS!
Steve Miller band - PURE AWESOME
KISS, AC/DC, Areosmith, Van Halen - Kick ass music!
I couldn't even read beyond the first page as I am just saying WTF on this!
You want some over-rated crap music?
ANYONE that uses auto-tune
Kurt Kobain's greatest song? Click-Click,Bang.Splatter
Any whiny grunge sound feel sorry for me bullcrap
9 inch nails, Nirvana,Pearl Jam, Red Hot Chili peppers, RadioHead,Foo Fighters, Alice in Chains
Oh come on Beiber is more like today's Shawn Cassidy..or Donny Osmond and the Stones are every bit as much of pop culture or were as the Beatles or the Beach Boys....they just try to play the badass card by writing songs about the Devil like Zeps associations or Sabbath or BOC.... None of whom were satanists but it built a mystique....even the Beatles had Alister Crowley on the Sgt Pepper cover![]()
Well, the Stones overcame their upbringing...the Beatles just appealed to teen chicks. Shallow, vapid, boring. Did anybody ever dance to the Beatles dreck??Lemmy had an interesting take on the Beatles and the Stones (he had actually seen the Beatles at the Cavern Club in Liverpool). Anyhow, his point was that the Beatles always had the clean-cut nice-boy image, while the Stones were the bad boys. In reality, it was the other way around. The Beatles were the working class kids from Liverpool, while the Stones were art-school kids from London.
Let me first acknowledge that neither the Beatles nor the Stones are my personal favorite rock bands. However, I think it is patently absurd for people to try to deny the greatness of either band. In my mind they are CLEARLY two of the most influential bands of all time and arguably THE two most influential bands to ever come down the track.
The Beatles in particular were just astoundingly prolific for a band that was only around for EIGHT YEARS. Think of their musical catalogue and all the songs we all know by heart and it is incredible to think that they all come from what amounts to a handful of albums.
That is unprecedented and never replicated either.
Also, to start off as basically the One Direction of their day and to evolve into the preeminent psychedelic rock band of what is unquestionably an era defined by such music is just an incredible display of both guts and talent. Let me put it this way: nobody else has ever come close to doing anything like it before or since.
Think about how easy it would have been for them to put out catchy little ditties for 10 years and then just count their money – just like so many of their contemporaries did.
To start off with catchy little ditties like “I Want To Hold Your Hand” and “Eight Days A Week” and to, in a very short period of time, end up producing classic epics like “I Am The Walrus” and “A Day In The Life” is just incredible and has my full respect; especially when juxtaposed against the rest of the bands who were also producing music in that era – many of whom were great in their own right, just not that great.
I think the most overrated artist of that era and maybe all-time is Elvis Pressley. I just have never heard anything special from him. Maybe it was one of those deals where you had to be there in that time to fully appreciate him? I came along a bit later and looking at it in retrospect, he is HIGHLY overrated, IMHO. Another grossly overrated band of that era was the Beach Boys. Basically, they are sort of like Rage Against the Machine in the sense that if you’ve heard one of their songs you have heard them all…at least up until Brian Wilson lost his marbles while trying to keep up with the Beatles.
Let me first acknowledge that neither the Beatles nor the Stones are my personal favorite rock bands. However, I think it is patently absurd for people to try to deny the greatness of either band. In my mind they are CLEARLY two of the most influential bands of all time and arguably THE two most influential bands to ever come down the track.
The Beatles in particular were just astoundingly prolific for a band that was only around for EIGHT YEARS. Think of their musical catalogue and all the songs we all know by heart and it is incredible to think that they all come from what amounts to a handful of albums.
That is unprecedented and never replicated either.
Also, to start off as basically the One Direction of their day and to evolve into the preeminent psychedelic rock band of what is unquestionably an era defined by such music is just an incredible display of both guts and talent. Let me put it this way: nobody else has ever come close to doing anything like it before or since.
Think about how easy it would have been for them to put out catchy little ditties for 10 years and then just count their money – just like so many of their contemporaries did.
To start off with catchy little ditties like “I Want To Hold Your Hand” and “Eight Days A Week” and to, in a very short period of time, end up producing classic epics like “I Am The Walrus” and “A Day In The Life” is just incredible and has my full respect; especially when juxtaposed against the rest of the bands who were also producing music in that era – many of whom were great in their own right, just not that great.
I think the most overrated artist of that era and maybe all-time is Elvis Pressley. I just have never heard anything special from him. Maybe it was one of those deals where you had to be there in that time to fully appreciate him? I came along a bit later and looking at it in retrospect, he is HIGHLY overrated, IMHO. Another grossly overrated band of that era was the Beach Boys. Basically, they are sort of like Rage Against the Machine in the sense that if you’ve heard one of their songs you have heard them all…at least up until Brian Wilson lost his marbles while trying to keep up with the Beatles.
Bravo. Well said. Again, music is personal as far as tastes, I am not the biggest Beatles fan but to deny their impact and saying they "sucked" is like saying I hate the Patriots and they "suck".
And spot on with dreck like SMB, Aerosmith and Van Halen. They aren't the worst, they could be hair bands, but they aren't far behind.
Pearl Jam hasn't played grunge in 20 years.. RHCP are great.. you are stuck in the DVE mentality, my friend..... Music exists beyond 1981....
I can acknowledge their influence while still thinking their music is garbage.
I've tried to forget their junk. Glad they broke up.Let me first acknowledge that neither the Beatles nor the Stones are my personal favorite rock bands. However, I think it is patently absurd for people to try to deny the greatness of either band. In my mind they are CLEARLY two of the most influential bands of all time and arguably THE two most influential bands to ever come down the track.
The Beatles in particular were just astoundingly prolific for a band that was only around for EIGHT YEARS. Think of their musical catalogue and all the songs we all know by heart and it is incredible to think that they all come from what amounts to a handful of albums.
That is unprecedented and never replicated either.
Also, to start off as basically the One Direction of their day and to evolve into the preeminent psychedelic rock band of what is unquestionably an era defined by such music is just an incredible display of both guts and talent. Let me put it this way: nobody else has ever come close to doing anything like it before or since.
Think about how easy it would have been for them to put out catchy little ditties for 10 years and then just count their money – just like so many of their contemporaries did.
To start off with catchy little ditties like “I Want To Hold Your Hand” and “Eight Days A Week” and to, in a very short period of time, end up producing classic epics like “I Am The Walrus” and “A Day In The Life” is just incredible and has my full respect; especially when juxtaposed against the rest of the bands who were also producing music in that era – many of whom were great in their own right, just not that great.
I think the most overrated artist of that era and maybe all-time is Elvis Pressley. I just have never heard anything special from him. Maybe it was one of those deals where you had to be there in that time to fully appreciate him? I came along a bit later and looking at it in retrospect, he is HIGHLY overrated, IMHO. Another grossly overrated band of that era was the Beach Boys. Basically, they are sort of like Rage Against the Machine in the sense that if you’ve heard one of their songs you have heard them all…at least up until Brian Wilson lost his marbles while trying to keep up with the Beatles.
Kanye West is the most important artist of this century?
Wow! That is an extremely strong and bold claim –especially for a century that's not yet 20 years-old.
However, I am open-minded. So tell me, what makes Kanye West's work not just better but also more important than everyone else's work?
I guess what I'm saying is I'm very intrigued by your claim and I'm excited to learn more about the guy. Maybe there's a treasure trove that I need to learn about?
Or does that statement simply mean that he's your favorite artist of the past 15 years?