Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dankePG: McGowens, Johnson
SG/Wing: Ellison, Davis, N'Dir, JWF, Stevenson (undersized 4)
Big: Brown, Kene, Peace, George
Two spots left. Coaches may just hold one or both for 2019 if they can't get another grad transfer.
PG: McGowens, Johnson
SG/Wing: Ellison, Davis, N'Dir, JWF, Stevenson (undersized 4)
Big: Brown, Kene, Peace, George
Two spots left. Coaches may just hold one or both for 2019 if they can't get another grad transfer.
I believe this is how it goes--someone please correct if in error.
Here is last year's roster sorted by position--
http://pittsburghpanthers.com/roster.aspx?path=mbball&roster=186&sort=position
Subtractions (5 Ships Opened)--
P. Stewart (transfer out) SG
J. Milligan (graduated) PG
R. Luther (transfer out) PF
M. Carr (transfer out) CG
M. Boykins (graduated) SG
Z. Smith (walk-on graduated) SG
Additions (3 Ships Filled)--
S. N'Dir (grad transfer) PG [6-2, 190]
X. Johnson (Fr) PG/CG [6-1, 175]
T. McGowens (Fr) SG/CG [6-4, 175]
That leaves 3 Ships Open for 2019 Class (Since N'Dir as grad transfer will only play 1 year).
Forgot Ellison.I believe this is how it goes--someone please correct if in error.
Here is last year's roster sorted by position--
http://pittsburghpanthers.com/roster.aspx?path=mbball&roster=186&sort=position
Subtractions (5 Ships Opened)--
P. Stewart (transfer out) SG
J. Milligan (graduated) PG
R. Luther (transfer out) PF
M. Carr (transfer out) CG
M. Boykins (graduated) SG
Z. Smith (walk-on graduated) SG
Additions (3 Ships Filled)--
S. N'Dir (grad transfer) PG [6-2, 190]
X. Johnson (Fr) PG/CG [6-1, 175]
T. McGowens (Fr) SG/CG [6-4, 175]
That leaves 3 Ships Open for 2019 Class (Since N'Dir as grad transfer will only play 1 year).
Just wondering out loud , but you have to wonder how the play of Chewie and Pitts other inside players last season were effected by KS system . Were they really that bad of rebounders or was the scheme making them look that bad ? I also doubt you’ll see Chewie chucking up all those threes this coming season too .Kene is back. Currently there are two open spots and two seniors (JWF and N'Dir). Plus there are still some guys who could be asked to move on after this year.
Capel can still have a large 2019 class.
If we are actually keeping Kene and George I'd like to see us bring in 1 grad transfer big and 1 FR big. Next year you push out Kene and George and then have 3 SRs leaving. Plus, you could have Davis and Ellison looking to leave or get pushed out. Gives you easy access to at least 5 scholarships for 2019 and possibly as many as 7.
We currently have 11 players.
2 seniors
2 juniors
5 sophomores
2 freshmen
If this holds, I would expect Capel to bring in 6 next year coming from the current unfilled 2 scholarships, JWF, N'dir, and 2 more players who will either transfer (Ellison), or won't be asked back (Chukwuka, George, Peace, etc).
We currently have 11 players.
2 seniors
2 juniors
5 sophomores
2 freshmen
If this holds, I would expect Capel to bring in 6 next year coming from the current unfilled 2 scholarships, JWF, N'dir, and 2 more players who will either transfer (Ellison), or won't be asked back (Chukwuka, George, Peace, etc).
This sounds about right to me but I think as long as you have a minimum class of 4 legit kids next season that is a really good start.
Hard to get a class of 6 really good kids.
So anything from 4 to 6 is good in my book.
Forgot Ellison.[/QUOTE
Ellison is on the roster I linked from the Pitt official site.
I did forget to add Curtis Aiken, Jr. , our preferred walk-on.
'Just wondering out loud , but you have to wonder how the play of Chewie and Pitts other inside players last season were effected by KS system . Were they really that bad of rebounders or was the scheme making them look that bad ? I also doubt you’ll see Chewie chucking up all those threes this coming season too .
Don’t worry there will be plenty of space for the serious upgrades Pitts new recruiting guru will bring in !
That is too much charity with no payoff IMO. Especially all at similar/same positions.You make some very good points. So far Capel has "pushed" nobody out. My guess
is he wanted to show positive feelings to the existing players and look like a "good guy"
with his initial dealings with the program. The fact that he's keeping Kene, Iggy, and
George despite their limitations says a lot about him. It will be interesting to see how he
handles this after one year here. If he brings in a few Bigs one or two now, and a few next year, he could actually keep Kene, Iggy and George.They would have the seldom used 11th, 12th and 13th spots.
I would expect at least 4 (probably 5) FR and then 1-3 grad transfers or transfers next year. I think ideally you have 6 scholarships to work with and you take 4 FR, 1 grad, and 1 is flexible based on whether you can get a really high level transfer or FR.This sounds about right to me but I think as long as you have a minimum class of 4 legit kids next season that is a really good start.
Hard to get a class of 6 really good kids.
So anything from 4 to 6 is good in my book.
That is too much charity with no payoff IMO. Especially all at similar/same positions.
I would expect at least 4 (probably 5) FR and then 1-3 grad transfers or transfers next year. I think ideally you have 6 scholarships to work with and you take 4 FR, 1 grad, and 1 is flexible based on whether you can get a really high level transfer or FR.
Well, normally those spots on the roster are guys who you hope could develop into something and eventually contribute. For all 3 to essentially be the same position AND have no chance of being quality ACC players, that is a lot of charity with no chance of cashing in.What "payoff" does any team get from the 11th,12th, and 13th slots. A normal rotation
is usually about 9 players. By the way, I'm no fan of Kene, Iggy, or George. My preference
would be to counsel them out of the program. If they insisted, on staying, and I doubt all
three would do that, Capel would have to make a decision on each.
I realize some coaches get rid of marginal players every year. With all that said, I'd rather
they be gone sooner than later. I also have to admit I have no idea what kind of character
these guys have. My sense is they're pretty good guys. It'll be interesting to see how
Capel handles this.
Well, normally those spots on the roster are guys who you hope could develop into something and eventually contribute. For all 3 to essentially be the same position AND have no chance of being quality ACC players, that is a lot of charity with no chance of cashing in.
Yeah, I think most of the time those guys are getting recruited over, but you at least hope they hit sometimes. I don't think any of those guys have a prayer of being players and it all being the same position makes even more unlikely.Ok, I'll agree with the "all three same position" statement and I certainly agree that
they "have no chance of being quality ACC players." What I usually see is
11th, 12th, and 13th getting recruited over as opposed to eventually contributing.
Their usual contribution is being practice fpodder. Anyway, I'm just looking at it from
a different viewpoint. We're probably more in agreement on this then our posts. LOL
Yeah, I think most of the time those guys are getting recruited over, but you at least hope they hit sometimes. I don't think any of those guys have a prayer of being players and it all being the same position makes even more unlikely.
I definitely think we agree we hope to see better, even if they are the 11, 12, and 13 spots on the team, in the future.
I think it was the system. I thought chewie was absolutely terrible last season, but occasionally showed he could rebound. I'm not thrilled to have him back, but a little intrigued to see him under a new coach. If capel doesn't let him chuck up awful shots at free will and he spends the offseason working on his post game, he may end up being a serviceable bench 4.Just wondering out loud , but you have to wonder how the play of Chewie and Pitts other inside players last season were effected by KS system . Were they really that bad of rebounders or was the scheme making them look that bad ? I also doubt you’ll see Chewie chucking up all those threes this coming season too .
Don’t worry there will be plenty of space for the serious upgrades Pitts new recruiting guru will bring in !
Until you watch him try to play basketball.Being 6'9" with a 7'4" wingspan is a good start for developmental player.
Until you watch him try to play basketball.Being 6'9" with a 7'4" wingspan is a good start for developmental player.
Hope he can play?Being 6'9" with a 7'4" wingspan is a good start for developmental player.
Nothing has come directly from Kene. I have heard he’s returning but I would feel better if he posted something. Everything is speculation until he announces. Never expected him to be the last player to announce.Kene is back. Currently there are two open spots and two seniors (JWF and N'Dir). Plus there are still some guys who could be asked to move on after this year.
Capel can still have a large 2019 class.
At this moment how many Pitt fans really care one way or another whether he is back in terms of possibly helping the team be improved over last season?
To judge by various discussions on this board he appears to be seen as an end of bench player occupying a ship that it is hoped will eventually go to a more talented big man.
That's basically where I'm at. Ok if he stays, but don't really care if he leaves.
Stevenson won't be playing any 2G.The currently most likely players to get the most game minutes I would GUESS appear to be--
N'Dir (PG) and Elllison (2G/SF) should get starters PT.
Likewise, since we need at least one big man, Brown (C/PF) should get starters PT.
Then, at least based on last season--Frame (2G/F) will get good PT. Also, Stevenson (2G/SF) and Davis (2G) could get decent PT.
Finally, If they are as talented as believed, McGowens (2G/PG) and Johnson (PG) could/should eventually take away minutes from Stevenson and Davis as the season progresses with Johnson being N'Dir primary backup at the point and McGowens getting 2G minutes behind Frame and Ellison since the latter two should see significant minutes as wings (hybrid SFs/2Gs) if the "4-Guard" system is used as Pitt's primary offense.
Just guesswork--thoughts welcome.
Stevenson won't be playing any 2G.
I think both McGowens and Johnson will get a lot of PT and maybe McGowens even starts.
I could see a starting rotation of something along the lines of
McGowens/N'Dir at the 1 and 2.
Ellison at 3
Stevenson at the 4. Undersized for sure but really lack another big after Brown.
Brown at the 5.
Frame could potentially start as well in place of Stevenson where they go with a 4 guard type system.