Seriously?
uh threatening to kill one of the players is a fireable offense for sure, at the very least that kid's family should have had a "talk" with Stallings
Seriously?
A bad coach? Not at all. Its not like he's Ron Jirsa or Richard Pitino. He is to Vandy what Jamie was to Pitt at tougher place to win. He's been to 2 Sweet 16s at Vandy and has an SEC tourney championship. 7 NCAA appearances and Vandy has only been to 14 in their entire history. He also put Illinois State on the map. He's not THAT bad.
He really is and he has been awful the past 4 years. Dixon is light-years better than him. Stallings has absolutely no upside. The Pete would be empty every game.
.493 conference record in the SEC that usually only has one good team.
Who cares who he plays? That is AD driven in large part and will be with any coach hired after Dixon. He is an old man with a poor track record and a bad personality. He had absolutely no upside. It would be a debilitating hire. He can't coach and he hasn't shown to be a good recruiter.The last 4 years have been awful. No argument there.
Dixon isn't light years better. One huge improvement over Dixon is that Stallings actually plays teams in the OOC schedule. Just this past year Vandy played Kansas, Baylor, Dayton, Purdue and Texas. That's been a fairly routine thing under KS at Vandy.
It's hard to say what his upside is at a school like Pitt. I think it would be a totally unknown that would all come back to recruiting.
Are they trying to convince us that SEC basketball is tougher than ACC basketball?People got on Dixon for subpar results the last five years, so the idea of replacing him with someone with worse results is very disappointing.
Dixon 112-63; 4 20+ win seasons; 1 win in 3 NCAA tournament appearances
Stallings 96-72; 2 20+ win seasons; 1 conference tournament title; 1 win in 2 NCAA appearances
If Kevin Stallings was even considered (and it sounds like he seriously has been) I have no faith in Barnes as an AD. None.Maybe this is Scotty "Big Splash" Barnes' way of lowering the bar, so when he hires some nobody that he says has great potential, everyone will just say "at least he's better than Stallings".
Who cares who he plays? That is AD driven in large part and will be with any coach hired after Dixon. He is an old man with a poor track record and a bad personality. He had absolutely no upside. It would be a debilitating hire. He can't coach and he hasn't shown to be a good recruiter.
His track record is bad, though. No, they have say in it and so does the AD. Winning is really all that matters and he can't do that. Would I like better OOC games? Absolutely. Would I much rather win when it matters? Absolutely.
If Kevin Stallings is the hire, I hope his plane crashes into the car Barnes is waiting in to welcome him to Pittsburgh.
Head coaches drive the OOC schedule for the most part. His track record isn't bad. Its hard to say what his upside would be. His teams are much more fun to watch offensively. I don't think that is debatable. He's a good coach and he recruits okay at a VERY difficult place to recruit.
Almost any name mentioned would be clearly better because there would be some upside involved. With Stallings there is absolutely none. He is old and can't coach or recruit and his current school is packing his bags and fixing cupcakes for anyone who will take him off their handsI don't think you can call anybody's track record 'bad' that holds down a job for 17 years in a power conference. It's not what I would like either, but its fairly apparent that its as good as hire we are going to make.
OOC schedule is mostly the coach. The AD just rubber stamps it for the most part.
Old? The old guys that have been around the block a few times seem to be doing better than many of the so called up and comers lately. This isn't football.
And I totally disagree that there is no upside. I think its a big unknown.
uh threatening to kill one of the players is a fireable offense for sure, at the very least that kid's family should have had a "talk" with Stallings
You mean the guys who have proven to be too coaches for years and years? Stallings has proven to not be good for years and years. Complete opposite.Old? The old guys that have been around the block a few times seem to be doing better than many of the so called up and comers lately. This isn't football.
And I totally disagree that there is no upside. I think its a big unknown.
You mean the guys who have proven to be too coaches for years and years? Stallings has proven to not be good for years and years. Complete opposite.
What did Jim Larranaga prove his first 21 years as a head coach?
What did Jim Larranaga prove his first 21 years as a head coach?
I didn't ask what people thought of Miami's hire. I asked what Jim Larranaga did his first 21 years of coaching.
Larranaga has only made the tourney twice in 5 years at Miami.
Larranaga has only made the tourney twice in 5 years at Miami.
Are you related to Stallings?
Come to think of it, I don't even this his relatives could defend this hire.
Hey, anytime you can hire the coach that Vandy would literally pay millions to not coach their team, you gotta do it
So you took that as a serious threat? Did you think Jim McElwain should have been canned too?
He is a complete jerk and has proven it many times over believe me.I think he has a good personality. Why do you think he's an ass clown?
He is a complete jerk and has proven it many times over believe me.
Perhaps Barnes "liked" your endless negative posts??THIS IS AWFUL. THIS IS WHO WE GET AFTER DIXON LEAVES??
HELL, I'D RATHER HAVE JAMIE.
THIS STINKS
And Barnes was the reason he wanted out. Bring back Pederson!!!You can't hold a coach hostage who doesn't want to be here.
We had no way to "keep" Dixon.
Or the Manson Family.this has to be a member of Kevin Stallings family .
Why not just keep Dixon if you are going to hire Stallings? You had the buyout to prevent him from leaving.
His teams are much more fun to watch offensively. I don't think that is debatable.