You do realize that Narduzzi won the ACC and Wanny couldn't beat Uconn.
My point is Wanny D-line vs Pat's O-line favors Wanny way way more than Pat's D-line vs Wanny's O-line.I love the hypothetical era talk between teams.
Of some of the hypothetical matchups, it's my opinion that:
Romeus and Sheard were better then any Duzz DE's. If Romeus doesn't hurt his back, he would've had a similar NFL career as Sheard did.
Wanny landed Donald, and had a lot of really good DT's, but I think Duzz's DT's as a whole have been better but it might be a push.
Even if we give Pat the nod for having a better d-line, Wanny's o-line would have a solid performance against Pat's d-line because he had good o-lineman. Pat had a good o-lineman here and there, but most were soild at best. Wanny's d-line would go through Pat's o-line with way less resistance than vice a versa.