Walk off.I meant Narduzzi... nobody around likes him. He was and maybe still is on the hot seat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Walk off.I meant Narduzzi... nobody around likes him. He was and maybe still is on the hot seat
It is very perplexing that he can't get a few plays at his natural position. What makes it more troubling is the fact that the Duzz was blowing smoke last year about how great a player and leader he would be and would inspire the entire team to play better. What has changed? He went from prize recruit to a guy that Duzz could give a damn if he stays here or transfers out.Briggs is local, and I'm sure he's a solid kid.
I'm basing my statement solely on his play on Saturdays. He may light it up in practice, he may say "Yes sir", "No sir" any time Nardawg asks him a question. He probably goes to class and is well liked.
But I've seen him wiff on too many tackles and blow too many coverages, or just get flat out beat to understand how Ford can't get a single minute of playing time at his natural position because Briggs is blowing him away.
It's impossible to defend the 7 yard slant when you're 12 yards off it is true.Tough to defend a 7 yard slant when you are 12 yards off the slot wr. Hate the alignment narduzzi uses with the safeties.
But yeah, he missed a tackle in 2nd and was poor on run support all game. Campbell looked bad too and Briggs, well he played like Briggs.
Maybe Duzz was trying to make a 19 year old kid feel good about himself.It is very perplexing that he can't get a few plays at his natural position. What makes it more troubling is the fact that the Duzz was blowing smoke last year about how great a player and leader he would be and would inspire the entire team to play better. What has changed? He went from prize recruit to a guy that Duzz could give a damn if he stays here or transfers out.
There is simply no athletic comparison between he and Briggs. I saw both these kids play numerous times in their high school careers. Believe me when I tell you, I only thought one of them would be playing college ball at the highest level and it wasn't Dennis Briggs. But, hey what do I know. Our defense is pretty awful on a regular basis, why would we want to give a star local recruit a chance to change that? Let's bury him on the bench so he transfers while all the local kids of the future see what is going on.
Duke qb was in shotgun and getting rid of it in 2 seconds. Watch the highlights, snap look throw. These spread offenses are set up like this. You aren’t going to get too much pressure on the qb unless you jump a route. You could be Hugh green and you still aren’t getting there in time.It's impossible to defend the 7 yard slant when you're 12 yards off it is true.
But it's possible to stop the 7 yard slant from turning into a 30 yard (or more) gain when you are 12 yards off.
Pass coverage is like iron play in golf. Ben Hogan said he became a much better putter when he started hitting his iron shots better.
Without pressure on the QB it's impossible to defend the pass.
I don't think our dbs are poor in coverage (I think they tackle poorly). I believe our lack of pressure on the QB is the culprit on defense.
But he sucks. Great that he can lead and motivate, but when it comes to playing football, he doesn't belong on a P5 field.One of the media guys on TV said Briggs pulled the team together after the news of the Shooting in Squirrel Hill broke and rallied the team together. Maybe he is more of a team leader behind the scenes and that is something we don’t see as opposed to the term “teacher’s pet”.
So we can't play off coverage now... If we struggle with shadow press and off man, what coverage should Duzz look too?
Zone?
Actually it makes more sense.Duke qb was in shotgun and getting rid of it in 2 seconds. Watch the highlights, snap look throw. These spread offenses are set up like this. You aren’t going to get too much pressure on the qb unless you jump a route. You could be Hugh green and you still aren’t getting there in time.
These 12 yard cushions don’t make sense when you play a spread offense that is throwing it in 2 seconds.
Briggs is local, and I'm sure he's a solid kid.
I'm basing my statement solely on his play on Saturdays. He may light it up in practice, he may say "Yes sir", "No sir" any time Nardawg asks him a question. He probably goes to class and is well liked.
But I've seen him wiff on too many tackles and blow too many coverages, or just get flat out beat to understand how Ford can't get a single minute of playing time at his natural position because Briggs is blowing him away.
Who knows? We just know he isn't playing so its all guesses as to why.Briggs drives me crazy as well. Nice Kid as most of the Pitt kids seem to be but from a football perspective I wont miss seeing him, Zeise, and Hendricks on the field.
Having said that, if Ford was able to contribute especially given how bad the defense is, why wouldnt Duzz give him more PT over Briggs? After all, doesnt he have the most on the line (his job)? Not sure theres any coach who would sit someone on the bench who can help him win, unless his behavior problems are so bad that hes a cancer in which case the kid would be dismissed from the team.
Let's face it Fords HS career was based on dominating AA HS kids......The leap from HS to D1 FB is huge. It appears Ford has taken the approach that his natural talent is enough to justify starting and has not applied himself in workouts and the classroom to justify getting more PT.
I've seen him play several times this season, never stood out as more impressive than any of the other db's
Exactly. He has done nothing when he has played. He got more chances earlier in the year and did nothing to warrant more PT. I have said for those asking to get Ford more PT, why are you not saying that about a kid like Coleman??? Coleman has played less than Ford and made more plays. That’s a fact.
Why don’t ppl start threads about Coleman getting more PT? He’s a local kid. Oh because he’s was lower star ranked smh.
And yes lots of highly ranked players turn out good. But many peak in HS.
Last for those who think we won’t get good players if we don’t play Ford...then I guess you think we should bench our best RB Ollison. For he was our lowest ranked RB. According to that logic we should bench him and play the highly ranked Davis who has done nothing in 2 years.
The point of confusion is Ford is a prototypical safety. Those others mentioned above are CB's. With the lousy to mediocre/inconsistent play at safety, it is just puzzling why Ford not even gets ANY snaps at S, even against Albany, but isn't even being practiced at safety, but at corner where there is much more quality depth as you pointed out.
He may be a stiff, who knows, but it is a very odd situation for a kid who had lots of quality offers and played in the under armor game.
I continually call for any or all alternatives to be tried, 0 star or 5 star or anyone on between. Perhaps it's totally on the scheme and nobody could possibly exceed the meager accomplishments of Briggs. But until the D is not a total sieve, forgive the audacity to think somebody else might possibly warrant a shot.Exactly. He has done nothing when he has played. He got more chances earlier in the year and did nothing to warrant more PT. I have said for those asking to get Ford more PT, why are you not saying that about a kid like Coleman??? Coleman has played less than Ford and made more plays. That’s a fact.
Why don’t ppl start threads about Coleman getting more PT? He’s a local kid. Oh because he’s was lower star ranked smh.
And yes lots of highly ranked players turn out good. But many peak in HS.
Last for those who think we won’t get good players if we don’t play Ford...then I guess you think we should bench our best RB Ollison. For he was our lowest ranked RB. According to that logic we should bench him and play the highly ranked Davis who has done nothing in 2 years.
This always boogles my mind.Duzz said there are a lot more responsibilities at safety and indicated that learning the QB position were theres a lot less to worry about would help him better understand the safety position. Reading into it.........Ford has not studied the play book and doesnt clearly know his assignments at safety. Again theres not a coach in the country who would NOT play a kid if he thought the kid improved his chances of WINNING!. Clearly this staff thinks that the guys they are using (Hamlin, Stocker, Campbell and Briggs) give them a better chance to win than Ford. Id also submit that the vast majority of coaches will not play a kid who doesnt know the position and is out of position too often but has more athletic ability.
Its really not that hard to understand.
The whole "too dumb to be effective" thing is tired. You cited WVU in particular. They got great service at a complicated (relatively speaking; it's freaking football) position from Pat White, a man so hopelessly challenged mentally that he communicated in grunts and yelps most of the time. Even Rushel Shell, stupid AND lazy AND stoned out of his gourd every moment ... yet WVU got solid, if unspectacular results (after we failed miserably to find a way). You could name countless others. Including some past Pitt stars too. You ultimately likely can't hack it with a whole team of drooling 'tards, usually at least some of the hogs are mentally competent ... I gotta figure there likely was a literate center who kept Pat White in the same zip code during his time...but a really clever and motivated staff finds ways, or at least desperately tries, to leverage great athletes to get something from them. I just hope our coaches have tried.This always boogles my mind.
When a college football program recruits a top player they typically review a ton of 'film" visit a game or two to watch the player, and talk to coaches.
If he's this "thick" ( I was going to say stupid) why didn't this come out in the HS wash?
How did he qualify to go to and be accepted in college?
I think I know this answer and maybe this is the root of this issue.
So we have Hamin and Ford, PITT's highest rated players and neither one is making a significant contribution. Hamlin plays but it's hard to notice him on the field unless you go out of your way to find him getting beat somewhere.
Look at the Nitters, the Hoopies our ACC competition they seem to get alot from their top recruits??
Something isn't adding up!
"it's five o'clock somewhere"
Signed: Mr Buffett
Go PITT & CSU Rams!
The whole "too dumb to be effective" thing is tired. You cited WVU in particular. They got great service at a complicated (relatively speaking; it's freaking football) position from Pat White, a man so hopelessly challenged mentally that he communicated in grunts and yelps most of the time. Even Rushel Shell, stupid AND lazy AND stoned out of his gourd every moment ... yet WVU got solid, if unspectacular results (after we failed miserably to find a way). You could name countless others. Including some past Pitt stars too. You ultimately likely can't hack it with a whole team of drooling 'tards, usually at least some of the hogs are mentally competent ... I gotta figure there likely was a literate center who kept Pat White in the same zip code during his time...but a really clever and motivated staff finds ways, or at least desperately tries, to leverage great athletes to get something from them. I just hope our coaches have tried.
Um, I already did so in the post above, turning your own example against you (citing multiple WVU morons, including a QB, who were made into good to great players by their coaches).Really?
So Ford doesn't understand defenses, offenses or the PITT playbook so how do you explain things other than posting the meaningless crap above which looks like something an underperforming 8th grader would write!
So what is your explanation of Fords lack of knowledge about most everything related to PITT football.
I'm waiting for your response!
Lol!
This is one of the most entertaining things I do. LOL!
Anyway, as I've constantly said, Ford is more important as a recruiting symbol than an actual player.
Agree 100%. They should exhaust all possibilities with Ford before giving up on him. I have said before that I don't trust this staff at all. As you said, until this defense is even remotely respectable, they should be looking for answers. Prior to this past weekend, i thought the staff was dead from the neck up. Plucking V'lique Carter from the defense and moving him to offense and letting him run the jet was refreshing to see and lets me know that they are trying. Maybe if they gave Ford an entire game at safety, where he actually belongs, he might perform like V' lique did. Why do that tho? We have the stellar play of Briggs and Stocker and Campell to enjoy weekly.I continually call for any or all alternatives to be tried, 0 star or 5 star or anyone on between. Perhaps it's totally on the scheme and nobody could possibly exceed the meager accomplishments of Briggs. But until the D is not a total sieve, forgive the audacity to think somebody else might possibly warrant a shot.
As for Ford, I've said before, if he's that absolutely hopeless in the secondary after two years, it's simply smart business to make it at least look like an honest effort to leverage him at some position, any position. Couldn't he line up at H back and slip out into the flat? Give us any smidgen of a pass threat? Even as a decoy. It's not impossible to think he's just not suited for defense. Think DJ Dinkins, wasted trying to make him a safety (though Id take him in a sec there over that we have now). Think Dickerson. At least his coaches belatedly saw the light and got great service from him for a year. Maybe Pitt has tried and he's simply hopeless everywhere... but frankly then they should let some details on that leak, somehow. No trashing needed, just plant a little seed with Bucky Batko or whatever his name at the PG: "Pitt has relentlessly tried Paris Ford at multiple positions and it just hasn't worked out." To counter relentless negative recruiting as others said. And to assuage paying customers. Because otherwise, the optics stink. "Look, one of the worst secondary in America, and they wasted Ford".
In basketball there are many guys who are great players in a streetball type setting. But you try to put them in an organized setting running plays, motions etc and they have no clue how to play.
At SV Ford basically played streetball football. Seriously all he did most of the time was play S in the middle of the field and use his athletic advantage to run around and make plays against small school bad football players. At this level everyone has athletes.
Not saying Ford is dumb but he never had to learn or use the mental side of the game. I think if he decides to actually get his ass in the playbook and work his ass off he could turn out to be a real good S for us next year.
Yes we all agree Briggs is bad but if Briggs were to be out for the season tomorrow a bunch of guys would still be ahead of Ford because he clearly does not know how to make any of the calls at S as PN pretty much said in a nice way. But PN also said he thinks Ford can be a real good S in time IF he works and studies.
IMO Ford can be a starting S next year but it’s up to him IF he wants to put in the work. And there is nothing wrong with being a 1st time starter as a Soph.
If Ford is a dumb lazy jackoff, then just tell the people.
All of this is good information. Good post!
So why did we waste our recruiting time, a recruiting spot, on someone who played HS " streetball" with little chance of succeeding at the college level given the PITT schemes?
I'll be honest where I grew up, where I played, where we live ( I coached), noone who plays just "streetball" and plays on a good HS football team.
There are too many other players who put in the time, and hard work to follow the coaches plan.
"it's five o'clock somewhere"
Signed: Mr Buffett
Go PITT & CSU Rams!
Wait, people think that not playing a guy is going to turn off future recruits, but publicly telling people that the same guys is a dumb, lazy jackoff is the way to go? Yikes!
No one wants to see Ford excelling at safety more than me.
If PN met you he would conclude that you are dumb. Those were my words. I think our coach might say to the media that Paris will play when he puts in the necessary time and effort. Highly unlikely Pat would ever call one of our players dumb, lazy, or a jackoff in front of the media. Then again, you knew that, you just have that penchant for making obnoxious posts.Wait, people think that not playing a guy is going to turn off future recruits, but publicly telling people that the same guys is a dumb, lazy jackoff is the way to go? Yikes!
If PN met you he would conclude that you are dumb. Those were my words. I think our coach might say to the media that Paris will play when he puts in the necessary time and effort. Highly unlikely Pat would ever call one of our players dumb, lazy, or a jackoff in front of the media. Then again, you knew that, you just have that penchant for making obnoxious posts.
You are posting anonymously on a board and drawing attention. The better question is what do you have to lose?Ok what do I have to gain, to make stuff up?
I'm not sure why a recruit would read this board. They should have other things to do and access to the pay board. Not alot or reliable stuff is posted here.Wait, people think that not playing a guy is going to turn off future recruits, but publicly telling people that the same guys is a dumb, lazy jackoff is the way to go? Yikes!