ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Steelers Bengals

It is always dumb to run one play with no timeouts, with the qb normally chucking the ball out of the end zone
 
It’s amazing to me that so many coaches are awful with clock management. Eberflus at Chicago has set the bar extremely high for incompetence.
 
Charles Davis thinks that the Bengals should be happy that after giving up the ball with less than two minutes on the clock that they allowed the Stillers to go right down the field and kick a field goal?

Really?
 
Kind of pulled an Eberflus at the end. Always amazes me how these coaches hold on to that last timeout waaaayyyy too long. What’s the sense of saving it when the clock runs so low you can’t run another play anyway?
 
From the 15 with no timeouts the odds of getting a touchdown are likely less than one percent. Higher odds of getting tackled in bounds and the clock running out
 
  • Like
Reactions: Upg bobcat
From the 15 with no timeouts the odds of getting a touchdown are likely less than one percent. Higher odds of getting tackled in bounds and the clock running out
Huh? Not if you take a shot into the end zone.
 
Yes, definitely. Teams throw a TD pass there less than 1% of the time. And get sacked and don't get the field goal off all the time.

🤪

Just out of curiosity, have you ever watched football before? :D
On the 15. No timeouts. 10 seconds left in the half.

DEFINITELY one percent
 
Yeah they are taught to throw it out of the end zone if nobody open. Which occurs the overwhelming majority of the time


Exactly. Which is why it is a play with almost all upside and almost no downside. The upside is you get the touchdown. The downside is that you kick a field goal with three seconds on the clock. Which is what happened anyway.

Almost all upside, almost no downside.
 
Exactly. Which is why it is a play with almost all upside and almost no downside. The upside is you get the touchdown. The downside is that you kick a field goal with three seconds on the clock. Which is what happened anyway.

Almost all upside, almost no downside.
No upside just a dumb play that has little chance of success. I actually never understood why they do it, teams will be even more conservative because they don’t want to risk an interception in the end zone
 
No upside just a dumb play that has little chance of success. I actually never understood why they do it, teams will be even more conservative because they don’t want to risk an interception in the end zone


Like I said, it's almost as if you've never watched football before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FireballZ
That of course isn’t the scenario being discussed


I mean since people mentioned Matt Eberflus, it was just a couple of week ago that the Commanders completed a 52 yard pass on the last play of the game.

Or does that not count because 52 isn't 16?
 
I guess I didn’t understand the rule, thought he was going to be the first I’ve seen to be ejected under the 2 PF rule.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT