Not much left
Wow. You used up your entire 3 hours. Were you seeking a trade? Lol.Josh Newkirk
Wow. You used up your entire 3 hours. Were you seeking a trade? Lol.
There should be a day were people can make trades , the trades would need to be approved by a committee for fairness .Wow. You used up your entire 3 hours. Were you seeking a trade? Lol.
Newkirt and cash for a N95 no way even up !He was trying to trade his pick for an N95 mask.
Wow. You used up your entire 3 hours. Were you seeking a trade? Lol.
Good practice player !Malik Ellison
Mr Irrelevant
Lol. Hilarious. Let’s hope Horton is better.Good practice player !
Unless I missed someone, the highest scoring average among players who did not get picked was 6.1 ppg by both Sotiris Aggelou and Marlon Rymes. The highest rebounding average that did not get picked was, believe it or not, Terrell Brown's 4.5 rpg. The highest assist average that did not get picked was Jeremy Holmes at 4.2 apg.
I looked at Rhymes, Aggelou and Holmes. Newkirk's numbers were pretty much the same, but I simply felt he was the better player than any of the three.
Aggelou proved he was overmatched at the Big East level and ended up as an unremarkable player at St. Francis. Rhymes was just not a very good player and only scored points but he started letting threes fly the moment he got into a game, and not at a good rate.
Holmes was OK, but I just think Newkirk was a little bit better.
Aggelou averaged 11.9, 3.0, 1.9 as a junior at St. Francis. If he could have done that at Pitt we'd have had something. Although he was a truly awful defender. As a senior his raw numbers went down, 7.7, 2.4, 1.4, but his shooting percentages were pretty good, 47.2% on twos and 37.9% on threes. But far better than what he did for us.
Newkirk was about as good as you could get. If you were looking for a small then I would have been picking between him, Holmes and maybe Sidy N'dir.
Aggelou averaged 11.9, 3.0, 1.9 as a junior at St. Francis. If he could have done that at Pitt we'd have had something. Although he was a truly awful defender. As a senior his raw numbers went down, 7.7, 2.4, 1.4, but his shooting percentages were pretty good, 47.2% on twos and 37.9% on threes. But far better than what he did for us.
Newkirk was about as good as you could get. If you were looking for a small then I would have been picking between him, Holmes and maybe Sidy N'dir.
I looked at his stats and they are mediocre. He is one of the guys that are victimized by the "just the stats" thing, because he played on a great team and was often the 4th or 5th option. While you had alot lesser players be on alot lesser teams who had access to alot better stats.Tyrell Biggs. Starter on the best Pitt team of all time. How is he still on the board?
I looked at his stats and they are mediocre. He is one of the guys that are victimized by the "just the stats" thing, because he played on a great team and was often the 4th or 5th option. While you had alot lesser players be on alot lesser teams who had access to alot better stats.
Chris Gant was actually pretty good — maybe pretty close or equal to Biggs. He didn’t have a jumper like Biggs but he was tougher finishing on the block.The 94/95 team is a great example of this. You have guys like Andre Aldridge and Chris Gant who weren't very good but have good counting stats because someone on that team had to, then you're comparing them to players like Tyrell who were undoubtedly better players but whose counting stats just don't match up. Clearly it's up to the voters to determine what they value, so that should be interesting.
Chris Gant was actually pretty good — maybe pretty close or equal to Biggs. He didn’t have a jumper like Biggs but he was tougher finishing on the block.
Vaughan had a better career than Young. Clyde would definitely be in our Top 5 of the Big East/ACC era. Jerome Lane would be in the Top 5 as well. I cannot believe he dropped to me at #10 in the 1st round.Yeah, I'm not sure how you could have watched them both play and think that Biggs is "undoubtably better".
Which is what is going to be a problem for some of us who have lots of players on their teams from before many people here watched them play. Guys are just going to get discounted in favor of players that people did see. For instance I think the perfect example of that is Sam Young versus Clyde Vaughan. Everyone here saw Young. Many did not see Vaughan. I'll bet nearly all of those people who didn't see Vaughan would think that Young was the better player. They'd be wrong. Vaughan did everything that Young did (well, except that sweet pump fake) and he did it all a little better.
We have another thread here asking who would be the next player to have their number retired. I think it's quite telling that the player who is the second leading scorer with the fourth highest scoring average who also has the fifth most rebounds in school history (even though he spent most of his time playing the three) wasn't even one of the choices given.
I loved watching Jerome play , he was relentless on the boards . His offense was around the rim with a lot of put backs . It always seemed like he was padding his rebound total by missing the first or even 2nd putVaughan had a better career than Young. Clyde would definitely be in our Top 5 of the Big East/ACC era. Jerome Lane would be in the Top 5 as well. I cannot believe he dropped to me at #10 in the 1st round.
Shorter had more offensive moves, but Lane was a far better rebounder and overall athlete. Shorter also shot the ball a lot more than Lane.I loved watching Jerome play , he was relentless on the boards . His offense was around the rim with a lot of put backs . It always seemed like he was padding his rebound total by missing the first or even 2nd put
back !
Jerome made the play that put Pitt bb on the map , I was there and it was a moment that makes going to the games an experience that can never be replaced even if they get 3D TVs .
As good as Jerome was Brian Shorter was even better , his offense around the rim against much taller players was astounding.
Hopefully as Pitt climbs out of this hole they’re in JC can convince players like Shorter , Lane and Smith back to Pitt .
Jerome was far and away the best rebounder in the history of Pitt bb with Sam Clancy and Blair a tossup for a close second . Shorter made shots around the basket that defied logic and he keep doing it . He was a special player until he got ill his senior yr . Had he been eligible his first yr Pitt wins a national championship. If Jerome would’ve had the offensive skills of BS he’d have been a superstar in the NBA . If I had to choose between Jerome and Brain I’m going with BS , but I’d love to have another Jerome Lane in a Panther uniform .Shorter had more offensive moves, but Lane was a far better rebounder and overall athlete. Shorter also shot the ball a lot more than Lane.
Agree totally. Jerome is the best rebounder Pitt has ever had, including Blair. However, Shorter was a better overall player than Jerome and like you said, if he was eligible as a Frosh, we would have been tough to beat. We had already beaten eventual National Championship winner, Kansas, earlier that year.Jerome was far and away the best rebounder in the history of Pitt bb with Sam Clancy and Blair a tossup for a close second . Shorter made shots around the basket that defied logic and he keep doing it . He was a special player until he got ill his senior yr . Had he been eligible his first yr Pitt wins a national championship. If Jerome would’ve had the offensive skills of BS he’d have been a superstar in the NBA . If I had to choose between Jerome and Brain I’m going with BS , but I’d love to have another Jerome Lane in a Panther uniform .
Frontline of Smith , Lane and Shorter whew !Agree totally. Jerome is the best rebounder Pitt has ever had, including Blair. However, Shorter was a better overall player than Jerome and like you said, if he was eligible as a Frosh, we would have been tough to beat. We had already beaten eventual National Championship winner, Kansas, earlier that year.
Jerome was far and away the best rebounder in the history of Pitt bb with Sam Clancy and Blair a tossup for a close second . Shorter made shots around the basket that defied logic and he keep doing it . He was a special player until he got ill his senior yr . Had he been eligible his first yr Pitt wins a national championship. If Jerome would’ve had the offensive skills of BS he’d have been a superstar in the NBA . If I had to choose between Jerome and Brain I’m going with BS , but I’d love to have another Jerome Lane in a Panther uniform .
Agree totally. Jerome is the best rebounder Pitt has ever had, including Blair. However, Shorter was a better overall player than Jerome and like you said, if he was eligible as a Frosh, we would have been tough to beat. We had already beaten eventual National Championship winner, Kansas, earlier that year.
Jerome was far and away the best rebounder in the history of Pitt bb
I’m not going to argue that Blair wasn’t a great rebounder , but stats don’t always tell you everything . There’s many factors involved , like whose on your team , how good does your team shoot as well as your opponents, how good are the teams your playing against etc . If you wish to believe Blair was better go with it I’ll believe Lane was better ( but not by much ) Sam Clancy was also in the conversation . His stats are better than both according to sports - reference .comWRONG. Blair was better and the numbers back this up. Lane had his best rebounding season as a Soph with an avg of 15.6 rebounds per 40 minutes which is great. But Blair blows him out of the water with his Soph season where he avg 18.4 per 40 minutes.
Let me go in to more detail how dominant a rebounder Blair was. I did a quick search of the modern when the 3pt shot started (this was Lanes Soph year) and only 2 power conference players had a season where they averaged over 18 rebounds per 40 minutes...Blair & SHAQ! There were a few non power conf players to do this but of course they played against far easier comp.
Blair’s 8.3 offensive rebounds per 40 as a Soph are the best in the modern era for any power conf player. If Blair would have stayed 4 years he was on pace to pass Tim Duncan as the BEST rebounder of the modern era. Blair only played 26 min per game while Duncan played 35. BTW Blair averaged more rebounds per game for his career than Lane while playing 6 minutes less per game. I already stated how Blair dominates Lane in per 40 rebounds. Case closed.
I’m not going to argue that Blair wasn’t a great rebounder , but stats don’t always tell you everything . There’s many factors involved , like whose on your team , how good does your team shoot as well as your opponents, how good are the teams your playing against etc . If you wish to believe Blair was better go with it I’ll believe Lane was better ( but not by much ) Sam Clancy was also in the conversation . His stats are better than both according to sports - reference .com
I’m not basing my life or anything else solely on stats . I watch the games and form my opinions on what I see . Your entitled to only use stats to form your opinions , it is America after all . Did you personally see Lane or Big Sam play ? I think Sam might be one of few guys who could have ripped the ball out of Blair’s hands . They’re all great rebounders my fav is Jerome . A guy no one mentions is Melvin Bennett out of Peabody . He only played a yr at Pitt , but what a leaper and rebounder he was , had he stayed longer he’d be in the conversation .You won’t argue because you can’t back up what you have to say. First off Clancy did not have better rebounding stats. 1.) he played in a much easier conference. 2.) he averaged 12.5 rebounds per 40 min which is actually worse than Lane and way worse than Blair’s 18.4!
As far as Lane I gave you tons of evidence to back it up. Per 40 min Blair destroys Lane. And Blair still wins per game despite playing 6 min less per game.
And if you want to try to bring in other factors such as team or comp Blair wins as well. Blair played on a better rebounding team meaning he had to fight off more teammates for rebounds. They both played in the Big East but Blair played a tougher scheduled just look at the SOS and you will see. The Big East when Lane played only had 9 teams meanwhile when Blair played in the Big East it had 16 teams.
I’ll give you SOS so you don’t have to look it up. Lanes team 7.2 and Blair’s team 8.6. So Blair played against a tougher schedule and had to fight off more teammates on a better rebounding team for boards.
Any way you want to argue Blair wins. Try and provide some actual evidence to back up an argument instead of just an uninformed opinion.
I watched both and strictly on the eye test, I give Blair a clear edge. But both were quite extraordinary.I’m not basing my life or anything else solely on stats . I watch the games and form my opinions on what I see . Your entitled to only use stats to form your opinions , it is America after all . Did you personally see Lane or Big Sam play ? I think Sam might be one of few guys who could have ripped the ball out of Blair’s hands . They’re all great rebounders my fav is Jerome . A guy no one mentions is Melvin Bennett out of Peabody . He only played a yr at Pitt , but what a leaper and rebounder he was , had he stayed longer he’d be in the conversation .
Interesting that 3/4 best rebounders in Pitt bb history are city league guys !
Has there ever been a more unstoppable player in pro bb than Wilt , he holds 72 individual records and averaged over 22 rebounds per game , but Dennis Rodman had a higher TRB% than Wilt . Was he a better rebounder than Wilt ? I don’t think so .
In college Fb , has there ever been a better running back than TD ? Well Ron Dayne is the all time leading rusher , is he better ? He gained more yards and had a higher yds/ attempt .
Use stats all you want , but don’t forget to watch the game !
I’m not basing my life or anything else solely on stats . I watch the games and form my opinions on what I see . Your entitled to only use stats to form your opinions , it is America after all . Did you personally see Lane or Big Sam play ? I think Sam might be one of few guys who could have ripped the ball out of Blair’s hands . They’re all great rebounders my fav is Jerome . A guy no one mentions is Melvin Bennett out of Peabody . He only played a yr at Pitt , but what a leaper and rebounder he was , had he stayed longer he’d be in the conversation .
Interesting that 3/4 best rebounders in Pitt bb history are city league guys !
Has there ever been a more unstoppable player in pro bb than Wilt , he holds 72 individual records and averaged over 22 rebounds per game , but Dennis Rodman had a higher TRB% than Wilt . Was he a better rebounder than Wilt ? I don’t think so .
In college Fb , has there ever been a better running back than TD ? Well Ron Dayne is the all time leading rusher , is he better ? He gained more yards and had a higher yds/ attempt .
Use stats all you want , but don’t forget to watch the game !
Blair was definitely the more physical of the two , but Jeromes instincts were off the charts . I just hope some day Pitt will have someone else to compare to either one of those two .I watched both and strictly on the eye test, I give Blair a clear edge. But both were quite extraordinary.
No doubt about Shorter on that team.Blair was definitely the more physical of the two , but Jeromes instincts were off the charts . I just hope some day Pitt will have someone else to compare to either one of those two .
Now if I was starting a team from scratch I’d pick Blair over Lane . Blair was much more than a great rebounder . If I had a great center I’d rather have Jerome . If I’m allowed to take any Pitt player and combine him with a great center I’d take Brian Shorter . If Shorter had stayed healthy and was just a little taller he’d have been an All Pro in the NBA.
I know you think Rod Brookin was the key to that 87 team , but had Shorter been eligible no one would’ve beaten them with Smith ,Lane and Shorter in the front court .
It would’ve been quite the show Sam vs Blair . Clancy was strong enough to play D line in the NFL without ever playing any college ball .I have played, coached, scouted, trained etc the game at different levels. Have coached many guys who play or have played pro ball...guarantee I have more BB experience than you though I’m younger. Saw most of Lanes games. Was at the game where he broke the backboard as a kid (still have a piece of the glass).
Lane was very good but if he went head to head vs Blair for a rebound my $ are on Blair. Blair was used to going against taller and longer guys (that would not be Lane). Lane was 6’ 6” and Blair 6’5 1/2 with a much longer reach. Lane was 230 Blair came into Pitt around 300 and played his Soph year about 285-290 (Forget what they say his program weight was). Blair had 55 to 60 pounds on Lane of pure brute strength. NO one could stop Blair when he wanted to get a rebound especially and O rebound.
But forget both of our words I’ll go by Jim Calhoun who knows a thing or 2 about Big East BB and he said Blair was the best rebounder he ever went up against! As we know Calhoun coached against both guys. We know he is a scumbag like many coaches but he knows the game as well as or better than most. Would love to hear you argue against Calhoun.
As far as Sam I’ll take the word of my uncle who played against him in HS and against him in college at the D1 level. My uncle said Sam was a beast. Then my uncle saw Blair play and he said he never thought he would see Pitt have a more physical player and better rebounder than Sam until he saw Blair play.
Can’t argue the point , I wanted Brookin on my team , but someone took him in the round I was going to pick in before I had the chance .No doubt about Shorter on that team.
But I kinda write off Shorter since he was never eligible to begin with. Brookin blew it!
Plus Rod brought an element of shooting that would have made that team next to impossible to beat.
Blair was definitely the more physical of the two , but Jeromes instincts were off the charts . I just hope some day Pitt will have someone else to compare to either one of those two .
Now if I was starting a team from scratch I’d pick Blair over Lane . Blair was much more than a great rebounder . If I had a great center I’d rather have Jerome . If I’m allowed to take any Pitt player and combine him with a great center I’d take Brian Shorter . If Shorter had stayed healthy and was just a little taller he’d have been an All Pro in the NBA.
I know you think Rod Brookin was the key to that 87 team , but had Shorter been eligible no one would’ve beaten them with Smith ,Lane and Shorter in the front court .
It would’ve been quite the show Sam vs Blair . Clancy was strong enough to play D line in the NFL without ever playing any college ball .
Jerome was a different rebounder than Blair , Jerome was a strong athletic guy , but Blair was just a physical beast ( in a complimentary way ! ) . Jerome was just one of those guys who knew where to be and then made the play . Like I said above I’d start my team with D Blair who was a more valuable player than Jerome , but if I already had a great center I’d take Jerome on my team over Blair .
Blair could manhandle Dennis Rodman , but was he a better rebounder than Rodman ? Strength isn’t everything .Instinct , timing , jumping ability ,quickness all count .
We’re disagreeing over whose prettier the blonde or the brunette, beauty is in the eye of the beholder .