Rioting, looting and anarchy are not a cure. Then again, most of that stuff isn't due to the actions of a few rogue cops, but the actions of some socialist radicals. There is absolutely no legitimate justification for this lawlessness, none!
do you know the history of the united states? and what a recent right wing political movement named itself after?
Are you saying that the Tea Party was/is comparable to comparable to those I mentioned? Really?
You seem to believe that the protests consist of only rioters and looters. That is a complete and utter falsehood. In the first few days of the protests the rioters and looters came out in force as always. But that died down fairly quickly. And it was dead wrong to start with. Since then most of the violence at these protests were caused by outside forces trying to goad the protesters and police wading in to break up the protests. But calling lawful, constitutional protest "riots" is a convenient way to say there should be no protests. Keep things the way they are like good little patriots.Rioting, looting and anarchy are not a cure. Then again, most of that stuff isn't due to the actions of a few rogue cops, but the actions of some socialist radicals. There is absolutely no legitimate justification for this lawlessness, none!
I agree. This is about sensible punishment. It should be quick and with a reasonable expectation of preventing someone from reoffending. Personally I would much rather have the whipping post than five years in jail.
I have to think that some of them knew where she was the whole time. Seems she thought she was protected to some extent.
Again. Don't confuse protesters with looters and rioters. Millions have hit the streets in protest and some only look at the early riots and looters, which, again were clearly wrong.
No, but she is under constant watch, they must have learned something from the Epstein mess, she would be an easier Mark outside
I don't know how you can interpret, "Defunding the police means defunding the police" to know how much they are talking about taking away from the departments.
No
But I’d have to scoff that your introduction is because a wealthy white women has to sit in jail awaiting trials .
So . If i'm arrested and put in jail , I dont have a right for representation ?
Sure
It's nice to have the means to make bail . The rest .... Well they probably deserve to sit and rot .
Ya mean the poor
Well I sure as hell am not posting there bail . Shame on them for being "Poor" .
She , with the stuff she knows , will never see a pre-trial conference .
Just saying no one is saying get rid of the police. How they direct the funds isn't known to me. And I don't know what you are talking about when you say "defund the police means defund the police".
Chauvin had 18 prior misconduct complaints. Those were all handled by the department IA unit, i.e., his fellow officers, who exonerated him 17 times.
1. She has passports and citizenship for 4 different countries. She’s a flight risk.
You missed my point. Don't be so smart that you miss what I was saying.
40% is a high percentage. So yes. Don't try to enter a conversation midway, without understanding context and try to outsmart people. Is a very weird way of big timing.
