We had this discussion during the pay board draft. Krauser fell to me at #10 overall and I happily took him. Knight, Cummings and Fields were all gone I believe. But statistically, based on my analysis, he was the top PG in the draft, and I believe thirteenNine has him #1 or #2 as well. And surprisingly, McCullough was right there with the others. All ahead of Miller.
Well I’m not thrilled that I had to take him...but it’s that whole PG conundrum. I had to get one or be stuck. Look at our other draft. There were some guys with really solid teams...but a glaring hole at the point.
You know I’m just ribbing. It is rough watching 40 picks go before you and see all that talent drop off the board.Hey ... my team on the other board isn't that bad!!!
It's better than about half of the ones there.
But yes, drafting at spots #40 and #41 in that draft was REALLY tough. I was thrilled to get the two players I got there.
Yes, it is.Hey ... my team on the other board isn't that bad!!!
It's better than about half of the ones there.
But yes, drafting at spots #40 and #41 in that draft was REALLY tough. I was thrilled to get the two players I got there.
JWF’s 40% three point shooting isn’t anything to sneeze at, and his ~10 threes against Syracuse in the ACC tournament deserves mention in the pantheon of Pitt conference tournament individual performances. Classic Pitt type of senior.
As I said, I almost went with Porter on my last pick too. He's a Swiss Army knife.
If you wanted a point, Robinson would have to be your guy. If you wanted the better, more athletic player, it would be Porter. This goes down to what position you need. I almost picked Porter, but not as a point guard.
