Hey…I heard the Steelers had a stellar offseason and upgraded the QB room. Disregard the 4-8 for 45 yards…that’s Kenny’s fault. 😂
It is called jealousy! The Steelers are a mess right now but they are a far better mess that what Pitt Football has been the last 2 yearsI think any poster calling the Steelers franchise a joke is really going out of their way making themselves look like a joke
Roll the dice. Wilson is not worth anywhere near $40 million. He 's ready to get on with his life after football. Trade for someone and/or draft a QB early in the draft.This is the projectes price for Russell Wilson. Will Rooney pony up the money to keep him, or roll the dice with Fields and possibly a draft pick?
They might as well trade for Deshaun Watson. The Browns will gladly eat a lot of the $45 mil he's owed.Roll the dice. Wilson is not worth anywhere near $40 million. He 's ready to get on with his life after football. Trade for someone and/or draft a QB early in the draft.
I certainly don't want NON PASSER Kordell Jr. Fields locked in for 5 years. I'd rather tank, go 3-14 or something and get in position to draft a real PASSERYou want to give Mr. 45yardsatthehalf $65 million? Lolololololol. WTF?
What team is paying Fields anything over a minimum contract?
Totally agree!! He's going to get more than league minimum.Feel free to bump this thread later after he signs for significantly more than league minimum.
Maybe your worst take ever, and I'm no fan of Justin Fields.
There are way too many QB needy teams out there and honestly he hasn't been horrible.....he just doesn't move the needle when you have 2 legit MVP candidate quarterbacks in your division.Totally agree!! He's going to get more than league minimum.
Nah. The pirates openly flaunt that they don't want to win. Steel openly flaunts that they are world beaters, but they ain't.It's hilarious that in a town with Pitt and the Pirates, someone would consider the Steelers a joke.
Feel free to bump this thread later after he signs for significantly more than league minimum.
Maybe your worst take ever, and I'm no fan of Justin Fields.
Teams could see that veteran qbs such as Mayfield and Darnold coming into an offense with a quality OL and WRs can produce quickly. Fields has never been a great pocket passer but if you gave him the talent that others have had, I suspect he can put up above average numbers.There are way too many QB needy teams out there and honestly he hasn't been horrible.....he just doesn't move the needle when you have 2 legit MVP candidate quarterbacks in your division.
The rumor is the Bears were asking for too much prior to the draft. No one has to give up draft capital to sign him as a FA.The bears offered him to everyone. Everyone passed but the stillers who thought he was worth a 6th round pick.
A year later after being benched in favor a washed up RW, why would his "value" increase?
The rumor is the Bears were asking for too much prior to the draft. No one has to give up draft capital to sign him as a FA.
I said before the draft! After they drafted Caleb their perceived leverage was gone.C'mon, a 6th round pick? That's basically a worthless "asset".
I said before the draft! After they drafted Caleb their perceived leverage was gone.
Google is your friend.That's not why. Everyone knew long before the draft, Caleb was the pick and Fields was getting dumped. No one was interested in him. EOS.
Google is your friend.
AI Overview
Learn more
The Chicago Bears were reportedly asking for a second- or third-round pick in exchange for quarterback Justin Fields. However, the Bears ultimately traded Fields to the Pittsburgh Steelers for a conditional sixth-round pick in 2025:
This is what I wrote and you disputed it - keep up!Dude, no one is disputing that Chicago was asking too much for a terrible QB.
Just because you are asking $50k for your 2004 Kia Sportage, that doesn't mean your Kia is worth $50k.
The most any team was willing to give for Justin Fields was the stillers "brain" trust and that value was 6 round pick.
They did upgrade the QB room. Obviously, they weren't stellar this season, but the defense and running game were worse this year. None of it matters as long as Tomlin is head coach.Hey…I heard the Steelers had a stellar offseason and upgraded the QB room. Disregard the 4-8 for 45 yards…that’s Kenny’s fault. 😂
Upgraded to what?They did upgrade the QB room. Obviously, they weren't stellar this season, but the defense and running game were worse this year. None of it matters as long as Tomlin is head coach.
Wilson/Fields > Pickett/Trubisky/RudolphUpgraded to what?
This is what I wrote and you disputed it - keep up!
The rumor is the Bears were asking for too much prior to the draft. No one has to give up draft capital to sign him as a FA.
Did you factor the change in OC into that equation?Wilson/Fields > Pickett/Trubisky/Rudolph
2024:
3,607 yards, 21 TDs 6 INTs, 7 rushing TDs
2023:
3,421 yards, 13 TDs, 9 INTs, 3 rushing TDs
Neither set of QBs were particularly good, but definitely better this year. The offense actually went out and won some games and didn't need the defense to ball out every single week like the last couple of years.
Already answered your question - you don't have to give up draft capital for him. He's a FA. I never mentioned him being a starter - just that he'll get more than the league minimum.You said "they lost their perceived leverage". What leverage? Everyone knew he was done in Chicago just like everyone knew he's worth nothing more than a 6th round pick.
Which leads back to the original question, why would the same teams now be interested the guy?
He's going ride a bench somewhere, "earning" a backup salary. If I were betting on it, I would guess he is a stiller next year because they have no clue what they are doing.
Yep. The OC that was suppose to fix the running game had a less efficient ground game this year compared to last. Same head coach that doesn't know how to run a modern NFL offense. Also, the 2024 offense didn't even have a true No. 2 receiver. Diontae Johnson and George Pickens were much better options than Pickens and Van Jefferson.Did you factor the change in OC into that equation?
Wilson/Fields > Pickett/Trubisky/Rudolph
2024:
3,607 yards, 21 TDs 6 INTs, 7 rushing TDs
2023:
3,421 yards, 13 TDs, 9 INTs, 3 rushing TDs
Neither set of QBs were particularly good, but definitely better this year. The offense actually went out and won some games and didn't need the defense to ball out every single week like the last couple of years.
Already answered your question - you don't have to give up draft capital for him. He's a FA. I never mentioned him being a starter - just that he'll get more than the league minimum.
Yep. The OC that was suppose to fix the running game had a less efficient ground game this year compared to last. Same head coach that doesn't know how to run a modern NFL offense. Also, the 2024 offense didn't even have a true No. 2 receiver. Diontae Johnson and George Pickens were much better options than Pickens and Van Jefferson.
Long term? It was brilliant because they aren't tied to a ridiculously high QB contract for a player who is not a long-term answer.Trubisky and his 150 ypg is irrelevant since he was never in the plans for 2024. Obviously, none of it is apples to apple but the point those stats highlight, is how stupid signing RW/JF was long term..
Yes, the guy who average 78 receptions, 873 yards, and 5 TDs per year in his 5 season with the Steelers. That is unless you believe Van Jefferson's 24 receptions for 276 yards and 2 TDs was an upgrade.Johnson? The guy who was cut this year?
Are you insisting that Fields will be signed for the league minimum next year? Didn’t try to follow this all the way thru so not sure.Ok. Sleep well with that ill-conceived thought. Lol
Dont go away mad…just go away!Ok. Sleep well with that ill-conceived thought. Lol
Yes, the guy who average 78 receptions, 873 yards, and 5 TDs per year in his 5 season with the Steelers. That is unless you believe Van Jefferson's 24 receptions for 276 yards and 2 TDs was an upgrade.
Are you insisting that Fields will be signed for the league minimum next year? Didn’t try to follow this all the way thru so not sure.
But if so, you’re truly out of your mind.
Long term? It was brilliant because they aren't tied to a ridiculously high QB contract for a player who is not a long-term answer.