ADVERTISEMENT

OT:Buccos

Here's your solution- put the team up for sale and have it acquired by an owner who wants to win a championship. The Pirates have indemnic issues( you can look that word up in the dictionary)borne out of Nutting's refusal to make the necessary investment to produce a championship caliber team. Now get back in formation with your buddies in the idiot brigade...all of you have posted in this thread defending the worst owner in professional sports.

LOL,
 
Teke said, sellers this year, not buyers, haven't been that way around here in a few years! Who did we buy that put us in great shape to win a championship?
 
Last edited:
Del thinks that clinging to the narratives spewn by writers who are stuck at dead end jobs and are kept at arms' length from the game is a convincing "appeal to authority" argument.

It's truly amazing how much he backs up his views by citing the writers who the game has shunned for decades.

Literally none of them get hired into baseball itself, but in Del's mind getting hired by a 3rd party entity to casually write about baseball somehow gives the writer knowledge.

I think the line of logic is just too simplistic for me to comprehend, because I have no idea how he makes those connections.
. You live in yor own little fantasy world concocting theories that no baseball expert subscribes to but who you contend are in dead end jobs-they would, like we do, all laugh at you.
 
I guess this board is just SHOCKED, staff is not very good, and no power to knock in runs ?

AM is the only surprise to me, thought he would be better than he is right now. That's it

I'm surprised Liriano sucks ass, they spent money on him as a free agent when he was the 2nd best lefthander on the market and one of the 10 best guys available overall. That's a foolproof way to build a team.

Meanwhile, the Pirates offense ranks a solid 4th in MLB
 
  • Like
Reactions: OriginalEther
Thank God, new administration at Pitt, Mario, and the evil ROONEYS, that's who is serious around here about winning
 
. You live in yor own little fantasy world concocting theories that no baseball expert subscribes to but who you contend are in dead end jobs-they would, like we do, all laugh at you.

I have literally not concocted a single one of these theories, these are coming from people far smarter than me who are actually desirable candidates to work in Major League front offices. You know, not journalists who talk about needing to get a veteran presence, a proven closer, and a RBI guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OriginalEther
FL to me was a wild card, thought he could go either way, hoped for the best, so yes that might be another that surprised me so far with AM.

Every team deals with injuries, so I'm not debating that.
 
FL to me was a wild card, thought he could go either way, hoped for the best, so yes that might be another that surprised me so far with AM.

Every team deals with injuries, so I'm not debating that.

No but they spent MONEY on him. When he was considered an IMPACT free agent. The kind of guy you need if you're SERIOUS. There's absolutely NO WAY those guys could ever blow up in your face.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OriginalEther
They announced on ESPN about 3 players that were good, on the block, that could help the Pirates. I don't know if they are right or wrong, but I bet we don't get any of them , and the reasons, I don't care, I already know
 
They let Marlon Byrd go so that Polanco could develop. They signed Liriano as a free agent. They've extended pretty much everybody worth a damn. They signed Kang. They're paying a freaking relief pitcher almost 8 figures. They added more payroll at last year's trade deadline than anybody else.

This year was clearly meant to allow themselves to make room for Taillon and Glasnow on the staff. Yeah, they left holes in the rotation, but it's not like they left holes to mail in the season. They left holes so they could bring up 2 of the most highly regarded pitchers in the minors and not have their payroll tied up going forward.

How were they supposed to move a guy like Happ to make room for their pitchers? Treat him like Edwin Jackson and pay him 8 figures to wallow away as AAA depth?

Payroll and free agent moves are comfort blankets for the feeble minded. Rather than try to understand the game they just want to be able to take solace in the fact that "my team tried, even if what they did was stupid". Emotions are meant to be present when the game goes on. Emotions have no place in analysis.
No team interested in winning s championship plays for a half of a season with a rotation full of garbage because they believe they have a couple of prodoects who MAY be ready to ascend to the majors at a future point in the season. Do you even realize how stupid your arguments are in an effort to support this bum of an owner? And the last paragraph of your post is more spurious drivel!
 
They announced on ESPN about 3 players that were good, on the block, that could help the Pirates. I don't know if they are right or wrong, but I bet we don't get any of them , and the reasons, I don't care, I already know

Go ahead and post the names. It's probably like Ryan Braun, Jonathan Lucroy, and Albert Pujols.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OriginalEther
No team interested in winning s championship plays for a half of a season with a rotation full of garbage because they believe they have a couple of prodoects who MAY be ready to ascend to the majors at a future point in the season. Do you even realize how stupid your arguments are in an effort to support this bum of an owner? And the last paragraph of your post is more spurious drivel!

Um, if the goal is to have the best team at the end of the season, why would it matter if 2 guys are in the minors during the first half of the season?

Prior to the Cole and Cervelli injuries, they looked like they were in a decent spot for a 2nd half run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OriginalEther
I'm surprised Liriano sucks ass, they spent money on him as a free agent when he was the 2nd best lefthander on the market and one of the 10 best guys available overall. That's a foolproof way to build a team.

Meanwhile, the Pirates offense ranks a solid 4th in MLB
Without him they wouldn't have even gotten to the boobie prize game the last two years. You're beyond hilarious. I'd get more sensible insights from a toddler. The Pirates have spent the lion's share of their drafts on pitchers and they have one over rated starter to show for it. No team develops into a championship team exclusively thru the draft.
 
Without him they wouldn't have even gotten to the boobie prize game the last two years. You're beyond hilarious. I'd get more sensible insights from a toddler. The Pirates have spent the lion's share of their drafts on pitchers and they have one over rated starter to show for it. No team develops into a championship team exclusively thru the draft.

Liriano, Kang, Harrison, Cervelli, Stewart, Polanco, Marte, Niese, Melancon. Not drafted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OriginalEther
Um, if the goal is to have the best team at the end of the season, why would it matter if 2 guys are in the minors during the first half of the season?

Prior to the Cole and Cervelli injuries, they looked like they were in a decent spot for a 2nd half run.
The wins in the first half count the same as those in the second half, unless things work differently in your fantasy world. The teams with the most wins at year end play for a championship, something you believe is the product of pure luck...what a joke.
 
The wins in the first half count the same as those in the second half, unless things work differently in your fantasy world. The teams with the most wins at year end play for a championship, something you believe is the product of pure luck...what a joke.

If the teams with the most wins at year-end played for the Championship the Pirates and Cubs wouldn't have been in the Wild Card game last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OriginalEther
They announced on ESPN about 3 players that were good, on the block, that could help the Pirates. I don't know if they are right or wrong, but I bet we don't get any of them , and the reasons, I don't care, I already know
Why would Nutsack pick up anyone this year if he believes he has prospects who can fill the holes 2 years from now? That's his loser's, cheap owner's philosophy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TD_istheman
Too stupid a post to even reply to, Moneybalz.

Why?

You're so insistent that the playoffs are purely merit based, so wouldn't it make sense to maximize the talent level of your team at year-end? Sacrificing some wins in the first half in order to have more success in the 2nd half is the natural strategy, right?

If you win 90 games instead of 100 because you chose to work in talented youngsters, you still go to the playoffs. Except you're going into the playoffs with a better, more talented team.

I realize this requires a bit of intelligence and critical thinking but I'm hopeful that I've dumbed it down enough for you.
 
Or you can try to win all year, win the division, and not have to deal with facing guys like Cueti, Bumgardner, and Arrieta in a do or die just to get into a playoff series.

But yeah, just getting to host wild card games every year is great, right?
 
Or you can try to win all year, win the division, and not have to deal with facing guys like Cueti, Bumgardner, and Arrieta in a do or die just to get into a playoff series.

But yeah, just getting to host wild card games every year is great, right?

What good does winning the division do if you're stuck with guys like JA Happ in your rotation in playoffs? What good does having JA Happ in your rotation next year and the year after do you?

If I need to give up 4 wins this year in order to have a better team at year-end, plus give myself an additional 5 or 6 wins a year over the next several years I'm doing that every time.

Everybody gets so obsessed about this year with absolutely no foresight. The issue is never signing a free agent for this year, the issue is being stuck with that free agent for the next several years. I'm not committing a rotation spot for multiple years to somebody like Mike Leake or JA Happ or Yovani Gallardo or James Shields or even a Francisco Liriano type in a perfect world.
 
Why would Nutsack pick up anyone this year if he believes he has prospects who can fill the holes 2 years from now? That's his loser's, cheap owner's philosophy.

I'm in full agreement, Nutting has his sheep chanting NEXT YEAR, carrot in front of the greyhound, but I stopped buying that years ago. Iwas a sucker for a few years, no more
 
What good does winning the division do if you're stuck with guys like JA Happ in your rotation in playoffs? What good does having JA Happ in your rotation next year and the year after do you?

If I need to give up 4 wins this year in order to have a better team at year-end, plus give myself an additional 5 or 6 wins a year over the next several years I'm doing that every time.

Everybody gets so obsessed about this year with absolutely no foresight. The issue is never signing a free agent for this year, the issue is being stuck with that free agent for the next several years. I'm not committing a rotation spot for multiple years to somebody like Mike Leake or JA Happ or Yovani Gallardo or James Shields or even a Francisco Liriano type in a perfect world.

So what you are saying is that the pirates should have given Russell Martin a 6-year deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittmeister
Or you can try to win all year, win the division, and not have to deal with facing guys like Cueti, Bumgardner, and Arrieta in a do or die just to get into a playoff series.

But yeah, just getting to host wild card games every year is great, right?
Obviously none of those teams tried to win either, since they were in the wild card game too.
 
Free agency right now is trash your paying guys money for what they did not what they are going to do. Attached is a graph from Fangraphs of all the data of pitchers age by age. It is easy to see that Velocity significantly drops and the effectiveness of the Pitcher clearly falls over time. This is the exact reason why you don't pay big money for Starting Pitching on the free agent market.
Pitcher_Curves_Starters.png
 
Obviously none of those teams tried to win either, since they were in the wild card game too.

Were those teams in the WC game three straight years?

Please try to compare the Giants and Pirates recent success. Please try to compare the Cubs and the Pirates. They're miles apart, and its because those two haven't been adverse to making big upgrades to their pitching staffs.
 
Were those teams in the WC game three straight years?

Please try to compare the Giants and Pirates recent success. Please try to compare the Cubs and the Pirates. They're miles apart, and its because those two haven't been adverse to making big upgrades to their pitching staffs.

And by "big upgrades" you of course mean "developing pitchers".

Giants won on the backs/arms of Cain, Lincecum, and Bumgarner -- all internally developed. Tim Hudson was bad, Barry Zito was horrible, Peavy's been awful, Vogelsong is Vogelsong. The Cubs signed Lester to a big deal, sure, but have developed or dumpster dived for everybody else. Lester isn't carrying them by any stretch, and Liriano was ranked similarly as the 2nd best LHP behind Lester the year they hit free agency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lilspainishflea
Free agency right now is trash your paying guys money for what they did not what they are going to do. Attached is a graph from Fangraphs of all the data of pitchers age by age. It is easy to see that Velocity significantly drops and the effectiveness of the Pitcher clearly falls over time. This is the exact reason why you don't pay big money for Starting Pitching on the free agent market.
Pitcher_Curves_Starters.png

Someone should tell the Cubs that they're dumb for spending on Lester, Lackey, and Hammel.

Or the Giants on Cueto and Samardzija.

Or the Dodgers on Kazmir and Maeda.

Or the Nationals on Scherzer.

That's the cream of the crop in the NL this year. In the meantime, the Pirates have Niese, Locke, and Nicasio in the rotation.
 
And by "big upgrades" you of course mean "developing pitchers".

Giants won on the backs/arms of Cain, Lincecum, and Bumgarner -- all internally developed. Tim Hudson was bad, Barry Zito was horrible, Peavy's been awful, Vogelsong is Vogelsong. The Cubs signed Lester to a big deal, sure, but have developed or dumpster dived for everybody else. Lester isn't carrying them by any stretch, and Liriano was ranked similarly as the 2nd best LHP behind Lester the year they hit free agency.

Simple question, do you really think the Pirates do everything they can to win the division? Keep in mind the rotation consists of Locke, Niese, and Nicasio, and the bullpen is a tire fire.
 
Giants 2010, 2012, 2014 World Series Champs
Starting Rotation
2010
Barry Zito (FA Signing one of the worst of all time)
Jonathan Sanchez (Drafted and Developed)
Matt Cain (Drafted and Developed)
Tim Lincecum (Drafted and Developed)
Madison Bumgarner (Drafted and Developed

2012
Same staff minus Sanchez and in Comes Ryan Vogelson signed to a cheap deal

2014
Same staff as 2012 Plus Tim Hudson on a reasonable deal and a trade of Jake Peavy. Bumgarner destroyed this post season with record numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lilspainishflea
Someone should tell the Cubs that they're dumb for spending on Lester, Lackey, and Hammel.

Or the Giants on Cueto and Samardzija.

Or the Dodgers on Kazmir and Maeda.

Or the Nationals on Scherzer.

That's the cream of the crop in the NL this year. In the meantime, the Pirates have Niese, Locke, and Nicasio in the rotation.
Lets look at Scherzer Cueto and Lester. Yeah those signings look like world beaters now but in two years they will be a shell of their former selves
 
Simple question, do you really think the Pirates do everything they can to win the division? Keep in mind the rotation consists of Locke, Niese, and Nicasio, and the bullpen is a tire fire.

I think they do everything they can to maximize their wins/competitiveness over a multiple year horizon. I think they refuse to go "all-in" and cripple themselves going forward. The only reason Locke and Nicasio are in the rotation is because they will be easy to move/cut/trade at the drop of a hat, with absolutely no impact on future payroll. I think they'd prefer a half year of Locke followed

I don't get the hatred directed at Niese. Look at his career track record compared to guys like JA Happ and Mike Leake and Jeff Samardzija -- the type of pitcher the Pirates would be able to afford in a pinch.

The Pirates are not one of the large market teams who can pay a guy for 5 years, while knowing that they'll only get 2 years of production out of him and will just need to eat the final 3 years. That's what happened to the Twins, Brewers, and Reds. They spent too much and wound up with a lot of dead money that crippled flexibility.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT